Ubuntu "Memberships" Questioned
mxh83 writes "Apparently if you have 'sustained' and 'significant' contributions to Ubuntu, you can become a 'Ubuntu Member' and get some freebies. 'While there is no precise period that we look for, it is rare for applications to be accepted from people contributing for less than 6 months. It is vital to be well prepared for the meeting. You need to convince the membership board that you have contributed to Ubuntu.' Have they thought this incentive through? What about recognition for smaller contributors? And who judged what is a 'significant' contribution to a community project?"
Update: 01/06 20:33 GMT by S : Changed the title to reflect the fact that Ubuntu memberships have actually been around for a few years now.
You need to convince the membership board [...] And who judged what is a 'significant' contribution
This is amazing... we've gone from people not reading the articles, to not reading the *summaries*, to the *submitters* not reading what they themselves wrote!
CmdrTaco, I know it's tradition for editors not to read the summaries, but isn't it taking it a bit far to not read ones you wrote yourself?!?!?
or drive away people that feel that they're being unfairly excluded from the program despite making only a marginally different contribution to those accepted or worse yet, seeing that their area of contribution seams to be less credited that other "pet areas", all in all a great way to drive a deep wedge into the community.
Well duh, you are supposed to contribute because you like to do it. Whatever they give you back is a plus.
As for who is going to judge what is a significat contribution... I guess whoever is giving you the free T-Shirt (Shuttleworth?)
Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
openSUSE has had a very similar program for some time.
http://en.opensuse.org/Members
Members get to vote on the board, and get a free boxed/retail copy of each openSUSE release.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
And the decision to use a BETA of Grub2 that even the developers say isn't ready for production use? Was that upstream at gnome too?
But that's the point. Once you start recognizing certain contributors more than others and giving them status symbols - especially where the difference is small and/or largely subjective - you risk creating a "them and us" situation.
Next phase is that the "them", who are probably more numerous and contribute more, feel rejected and decide to tell the clique to stuff it.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
And then contributors will be able to level-grind to earn more achievements. Let's just hope that they don't turn into one of those corporate situations where internal wiki edits and rcs actions count positively in the performance review regardless of substance.
There are 1.1... kinds of people.