Slashdot Mirror


Cellphone Radiation May Protect Brain From Alzheimers

We've discussed cellphones and cancer many times. Here's a new angle: reader olddotter sends in a Reuters article suggesting that cellphone radiation may protect the brain from Alzheimer's disease. "At the end of that time, they found cellphone exposure erased a build-up of beta amyloid, a protein that serves as a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's mice showed improvement and had reversal of their brain pathology..."

8 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. Hello, Mickey? by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The results were a major surprise and open the possibility of developing a noninvasive, drug-free treatment for Alzheimer's, said lead author Gary Arendash of the University of South Florida.

    He said he had expected cell phone exposure to increase the effects of dementia.

    This is how science is SUPPOSED to work! But don't get your hopes up...

    Many treatments that have shown promise in mice have had little effect on humans.

    I wonder if this affects the non-Alzheimer's "senior moments" as my mother calls them? I wish they'd had cell phones when I was young! Now where'd I put that damned phone???

  2. Re:scary by sunking2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bingo. So much for the argument that the energy is non-ionizing thus cell phones are safe. Assuming this study is factual.

  3. Re:Easily explained by gknoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's an interesting point. As we conquer the lower hanging medical fruit, and prevent the things that used to kill people younger (disease, malnutrition, gum disease, accidents etc), a higher proportion of the people that DO die will be dying because of old age, or of diseases which only tend to affect older people.

  4. Re:scary by dr2chase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, but. Cellphone radiation (.85-1.9Ghz) does not penetrate that far into your body, just as microwave radiation (2.45Ghz) does not penetrate that far into a potato.

    Studies show that mouse heads are much smaller than human heads, therefore they are getting a much larger dose to their brain, for a given external exposure.

  5. Re:Mice by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although in this case, they actually proved causation.

    --
    ...
  6. Re:Mice by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...Except this experiment used mice and does more or less prove causation.....

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  7. Re:A thought that crossed my mind about EM radiati by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why accept this, but not the original arguments regarding microwave radiation?

    Because this is based on a scientific, reproducible study that shows an actual effect, whereas, the claims that there were negative effects were contradicted by all of the scientific, reproducible experiments that were run to test them.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  8. Re:Choice to Make by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That is entirely wrong. Alzheimers isn't the dissolving of brain tissue but growth of plaques, or at least correlated to it. Your analogy is not an oversimplification, but just a completely wrong description of what is happening. In fact, who is to say that the abnormal conditions presented by so much growth doesn't increase the likelihood of cancer and people just die too soon for it to be statistically signifigant. Please do not ever attempt to describe this disease again as you are not only misleading, but apparently compelling enough for an insightful mod.