Futuristic Sex Robots Now Just "Sex Robots"

High-C writes "With apologies to Futuristic Sex Robotz, the future is here, and her name is Roxxxy. Truecompanion.com has revealed their answer to the Real Doll, and it looks nice. The site is short on details, pictures, pricing info, but wow." NOTE: some of the above links are not work-safe, for many values of work. I stopped by this exhibit today at the AVN Expo (not officially a part of CES, but by curious coincidence scheduled to coincide; the old saw that porn drives tech isn't without merit). Roxxxy, though, was rather unsexily posed on a couch, not moving a bit — downright creepy, in fact.

Comments

Re:O RLY?

[Ethanol-fueled]

Sad part is that the dolls probably carry on more interesting conversation than most real Females do, even without accounting for individual taste.

Re:O RLY?

[DakotaSmith]

Here's the reason men like me will buy products like this:

In general, Western women are just a pain in the ass to be around.

Western women make absolutely lousy companions. They're typically happy to be going somewhere or doing something she wants to do, but will drag her feet and complain when situation is reversed.

Western women also tend to view men as little more than a human wallet. One need go no further than any "family law" court to prove that this is so, but Western women display this attitude constantly. Try unexpectedly not paying your date's way and see if she goes on another.

Worse, if a man is married and loses his job, the marriage immediately hits the rocks. If he's out of work for long, it's over. "For richer or poorer," my ass.

Oh, and if you haven't noticed, the physical beauty of a woman is in direct proportion to the income of her boyfriend or husband. Frankly, I'm unclear why this isn't anything other than socially-acceptable prostitution.

Western women no longer have any skills that would make them assets as life companions. They microwave food just like men, keep house just like men, and have little skill in raising well-adjusted children. And before you go nuts, realize that I'm not suggesting that a woman's place is in the home. I'm simply pointing out that they no longer have the skills that made them an asset in the past. They're at best a neutral addition to the household; in general, they're just liabilities.

In general, women aren't any fun sexually, as they tend to just lay there. This continues to amaze me in the Internet age: any woman who cares to look will find a multitude of "how-to" guides in the form of porn. There are some exceptions, but in general women do nothing in bed. And I own and use a Hitachi Magic Wand on my lovers, so I won't buy the idea that it's my performance that's at fault. If you can't give a woman orgasms with a Magic Wand, you need to adjust your drool cup.

I'm middle-aged, and I've been waiting for a decent gyndroid (the female version of an android) for about five years. That was when, after a lifetime watching women misbehave, I finally gave up on finding a rational, well-adjusted woman to share my life.

In all seriousness, when you break it down, the disadvantages of having a relationship with a woman far outweigh the advantages. Indeed, Western women have deteriorated so badly that unless you want to procreate, they're nothing but trouble. I already have children and have no desire for more, so what can a woman offer me that a gyndroid can't?

And as to the cost ... well, I don't know the pricing of this particular item, but I've looked at RealDolls and they're very pricey. However, think of it this way:

A man can expect to pay in the vicinity of a hundred bucks for a nice date -- the kind that impresses women and leads them to want to spend more time with you. That's every date. Then there's marriage and the inevitable use of a man's money in amounts that -- over time -- would astound a person.

If a good gyndroid cost $10,000, it would be considerably less than a man spends on a woman when amortized over ten or fifteen years. Frankly, a gyndroid would be a real bargain.