Slashdot Mirror


Cellphone Radiation May Protect Brain From Alzheimers

We've discussed cellphones and cancer many times. Here's a new angle: reader olddotter sends in a Reuters article suggesting that cellphone radiation may protect the brain from Alzheimer's disease. "At the end of that time, they found cellphone exposure erased a build-up of beta amyloid, a protein that serves as a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's mice showed improvement and had reversal of their brain pathology..."

6 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thank you! Thank you!

    Finally, somebody has been able to point out that "correlation does not imply causation" without using that goddamn phrase.

  2. Re:Now try keeping the mice warm by reverseengineer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is the abstract, but there isn't much mentioned in the abstract beyond what's covered in the press releases.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  3. Re:Choice to Make by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...there's no correlation of cell phones to brain cancer. What coin flipping is necessary? Cell phones are not actually known to cause any health problems by any valid study, and this research strongly suggests that they might help with Alzheimer's. Seems like a pretty good bet to me.

  4. Re:Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, I think you wanted to say "Correlation does not equal causation"

    Correlation often *implies* causation, especially in well designed and executed scientific studies that eliminate most other possible causes. Of course, implying it does not prove it - that is much harder.

  5. Re:A thought that crossed my mind about EM radiati by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why accept this, but not the original arguments regarding microwave radiation?

    Because there isn't any evidence that cellphone use is harmful. Conjecture is useless until tested.

  6. Re:Choice to Make by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not to mention a Danish study covering over 400k people over periods of up to 12 years that showed no correlation at solid confidence intervals.

    http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/98/23/1707