Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Develops a Transparent OLED Laptop Screen

Dyne09 writes "The Design blog has posted an entry on Samsung's new laptop with a transparent OLED screen. The photos show a dark-tinted and dimly-lit screen that is fully see-through. While the utility of a see-through laptop probably isn't that high for the average user, several medical and industrial industries could greatly augment design work or frame 3-D models over real life in real-time."

148 comments

  1. Transparent OLED isn't new by Karganeth · · Score: 2, Informative

    However, sticking it on a laptop is.

    1. Re:Transparent OLED isn't new by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      True. Sony Ericsson has done it with XPERIA Pureness, not sure what the screen is though.

    2. Re:Transparent OLED isn't new by eric31415927 · · Score: 1

      Ian McKellen (Number 2) had a laptop with a see-through screen in AMC's version of The Prisoner.
      I only remember it from one scene; I am unsure in which of the six episodes (no pun intended) it appeared.
      It looked cool, and I've wanted one ever since.

      Apparently, I can now get one.
      However, I am sure that it won't be a slick as Number 2's.

    3. Re:Transparent OLED isn't new by KIRBY1986 · · Score: 0

      http://www.allbyer.com/ Hi,Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Here are the most popular, most stylish and avant-garde shoes,handbags,Tshirts, jacket,Tracksuit w ect...NIKE SHOX,JORDAN SHOES 1-24,AF,DUNK,SB,PUMA ,R4,NZ,OZ,T1-TL3) $35HANDBGAS(COACH,L V, DG, ED HARDY) $35TSHIRTS (POLO ,ED HARDY, LACOSTE) $16 thanks... For details, please consult http://www.allbyer.com/

  2. Realistic Uses by teeks99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had two ideas come to mind on ways to use this technology (laptop screens don't really seem like a killer feature).

    - Glasses. It would be great to get a screen on the lenses of my sunglasses, most of the time they'd be clear like normal, but info could pop up throughout the day as needed. Or I could sit back and watch a video, and just turn it off if I needed to see something.

    - 3D Displays. If one would take many layers of this together, it would be possible to create a 3D display a couple inches deep that would be able to be viewed without any need for glasses. It would be quite limited to the amount of depth available, but even a small amount could be revolutionary.

    1. Re:Realistic Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would be great to get a screen on the lenses of my sunglasses

      Uh? Move your face next to your screen as close as you wear sunglasses. Do you see anything? Your eyes just can't focus on a screen this close. For this to work you need retinal projection, not a screen.

    2. Re:Realistic Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - 3D Displays. If one would take many layers of this together, it would be possible to create a 3D display a couple inches deep that would be able to be viewed without any need for glasses. It would be quite limited to the amount of depth available, but even a small amount could be revolutionary.

      That's the first thing that came to my mind, and I rushed to post this idea only to find your post already here. :)

      One can stack up a lot of such screen one after the other and display a sliced up picture one slice per screen. The picture will be a scan rather than a normal 2D shot and will be sliced up in Z-direction. The Z resolution will depend on number of slices and also on number of stacked up screens.

      I hope the tech evolves so that we can have true 3D pixels (voxels?) in a transparent cubic monolithic screen. That would display a real 3D picture instead of just an illusion of 3D which present techs do.

    3. Re:Realistic Uses by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      This isn't good for glasses. First problem is the focus issue as another person mentioned, but also the fact that everyone else would be able to see what is being displayed. Do you really want your girlfriend to know you only knew it was her birthday because of the reminder that flashed on your glasses?

      Displays that project onto semi-reflective glasses are better on both counts.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    4. Re:Realistic Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could be used as a big HUD to make all kinds of cheap security, surveillance and gaming devices, just imagine it mounted on a taser, laser, gun...

    5. Re:Realistic Uses by Artifakt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do I see anything? Yes, I'm THAT damned nearsighted, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    6. Re:Realistic Uses by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Combine both into 3d glasses, you give the 3d showing slightly different screen for each eye, Add augmented reality to the mix and you'll have an explosive cocktail. And you can add exrta features like vision enhancement (ok, for that dont need to be transparent, just project camera vision as background) to be able to use them if you are shortsighted

    7. Re:Realistic Uses by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Glasses. It would be great to get a screen on the lenses of my sunglasses, most of the time they'd be clear like normal, but info could pop up throughout the day as needed. Or I could sit back and watch a video, and just turn it off if I needed to see something.

      The problem is that the glasses are so close to your eye that you wouldn't be able to focus on anything displayed on them, and even if you could, the rest of the world would be out of focus as you shifted your focal length so close to your eyes.

      VR headsets, if you remember those, put the screens several inches from the eye, otherwise it would be anatomically impossible to focus on them. Now, if you were projecting light into the eye, you could theoretically manipulate it to make its focal length equal to the focal length of the eye, but that requires somehow measuring the eye's focal length. And even if you could do THAT, an LCD screen doesn't have the ability to do the kind of focusing needed. What would really work is a system of lasers that directly illuminates the retinas, like old vector output displays. But can you imagine putting something like that in a headset?

    8. Re:Realistic Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you can focus on a screen this close with proper optics. Haven't you noticed that there are already head mounted displays just like this?

    9. Re:Realistic Uses by VinylPusher · · Score: 3, Informative

      You noticed the depth of those head-mounted displays? Needed due to all the optics focussing the image into your eyeball (because you're eyes can't manage it due to aforementioned closeness).

    10. Re:Realistic Uses by maxume · · Score: 1

      OLEDs are direct emission, they are not an LCD technology.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:Realistic Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, you can just have an option on the OS controlled from a slider on the side that will vary the focus of the image.
      You can "unfocus" an image to the point of it appearing to be in the distance.

      The retinal projection thing just adds unnecessary bloat to the hardware.

      Either that or you can learn to view things out of focus.
      I've done it ever since school and have been around computers ever since, don't need any glasses thanks to that bright moment back then.

    12. Re:Realistic Uses by ascari · · Score: 1

      If not lap tops, maybe tank tops?

    13. Re:Realistic Uses by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      tube tops...

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    14. Re:Realistic Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try reading something an inch away from your eyes -- you can't, because our eyes can only accommodate to focusing at a minimum distance of 20cm or so.

      You can't just stick these displays in glasses. A complex lens arrangement will be needed before the human eye can focus on whatever is being displayed.
      Unfortunately, this means it will probably not be transparent unless a clever workaround is devised.

    15. Re:Realistic Uses by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      They will have to make it a bit more transparent first - at 40% you'll be unlikely to make out much beyond the first two layers. I doubt thickening the pixels into voxels will be that hard though but to get a decent Z resolution you'll need several hundred layers which will require a very transparent screen.

    16. Re:Realistic Uses by bendodge · · Score: 1

      A few threads above the problem of focusing optics is mentioned. If you have optics to focus your eye on the screen, you cannot see normally. If the point is simply to have 3D glasses, how is this any different than what we have now?

      --
      The government can't save you.
    17. Re:Realistic Uses by blhack · · Score: 1

      Substitute sunglasses with motorcycle helmet.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    18. Re:Realistic Uses by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 1

      The only realistic use that I can think of is finally building a working version of Ed's computer from Cowboy Bebop. http://imgur.com/5SpiR

      And trust me, I've had the SketchUp diagrams for 3 years, waiting for this.

    19. Re:Realistic Uses by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      - Glasses

      - 3D Displays

      Next: stack them together and wear them as glasses

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  3. cool, absolutely. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    there certainly is some geek coolness in having a transparent display on a laptop, although I question the usefulness of it; particularly when one is playing back pr0n on said laptop.

    1. Re:cool, absolutely. but... by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      there certainly is some geek coolness in having a transparent display on a laptop, although I question the usefulness of it; particularly when one is playing back pr0n on said laptop.

      If you have a gf with a pretty face but an ugly body...

    2. Re:cool, absolutely. but... by furball · · Score: 1

      And thus the term Butter Body was born

    3. Re:cool, absolutely. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUTTER FACE
      It all looks good:

      But Her Face!

  4. This does have everyday applications! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the utility of a see-through laptop probably isn't that high for the average user, several medical and industrial industries could greatly augment design work or frame 3-D models over real life in real-time."

    How about a heads-up-display for cars-- you know so I'm not distracted while driving and playing Grand Theft Auto?

    Plus this technology is essential if you want to have Minority Report-like hand-waving technology/aerobics, so people can watch you through the screen as you, as in the movie, copy files onto a disk-like thing and carry 10 feet across the room to another computer. How futuristic!

    1. Re:This does have everyday applications! by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

      You are right, this is the future. Right now we are still struggling with this old concept of sending the data trough the network. It would be much more awesome to stay in front of a screen all the time and occasionally walk to the other computer bringing some data with you. This will absolutely solve the obesity problem. Genius!

    2. Re:This does have everyday applications! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's because they ran out of IP addresses and had to use NAT which prevented them from being able to initiate network connections.

    3. Re:This does have everyday applications! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There needs to be a +1 Sarcastic mod. (And a -1 Sarcastic mod, but that's a fight for another day)

    4. Re:This does have everyday applications! by retchdog · · Score: 1

      It seems to work in the given context. Also it sets up a physical audit trail, and makes it hard to over-distribute sensitive information. Sometimes design is about making it unobtrusively hard to do certain things.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  5. Cool for display pieces by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

    Like meseums, trade shows etc etc, it would really pull people arround them despite only being able to read properly from the one side. Countless movies and TV shows have transparent screens in high tech work places, it's all good as long as it's not too bad on the eyes if it's to be worked with a lot, or if any private data ever needs to be shown it's useless.

    1. Re:Cool for display pieces by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, CSI is going to be able to save some on their special effects budget. Other than that, it's kind of tough to think of an actual application. The summary makes some pretty fuzzy suggestions, but they don't really seem realistic.

    2. Re:Cool for display pieces by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      Or they'll switch to using opaque screens, which will be the new hotness.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  6. How about a tablet/laptop by Sepodati · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How about using this on a hybrid laptop/tablet? Instead of having an mechanical swivel for the screen that can break, just have a transparent screen like this. Open it up and it's a laptop. Shut the laptop and the screen mirrors so it's a tablet now. This is assuming you could get the outside (or back of) the screen to have touch capabilities.

    -John

    1. Re:How about a tablet/laptop by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If prices continue to drop, the same thing could be implemented using two screens (I guess the exterior screen would have other semi-useful applications when the laptop was open).

      Personally, I think thin and cheap are a much bigger deal for OLEDs than semi-transparency.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:How about a tablet/laptop by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I guess that's fine if you like looking at the keyboard behind your screen, and whatever is behind you when in laptop mode.

    3. Re:How about a tablet/laptop by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      good idea. I don' know if a screen can be transparent and touch-enabled at the same time though ?

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    4. Re:How about a tablet/laptop by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      That's true, OLEDs have the potential of being very cheap to produce. If we ever get there it would be much better to just have two standard non-transparent displays on the laptop.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    5. Re:How about a tablet/laptop by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I think the GL-GD900 Crystal, LG's transparent phone, has a see-through touchscreen as a keypad.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    6. Re:How about a tablet/laptop by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Sorry not a touch screen, the numbers are printed on. It is a transparent touch surface I meant to say.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    7. Re:How about a tablet/laptop by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      I want my whole fridge door to be made out of one, with touch screen. I don't really know why though, maybe I could kick my fridge over on its side and watch wide screen movies...

    8. Re:How about a tablet/laptop by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      ...or we keep the transparency so I can put several laptops one behind the other and finally get 'real' transparency for my xterms.

  7. Focus and line of sight by nsrbrake · · Score: 1

    I can't see much use for an overlay unless there is a fixed viewpoint or the display is only used for information that does not need to be synced with what is behind it. Move your head a few centimeters and it'd throw it all askew.

    The other problem I see with this, as someone mentioned glasses is the focal distance. The heads up displays and wearable computers, etc, that I've seen used mirrors and optics to achieve a further distance than trying to focus on the lens of your glasses.

    --

    Bah!
    1. Re:Focus and line of sight by uuddlrlrab · · Score: 1
      --
      Odi profanum vulgus et arceo
    2. Re:Focus and line of sight by nsrbrake · · Score: 1

      That's impressive!

      Unfortunately it only applies to one person and must still be some distance away. While the head tracking and perspective changes shown can certainly be applied to some products, it's still very limited imo. This screen is transparent and I wonder about the possible applications as you can't set the focal distance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accommodation_(eye) A young eye apparently takes 350ms to refocus, I can't say I'd want to use something like this even with head tracking for anything that may require constant switching between the transparent screen and scene behind. I'd love to know more about the possibility of changing the perceived focal distance and the effect of constantly switching between two distances for a length of time.

      --

      Bah!
  8. A bit late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would've been useful back when overhead slide projectors were ubiqutous and video projectors expensive and rare.

  9. In Soviet Russia by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    screen watches you

    -1 Cliche

  10. Cool tech, all they need to do... by s0litaire · · Score: 1

    ... Is make it a touch screen and shrink the components to a "hand size" grip along the side.

    Or

    Like a few others suggested; Stick it in a high end luxuary car's windscreen, no need for the driver to move his eyes from the road to see readouts.
    (Obligitory M$ joke follows!) Just don't let the car windscreen run windows or the phrase "Blue screen of death" might take on a more perminent meaning.... ^_^

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    1. Re:Cool tech, all they need to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a few others suggested; Stick it in a high end luxuary car's windscreen, no need for the driver to move his eyes from the road to see readouts.

      Cars have Head-Up-Displays since 1988 ;-). Although OLED-Displays may of course improve the experience.

    2. Re:Cool tech, all they need to do... by kybred · · Score: 1

      Like a few others suggested; Stick it in a high end luxuary car's windscreen, no need for the driver to move his eyes from the road to see readouts.

      I don't that would work very well. Current HUDs use an optical system to allow the generate imagery to be focused at infinity, that way the pilot/driver doesn't have to refocus between the outside world and the generated image.

    3. Re:Cool tech, all they need to do... by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Except that they won't. Head up displays have to be in focus when your eyes are focussed on the terrain ahead. If you have to refocus your eyes to the windscreen to see the display, it'll probably be distracting more than anything.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  11. It's not transparent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's translucent. It if were transparent then it would be clear, instead it's like a dark tinted piece of glass which isn't that easy to see through if you ask me.

    1. Re:It's not transparent! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's translucent. It if were transparent then it would be clear, instead it's like a dark tinted piece of glass which isn't that easy to see through if you ask me.

      No, translucency prevents seeing details through the medium, such as the glass you'd use in a bathroom window which allows light to pass through but scatters the photons preventing seeing detail. Transparency is a sliding scale, which can allow various levels of light through or even only certain wavelengths (colors) from 100% clear transparent to nearly opaque.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:It's not transparent! by CecilPL · · Score: 1

      It if were transparent then it would be clear

      Transparent means the objects behind the glass are in focus, which they are in this case.

      The amount of light the glass lets through is a separate consideration from the transparency/translucency distinction.

    3. Re:It's not transparent! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      And that property is called "opacity"

    4. Re:It's not transparent! by kai_hiwatari · · Score: 1

      It is 40% transparent not translucent.

    5. Re:It's not transparent! by ascari · · Score: 1

      The word you're looking for is "see-thru".

    6. Re:It's not transparent! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It's translucent. It if were transparent then it would be clear, instead it's like a dark tinted piece of glass which isn't that easy to see through if you ask me.

      It was supposed to be transparent, but if you look at the demo you'll see they're running Windows - Internet Explorer doesn't correctly handle opacity.

      Yes, it's a CSS joke about a CES product...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  12. Avatar by chrysalis · · Score: 1

    Looks like screens in Avatar!

    --
    {{.sig}}
  13. also by snarkh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Car windows, particularly the windshield.

    1. Re:also by kai_hiwatari · · Score: 1

      Considering that it is only 40% transparent, it won't be possible to use it in car windshields.

    2. Re:also by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Use it at the top of the windshield then. for non-vital info (ie: don't replace the instrument cluster)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    3. Re:also by serutan · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's a great idea. Adding an information display to something that needs to be transparent, like a car windshield, seems like a much better application than making something transparent that shouldn't be, like a laptop screen. I'm surprised Samsung didn't learn anything from the public's reaction to transparent GUI windows. They're kind of cool as a novelty for about 5 minutes, but nobody really wants to use them.

    4. Re:also by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Considering that it's a brand-new product, the fact that it's already been successfully produced with 40% transparency means it's likely going to be improved significantly through further development. I fully expect the technology, or one very like it, to eventually see use in car windshields.

    5. Re:also by kai_hiwatari · · Score: 1

      Yes it is very possible. But what I meant was that I don't think it is possible with the current transparency of 40%.

    6. Re:also by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      I didnt catch it it mentioned if the 40% is a technological limit or something they chose to make the screen more visible. A way to adjust the transparancy on the fly would be awesome.

    7. Re:also by robvangelder · · Score: 1

      A police car could see the status of cars as they drive past (speeding / stolen).

      or a radar like in Grand Theft Auto?

    8. Re:also by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      you can adjust transparency with a simple LCD. just adjust the current to fit the level of transparency you need. sort of (but not really) defeats the purpose of an OLED display

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    9. Re:also by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      cost, flexability, brightness are all better with oled

    10. Re:also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder, though. Head-up displays have been around forever and they're still pretty rare in cars despite the big advantage of not having to look down.

    11. Re:also by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Right. You're adding an old school LCD "panel" (like the one used in 1980's digital watches) behind the OLED display to control light transmission (transparency). I doubt flexibility is important in a medical situation or laptop.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    12. Re:also by CyberSaint · · Score: 1

      Ironic when you consider that many of those old school digital watches were LED backlit...

    13. Re:also by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      My old Casio from the 80's had an incandescent bulb for a backlight. Probably half a watt if that. I don't think LEDs became cheap enough to put in low end watches until the mid-90s; in either case that indiglo(w?) electroluminecent stuff was a better backlight anyways. I never saw a white or blue LED in a sub-$100 watch until after 2000

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  14. Nook2 by eightball · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Instead of having LED below the e-ink, put it on top of the e-ink. With no current applied to either, you see the e-ink. When you need to use the faster more colorful tech, make the e-ink whitish and turn on the OLED.

    1. Re:Nook2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's a good idea.

    2. Re:Nook2 by forand · · Score: 1

      This would cause glare since the OLED will need to have something to protect it thus negating the benefits of the e-ink.

    3. Re:Nook2 by eggnoglatte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is too dim to have a purely reflective technology at the back. The OLED is only 40% transparent, any light bouncing off the e-ink has to pass through the OLED twice (once from the light source to the e-ink, and once form the e-ink to the viewer). At the end you only have 16% of the light being reflected, minus whatever the e-ink absorbs. The reflections of the top of the OLED will be brighter than the displayed information from the e-ink.

    4. Re:Nook2 by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Whyever not? Nintendo did it for the original Game Boy Advance.... oh yeah.

    5. Re:Nook2 by Jezza · · Score: 1

      It's only 40% transparent - the effect would be to render the e-ink unreadable (or near unreadable). While I think it's fantastically cool, I can't think of a single good use for the technology. I can think of a couple of bad ones:

      Make it a touch screen, and put it on the door of your microwave oven - now you don't need the panel to the side... still need to put that volume somewhere (that's where the "guts of the microwave are").

      Did I say a couple? I meant one - really weak idea. But yeah it's cool.

      For a laptop? Total nonstarter... do I really want everyone to see what I've got on my screen?! (No, not all the time)

  15. Great!!! by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Greasy smudges on *both* sides of the screen.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Great!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha! I award you 1 internet sir, well played.

  16. How about as an overlayed screen on e-reader? by aodestruction · · Score: 1

    I would actually like to see something like this overlaying the e-ink screen on an e-reader. The LCD would make taking notes, browsing the web, and possibly even watching videos possible for short periods, and when not in use, the e-ink screen would still save on battery life.

  17. "Pay attention to me!" by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Samsung's new laptop with a transparent OLED screen

    And there was much feline rejoicing.

    However, on the issue of privacy, can people on the other side of the screen also see what you have displayed?

    Then again, could it be also be used as a tablet without having to flip the screen?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:"Pay attention to me!" by Jezza · · Score: 1

      I guess you could make a oneway mirror... but really, WHY?!

    2. Re:"Pay attention to me!" by shawb · · Score: 1

      One way mirror wouldn't really work... those require the obscured side to be in relative darkness. Basically, a one way mirror simply reflects enough light that the images of objects behind it are washed out. An OLED screen would put out enough light to be visible.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    3. Re:"Pay attention to me!" by Jezza · · Score: 1

      I guess. Probably still be a lot harder to read though... Still seems like a transparent display isn't very practical, even if it is cool.

  18. How about black? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of the pictures or videos showed the screen displaying anything that was black. Guess we give that up and replace it with "40% transparent gray"

    1. Re:How about black? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I suppose for true black you could add a black & white LCD layer.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  19. Two thoughts. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This could change the game for small tablets; you could hold the tablet on either side and use your fingers behind the screen to manipulate images without obstructing your view of them.

    I've seen variations of such a solution which artificially create a 'finger' effect through graphics with the touch pad on the back of the device, but this would be the real thing.

    Interesting.

    Also. . .

    People are obviously worried about the privacy factor of see-through computer screens, but I could see this being considered a huge plus in the evil corporate work environment; the drones would only be allowed to use laptops where the backside is a window to the front. A lot less Facebook and Farmville would eat into company time that way. Or at least, this may be how the pointy-haired dictator might think when placing bulk-orders for laptops.

    -FL

    1. Re:Two thoughts. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me? I'd get nauseous with a see-through laptop screen.

  20. Car Windshield possibilities by grilled-cheese · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't mind having my vehicle gauges and GPS moved onto my windshield. Additionally, it would be nice to play movies on it too (in park of course) since my car has a reasonable surround sound system and soundproofing.

    1. Re:Car Windshield possibilities by ZosX · · Score: 1

      lots of possibilities. displays mounted sunglasses are out, but displays on windows, windshields, helmet visors, etc are all possible. Imagine if your windows had a temperature reading in the corner. People would like that sort of thing. Heck why not make a whole window an interactive display of some sort (just no touchscreen please).

    2. Re:Car Windshield possibilities by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You might not like it so much when it started to get dark and you effectively couldn't take off your sunglasses.

  21. Minority Report? by lymond01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you combine this with Wii-type motion control, I think you have the photo/video system from Minority Report.

    1. Re:Minority Report? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which looked good, but would have left you with knackered arms the next day.

    2. Re:Minority Report? by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      but then geeks would be build like Cruise ...

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    3. Re:Minority Report? by Jezza · · Score: 2, Funny

      Very short?!

  22. First and Largest? by slifox · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    "Samsung presents world's first and largest transparent OLED laptop at CES"

    If it's the world's first, it's just as much the world's largest as the world's smallest transparent OLED laptop, as well as the brightest and most-dim, the sharpest and most-blurry, etc...

    1. Re:First and Largest? by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I believe the sentence you're trying to tear apart meant two different things:

      (1) This is the world's first transparent OLED laptop.

      (2) This is the world's largest transparent OLED laptop.

      If interpreted that way, it makes sense.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    2. Re:First and Largest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a press release for the world's first transparent OLED laptop, implying that it's also the world's only transparent OLED laptop. if there are no other transparent OLED laptops in the world, then this one is obviously the largest and the smallest too (statement #2 goes without saying; there are no other transparent OLED laptops to compare this against)

      btw nice witty sig

  23. No Bezel-free Screens - Conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This supports my theory that LCD screen manufacturers are conspiring not to produce one without a bezel on (at least) one side, which would dramatically reduce the price they can get for larger screens.

    Dont buy another LCD until they produce a bezel-free one !

  24. yo dawg... by ZosX · · Score: 2, Funny

    I heard you like windows so I made a window that you can display windows with while running windows, so you can have windows in your window.

  25. Automatic window tinting by uuddlrlrab · · Score: 1

    If this is low power enough, you could theoretically use this for the tinting in vehicle windows/windshields or even homes; make it a graduated but adjustable auto-tint that works on how much and/or what wavelengths of light sensors detect entering the cabin or room. The best part is, when you leave your car in the sun, instead of having to struggle with a clumsy sun screen that only protects one window, one button press blocks all the windows, keeping the cabin relatively cool by the time you return.

    --
    Odi profanum vulgus et arceo
    1. Re:Automatic window tinting by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      The rear-view mirror on my Grand Marquis does that when some moron is following me with his high-beam on. And Boeing is using something similar to replace shades in the new 787.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochromic_devices
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochromatic

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    2. Re:Automatic window tinting by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Photoelectrochromic windows and the like have been around for quite awhile. Using OLED's for that effect would be pointless IMO. Wrong tool for the job.

    3. Re:Automatic window tinting by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      How would that work? OLEDs emit light, they don't block light.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    4. Re:Automatic window tinting by uuddlrlrab · · Score: 1

      Photoelectrochromic windows and the like have been around for quite awhile. Using OLED's for that effect would be pointless IMO. Wrong tool for the job.

      How would that work? OLEDs emit light, they don't block light.

      Hrmmm... New idea! If these can be put on a flexible transparent screen, programmable t-shirts! Create and upload your own graphics! Even animations! Next step, programmable, & touch-interactive clothing...

      --
      Odi profanum vulgus et arceo
  26. Its all fun and games until... by LunarEffect · · Score: 2, Funny

    you are playing Left 4 Dead and suddenly you see your mother in law appear among the zombies.

  27. hybrid displays are already in the works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the real problem I have with e-ink is that it is monochrome. i'd rather them adapt the technology to color somehow and make it cost effective. i understand that a lot of books are just simple text, but the ability to have color and layout would add a great deal to e-books. what is so wrong with just using a pdf as an e-book format anyways? (asides from the lack of drm) I mean pdf was designed to be a replacement for postscript anyways. Seems perfect to me for e-books asides from adobe's tight grip on the format.

    1. Re:hybrid displays are already in the works by maxume · · Score: 1

      Reflow.

      (PDF has added support for reflow, but most pdf production is done with a fixed size in mind.)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:hybrid displays are already in the works by aodestruction · · Score: 1

      If you like .pdf, you'll be a big fan of .djvu; basically the same, easier to copy text, and much, much smaller. I have a .djvu math book on my computer, it's got lots of pictures, figures, and roughly 180 pages of text, all at 2.3 mb. I would also like to see color e-ink displays, but I would much rather have a higher contrast ratio instead.

  28. MRI/CAT scanners by mikael · · Score: 1

    A great application would be for medical ultra-sound visualisation. The latest scanners can generate 3D surfaces which can be viewed on a monitor. There was some experimentation with combining LCD screens with mirrors so that a cross-section view from the sensor could be superimposed on top of the location of the actual sensor.

    Imagine if a doctor could slide this screen around a patient and motion sensors could pick up the location of the screen and transform the data from a MRI/CAT scan into a matching projection, all in real-time.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:MRI/CAT scanners by lcampagn · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this has already been done. I saw it in Total Recall like 15 years ago.

    2. Re:MRI/CAT scanners by mikael · · Score: 1

      Some research with VR googles was done eight years ago:

      Ultrasound augmented realityWired had an article just last year

      Total Recall had a giant screen that did an X-ray to just the bones of the person plus metal objects. The latest volume visualization techniques will map all the muscles and major blood vessels, as well as synovial joints.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  29. yep by itomato · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heads-up display, much like the system used in Cadillacs.
    http://cars.about.com/od/cadillac/ig/2008-Cadillac-STS-gallery/2008-Cadillac-STS-HUD.htm

    viewing a map with turn by turn superimposed over the windshield would be killer app

    1. Re:yep by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if that came out the way you intended...

      Or maybe it did.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  30. We all know the first profitable use will be... by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Porn.

    1. Re:We all know the first profitable use will be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already happened... take a look at the 2nd image in the article... it's boobs.

  31. Missing a feature by VinylPusher · · Score: 1

    There doesn't seem to be a great deal of control over the actual transparency. It seems that fully white pixels are as opaque as can be whilst fully black are transparent.

    I can't really see a point in the transparency, but maybe that's just a result of my underactive imagination. Still, if I were designing something to utilise a transparent display, I'd want to hardware and software to support varying transparency using an alpha channel. RGBA really just makes sense to me as something you'd use on a transparent display.

    There's no OS support for such a thing, of course, but apps and drivers could be written to take advantage until OS support were available.

    1. Re:Missing a feature by eggnoglatte · · Score: 1

      There doesn't seem to be a great deal of control over the actual transparency. It seems that fully white pixels are as opaque as can be whilst fully black are transparent.

      It is more likely that all pixels are equally transparent, irrespective of their intensity. It is just that for bright pixels, the emitted ligth is much brighter than the background, so you see the display content, not the background image

      visible brightness = emitted light + 0.4 * background

      If the emitted light is 0, you just see a dim version of the background. If the emitted light is really bright, it dominates the background to the point where you can't see the background at all.

  32. What we really need this for: by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Augmented reality glasses!

    Mark my words! :)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  33. 1995 calling... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Informative

    IBM ThinkPad 755CV had a transparent LCD display (VGA resolution) around 1995. It could be detached from the laptop, and placed on an overhead projector, for making PowerlessPointless-style presentations. This was in the days before projectors were common.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:1995 calling... by Scannerman · · Score: 1

      IBM ThinkPad 755CV had a transparent LCD display (VGA resolution) around 1995. It could be detached from the laptop, and placed on an overhead projector, for making PowerlessPointless-style presentations. This was in the days before projectors were common.

      several companies had these.

      and there were a lot of external units for use on OHP's

      "affordable" (The first one I bought was $5k+ ) projectors made them obsolete.

    2. Re:1995 calling... by Nirvelli · · Score: 1

      But the OLED has its own built-in light source, so no backlight is needed for direct-viewing in the dark. Isn't that the big deal here?

  34. Safety plus fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just combine it with a naked scanner. No more invasive body checks, just walk by that smiling security officer behind a computer screen. Oh wait. It'd better be one-way.

  35. Transparent screens are old news... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    Back when overhead projectors were the dominant method of displaying information before a large audience (y'know the ones you put clear sheets of plastic on and wrote with a marker), before powerpoint and before projectors that connected to your VGA port. IBM came out with the Thinkpad 755CV in which you could remove the backcover of the screen and then place the screen over the light on your overhead projector.

    A snap-off screen panel gives the new ThinkPad 755CV the ability to "piggyback" atop many types of standard overhead projectors. Remove the rear panel and the images on the computer's screen become a see-through "slide show" projected on a wall or screen by the overhead's lamp. The contents of any software program or presentation can easily be shared with a group of people.

    Back in 1995...

    1. Re:Transparent screens are old news... by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Back in CEGEP (college) we had something similar. It was a stand-alone transparent LCD monitor that was used with a overhead projector. That was for Autocad R12, so around '94 if memory seems right.

      The difference is OLED screens emit their own light. thus no need for a backlight. I'm wondering if we'll still have glowing apples when Apple switches to OLED.

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  36. HOLD IT! by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

    You watch All My Children!?

    Dude...

  37. It is transparent! by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

    1 a (1) : having the property of transmitting light without appreciable scattering so that bodies lying beyond are seen clearly

    --
    I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
  38. Old news, been out for years by noidentity · · Score: 1

    These things have been out for years. Check out all the pictures people have taken of their laptops with transparent displays! Most are 100% transparency as well.

    1. Re:Old news, been out for years by marciot · · Score: 1

      You do realize that most of those are photography tricks where someone has set their desktop backgrounds to be a photo of the background and taken the a picture from just the right angle?

    2. Re:Old news, been out for years by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Yes. The lack of "funny" mod tells me I dead-panned my original post too strongly. Oh well.

  39. Tablet technology? by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe a laptop with this screen could operate as a tablet when the lid is closed.

  40. Ideas, a wonderful thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a great example of information wanting to be free, you guys have all these great ideas about the applications of the technology and have no qualms spreading them. Now, someone just has to take your idea, copyright it, and then patent it, and then it's no longer free. Beautiful world we live in, eh?

  41. Defeats the purpose by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Plus it completely defeats the purpose of the transparency: the optics will make you extremely short sighted so you would not be able to see anything further away.

    1. Re:Defeats the purpose by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      In theory one could predistort the image on the screen in such a way as to appear correct when focusing further away, right? In practice that may not be feasible, but I believe theory supports that.

      If such technology could be mastered thing of the advantages. Simple heads-up display style AR would be trivial, as would non-movement synchronized 3D projections. (By adding a polarizing layer (good sunglasses should probably already have that) and a liquid crystal layer, one could even allow blacking out the real world, and using the glasses as a 3D display, not unlike the existing head-mounted 3d displays, but a heck of a lot thinner.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  42. Advertising by zogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They'll wind up using this for advertising. Instead of regular "dumb" windows in stores they will all be "smart windows" with changeable ads, visible from both sides of the glass.

  43. Beware of using with compiz. by jafo · · Score: 1

    I tried a beta version of this display with compiz and my windows set to transparent, and I almost blew my mind. Almost.

    Sean

    1. Re:Beware of using with compiz. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried a beta version of this display with compiz and my windows set to transparent, and I almost blew my mind. Almost.

      Sean

      I tried reading your post with compiz and my windows set to transparent, and I almost laughed. Almost.

      Anonymous

  44. Video Conferencing by Orphaze · · Score: 1

    One good use that could result from a technology like this would be screen-embedded cameras for video conferencing.

    Anyone who has ever VC-ed with someone before knows that the experience is severely lacking for one important reason: eye contact. Even with a modern built-in camera just a half inch above the screen, it is obvious that the person you are talking to you is looking at their screen and not you. In my opinion, this is show stopper, and it really makes the experience no better than a phone conversation, if not worse.

    A camera that was embedded in the center of a screen, with the other person's video stream centered on top of it, would fix this problem once and for all. No bulky teleprompter-like screen attachment necessary.

  45. Augmented Reality by marciot · · Score: 1

    This would be awesome for augmented reality in a hand held device. If you could make it so you could look through it to your surroundings, and overlay useful information. The tricky part would be tracking where the user's eyes were relative to the device so you could properly position the overlay.

  46. Absolutely. but...the necessity lies elsewhere by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Yes I am talking about beer mugs. Make her look pretty even before finishing your first drink...

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  47. Light rays have a direction by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    In theory one could predistort the image on the screen in such a way as to appear correct when focusing further away, right?

    Wrong. Nice try but light rays have a direction as well which will be lacking if you simply reproduce an image on an OLED screen and so they will not be bend in the same way by a lens. If you have a screen which can control both the direction and intensity of light from each pixel then you could make a very nice 3D display.

  48. ki detection by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 1

    VEGETA! What does the laptop say about his power level??

    --
    http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png