Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu "Memberships" Questioned

mxh83 writes "Apparently if you have 'sustained' and 'significant' contributions to Ubuntu, you can become a 'Ubuntu Member' and get some freebies. 'While there is no precise period that we look for, it is rare for applications to be accepted from people contributing for less than 6 months. It is vital to be well prepared for the meeting. You need to convince the membership board that you have contributed to Ubuntu.' Have they thought this incentive through? What about recognition for smaller contributors? And who judged what is a 'significant' contribution to a community project?" Update: 01/06 20:33 GMT by S : Changed the title to reflect the fact that Ubuntu memberships have actually been around for a few years now.

11 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. Let me translate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You've contributed many manweeks of your life improving code. We're here to determine whether you might be worthy of receiving a free t-shirt."

    1. Re:Let me translate by xtracto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well duh, you are supposed to contribute because you like to do it. Whatever they give you back is a plus.

      As for who is going to judge what is a significat contribution... I guess whoever is giving you the free T-Shirt (Shuttleworth?)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:Let me translate by lymond01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We're here to determine whether you might be worthy of receiving a free t-shirt.

      I hear you get access to the Ubuntu Awards First Class Download area -- no bandwidth throttling for members!

      Honestly, I think it's a good idea to give back to the people who have contributed. It's a little bit like Heinlein's Starship Troopers (the movie does not exist) where you're only allowed to vote if you've served in the military. In Ubuntu's case, you're only allowed to be a member, therefore having access to a long list of very lucrative opportunities and items (kidding), if you've contributed. You don't just pay a fee, but you actually help. It's like working in the soup kitchen versus giving money to the homeless shelter.

    3. Re:Let me translate by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But that's the point. Once you start recognizing certain contributors more than others and giving them status symbols - especially where the difference is small and/or largely subjective - you risk creating a "them and us" situation.

      Next phase is that the "them", who are probably more numerous and contribute more, feel rejected and decide to tell the clique to stuff it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Wow.... things have *really* gone downhill by schon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You need to convince the membership board [...] And who judged what is a 'significant' contribution

    This is amazing... we've gone from people not reading the articles, to not reading the *summaries*, to the *submitters* not reading what they themselves wrote!

    CmdrTaco, I know it's tradition for editors not to read the summaries, but isn't it taking it a bit far to not read ones you wrote yourself?!?!?

  3. Why not? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    You already have to [digitally] sign a document and agree to a code of conduct in order to become an "Ubuntero", which among other minor benefits is necessary in order to get access to the PPA system. This is just another layer of evaluation for another icon next to your name on Ubuntu sites and... whatever it was they're giving you. In return, they give you the right to represent yourself as a "member" of Ubuntu, kind of like an employee except you don't get paid :)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Re:What? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

    It sounds like one of those dreadful golf clubs

    sounds like you've done driver development, before..

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  5. Not news by flimm · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ubuntu membership has not been introduced recently, it has been around from before I started Ubuntu (2006), at least. This is not news. The title needs changing.

    Ubuntu members get @ubuntu.com addresses, their blogs syndicated on planet.ubuntu.com, a free subscription to LWN, and they vote for certain things.

  6. Re:What about money contribution? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought it was scientology where you had to buy upgrades.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  7. Re:What about money contribution? by Praeluceo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought it was Catholicism where you had to buy indulgences?

  8. ...chewie by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wouldn't worry too much about that.

    Like, okay, you know in Star Wars, when Leia hands out medals to Luke and Han, but Chewie's just standing there on the podium - he doesn't get a medal?

    Well, here's the thing, if you're an Ubuntu contributor and you're chosen for membership, it's like getting those medals. But if you're an Ubuntu contributor, and you're not chosen for membership, you're like Chewie - no medal. But that's not a bad thing, because, you know what? Chewie is standing up there on the podium too, and you know what, it doesn't matter if he gets a medal - because Chewie is a frickin' bad ass, and Chewie knows it.

    Hell, the only reason Chewie doesn't get a medal is cause he's got like 20 or so of his own from back in the day. Let the noobs have some fun, you know? Besides, if he wanted too, he could take that medal from whiny-boy or smirk-merc. Lightsabers? Blasters? They're no use when you fuggin' rip their arms out of their sockets.

    --
    I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.