Slashdot Mirror


Ballmer Hits 10th Anniversary As Microsoft CEO

bednarz writes "Ten years ago on Jan. 13, 2000, Microsoft's Bill Gates turned over the CEO reins to Steve Ballmer. Back in 2000, Microsoft was still under threat of being broken up by the Department of Justice. Today, Ballmer is trying to meld enterprise and cloud computing. He has spent the past decade working through lawsuits, mergers, acquisitions, competitive battles and, of course, new software including Windows 7, which could become the legacy of his leadership at Microsoft. Not that we'll ever forget Ballmer's 'developers, developers, developers' rant."

14 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. but..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did they mention his important work in the field of chairodynamics?

    or

    How about his charitable donations of 288,000 pints of human sweat?

    1. Re:but..... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      You misspelled chairitable.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:but..... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny how Vista is oddly missing in that list of achivements. But then again, there are times when a hole in your CV is preferable to being truthful.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:but..... by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does anyone have numbers to compare from 10 years ago?

      Revenue should scale up with inflation and standard growth. I'm particularly curious about profit margin, and market share.

      In this past decade Microsoft lost market share, presided over the Xbox's massive hardware failures, and the massive failure of Windows mobile. IE went from utterly dominating (95% plus) market share to having less than 50% market share in some areas. Most people expect Firefox to overtake the majority of market share in all markets. Microsoft has also lost market share in search, got blasted by the EU, and had to back-pedal on several key strategies.

      All those things go on his resume.

      Microsoft also has to look where the future takes them.

      A linux netbook with a random distro without many packages, and no big brand name behind it may not set the world on fire. But when Best Buy starts selling Chrome OS netbooks with a big Google brand on it, Microsoft will start shitting themselves.

      Google has a lot of pieces they've yet to put together, but when they do, Microsoft's business model in several markets may suddenly shrivel and dissapear. Microsoft won't disappear overnight because they're diversified, but a company can rule a specific market one day, and then disappear the next if they're not careful.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  2. Was it only me by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was it just me who read the headline "Ballmer Hits..." and my mind automatically filled in with " ...XXX With A Chair" ?

    --
    This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
  3. Come on, he's a Friend of Linux... by smitty777 · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...NOT. According to him, it's

    " a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches.

    It must fly in the face of every business practice he's come up with.

    --
    "Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish"
    Albert Einstein
  4. Re:Chairs??? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Or flying chairs.

    After Bill Gates resigned, many of the Microsoft middle managers came up to Steve Ballmer's office to talk about all the problems they had under Gates. Sensing the opportunity for change, nearly all of them said, at some point, "I simply won't stand for this anymore". Ballmer just got tired of this after a while and decided to manage more efficiently.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  5. Re:Chairs??? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even when he will eventually resign, he will still be remembered as the chairman of Microsoft. Now THAT's a legacy!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Re:Also titled by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hate it when you liberals are always so negative. Why can't you rephrase it to make it sound positive. Like, "say what you want about GWB, but you have to give him that: He accomplished a decade of failure in just 8 years."

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Re:Moron by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because he got that job (from hist long-year friend und co-partner), doesn't qualify him to be _not_ a moron.

    Bastard? Sociopath? Arsehole? Prick?- maybe.
    Moron? I'd say no. A *moron* would have fouled it all up somehow, either not getting the job in the first place or not retaining it for the last 8 years. He didn't.

    --
    This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
  8. Re:Chairs??? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's true. Slashdot has modded up jokes about flying chairs every day for the last five years.

    "He threw a chair at it!"

    HAHAHAHA HO HO HO HO HEEE HEE HEE HEE HEE.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  9. Re:10 years of change by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Vista and 7 changed the playfield. Apple came along with OS X, and Windows started to compete for home users market share, and somewhere on the line pretty much forgot the business users. The OS is no longer clearly aimed for business users.

    Oh yeah, I remember clearly when they threw away Active Directory, File Sharing, Smart-card Authentication, Shadow Copy and all of those other business-class features that were just slowing home users down. Or... maybe you're smoking crack.

    You can't just say things, you have to actually justify them. What makes you say that Windows no longer has a business focus? Please cite specific examples.

    Vista was a disaster pretty much every way you look at it,

    Not my way of looking at it. I call it, "rational human being who doesn't make decisions based on Slashdot or hype." I'm not going to say that Vista is the best product ever, but it's not even close to Microsoft's worst OS.

    Part of the problem is the overly simplifying things and forcing old reliable tree-browsing into libraries.

    I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. I suspect you also do not.

    Library-like browsing is fine, if you want to watch photographs or browse mp3 collections at home, but it doesn't really work for corporate cases.

    What is "library-like browsing?" Why doesn't it work for corporate cases? (You also can't just pull terms out of your ass and use them as if everybody else knows exactly what you mean.)

    Fileservers are easier to use if you can logically follow the treeview.

    What exactly is Vista or Windows 7 doing to prevent you from logically following the treeview?

    Is your entire complaint centered around the fact that you've never bothered to check "Navigation Pane" from the Organize menu in an Explorer window? I hope that's not the case, because you'd end up looking like a real idiot.

    (yes 7 has treeview too, but it sucks compared to old xp model)

    Sucks how? Again, you have to actually justify statements like this... you can't just spout crap out of your noisehole and expect me to take it seriously.

  10. Re:Ballmer must *love* developers by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 4, Informative

    After all, VB6 couldn't be automatically upgraded to VB.net.
    That's because just about every detail of how VB6 worked was a consequence of either how older MS Basics going back to 1975 had worked (the bizarre boolean rules) or how COM works. The different memory model alone would make it nearly impossible to automatically upgrade projects directly, and is why Office (still COM) Automation still doesn't work well under .Net. VB.Net is essentially just an alternate syntax of C#, plus optional parameter support.

    Neither C# nor VB.net forms projects can be automatically upgraded to ASP.net
    You mean automatically converting WinForms projects? How could that possibly work? WebForms already denies the basic properties of the web way too much.

    Yes, we're all enjoying the benefits of that wonderful CIL. It's just provided the folks on the ground *so* many benefits like, um, er...
    Real inheritance.
    Collections other than arrays and "Collection".
    Fewer arbitrary "you can't combine these features because we didn't think of that" restrictions.
    Better performance without the COM reference-counting overhead.
    Much better string performance if you learn how to use it.
    Worthwhile built-in libraries.
    Dynamic form controls without invisible "control array" seeds.
    Initial values in variable declarations.
    Not so much of this kinda thing: "Left(Upper(LTrim(RTrim(txtStuff))), Len(LTrim(RTrim(txtStuff)))-1)".
    XCopy installation.
    Console app support.
    IDE tooltips showing any expression's current value.

  11. Re:It seems to me .... by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    he doesn't know jack about the engines and also has no idea what tools to use.

    When all you have is a chair, all your problems look like developers.