Slashdot Mirror


$199 Freescale Tablet Design Runs Chromium OS

Charbax writes "This is an extensive video interview with Freescale's manager of software development about their integration of the Chromium OS onto their ARM Cortex A8 i.MX51-based $199 Tablet reference design. It seems to run smoothly and fast with multiple tabs. There's no touch screen support yet, so input is done through a USB keyboard and mouse for now, but the WiFi drivers are fine. Freescale is also demonstrating Android and Ubuntu versions. Those have a 3G SIM card reader built-in, an HDMI output and 720p video playback. The question is: will they be able to support Chrome browsing at full speed on the most JavaScript- and Flash-intensive websites and support a large amount of opened tabs?" The demonstration of the Chromium tablet begins at about 11:20 into the video. The Android and Ubuntu versions are displayed earlier.

10 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Flash by randallman · · Score: 4, Informative

    In response to all of the questions of the form "can it play flash". It's up to Adobe, not so much the hardware manufacturer. A manufacturer can included chips to offload video processing, etc., but if Adobe doesn't take advantage of the hardware capabilities, Flash won't play well.

    Flash is terrible on everything but Windows. My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with Ubuntu 9.04 can play 720p nicely using mplayer, but can't play 480p acceptably in flash. The problem is Adobe's exclusive control over the flash player. We need a real standard, hence the debate over html5 video codec inclusion.

    So please realize more times than not that the shortcoming is with flash and Adobe, not with the hardware.

    1. Re:Flash by clang_jangle · · Score: 2, Informative

      My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with Ubuntu 9.04 can play 720p nicely using mplayer, but can't play 480p acceptably in flash.

      My 3 year old Pentium-M laptop with FreeBSD 8.0 plays flash just fine via the linux-f10-flashplugin10 port -- we don't even get a native libflashplayer.so. Sounds like you have an Ubuntu problem, not a flash problem...

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
  2. Re:Flash + ARM? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Informative

    ``I didn't think you could run the flash player at all on ARM chips.''

    Think again: Adobe and ARM Accelerate Flash and AIR for ARM Platforms

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  3. Re:Question by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It has a touchscreen. It does not yet have (working) drivers for the touch screen.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. Re:Flash + ARM? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Adobe now supports Flash on a variety of ARM chips. The i.MX515 in TFA was launched with a version of Flash, supported by Adobe, and provided to OEMs right from the start.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  5. Re:Flash + ARM? by oh2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Nokia N900 has an ARM processor and full Flash support, v9.4 currently and 10.1 is coming in a few weeks according to Nokia. Its quite doable.

    --

    Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

  6. Re:That's missing the point by iammani · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's neat to see that Chromium OS is going to be light. (Yeah, Linux is also. As is mobile version of Windows. But more options is still nice.)

    Er, actually Chromium is Linux.

  7. Re:Question by pj81381 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hey, this thing is (supposedly) $199 and has a touch screen!

    At least the exact same tablets running Android and Ubuntu do. At about 11:34, Mr. Subramanian says "Chromium today does not support touch screen...". So it's not the tablet hardware which doesn't include a touch screen, but the build of Chromium they're using.

  8. Work around Flash by loudmax · · Score: 3, Informative

    The best solution to working around Flash video that I've worked out it to use the Video download helper Firefox plugin, then play the videos in Mplayer. It has pretty good support for Youtube and its many imitators. Unfortunately, it doesn't handle copy-protected stuff so it won't work with the full length movies on Youtube or anything on Hulu. It is an extra step to download the video before playing it, but the add-on makes it pretty easy, so I find it worth the hassle if I'm going to watch anything more than a few minutes long.

    I haven't seen anything approximate ported to Chrome yet. Hopefully it'll get one soon... or better yet the <Video> tag becomes universally supported even sooner.

    --
    KTHXBYE
  9. Re:Why not take the next step by slim · · Score: 4, Informative

    Firefox supports Ogg/Theora/Vorbis.
    Safari, iPhone, Android support H.264,AAC,MP4
    Chrome supports all of the above.

    http://diveintohtml5.org/video.html#what-works

    If you're a web site developer, it's probably best to host both, and have your pages detect what the browser supports.