Slashdot Mirror
Airport Access IDs Hacked In Germany
teqo writes "Hackers belonging to the Chaos Computer Club have allegedly cloned digital security ID cards for some German airports successfully which then allowed them access to all airport areas. According to the Spiegel Online article (transgoogleation here), they used a 200 Euro RFID reader to scan a valid security ID card, and since the scanner was able to pretend to be that card, used it to forge that valid ID. Even the airport authorities say that the involved system from 1992 might be outdated, but I guess it might be deployed elsewhere anyway."
The kit used, a Proxmark 3 cost ~$470 before P&P but they were been sold at 26c3 for 200 cash-in-hand.
Sounds like somebody who was at the conference has an hour or two to kill in the airport and decided to play with their new toy.....
And to anybody saying you could not get it past security, I got my Netbook, Proxmark3, SIM simulator, a few FON and a big of random USB,wireless & BT dongles past them it no issues {except some of the stuff was removed from my carry-on bay and was double x-rays}.
The comments so far incredibly miss the points : one of the main fear of airport authorities is that an unknown individual could access restricted zone where plenty of bomb-planting occasions can occur. With this badge you can apparently access the luggage compartment of a plane without being checked for explosives.
At a time where authorities try to impose ridiculous devices like the body scanner and that waiting lines become so long that trains become a viable option to national flights, it is good to point out that they have so many flaws left.
Clearly, "anti-terrorism" is not handled by competent people who think they will have to stop competent terrorists.
The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
You're right. And I wonder why.
Here we are, creating security theater after security theater, invading flyer's privacy from background checks to real physical intimate invasions, but we don't care that someone could easily access all restricted areas of an airport.
Ever thought that it would, from a terrorist's point of view, be much more interesting to blow up Heathrow, CDG or Kennedy airport than some petty little plane? Can you imagine the possibilities of having access to the airport's fuel tanks (and I'm not even thinking of such unimportant things like simply causing an explosion there. Think big! How about filling planes with fuel that clogs the engines so they come down unexpectedly. 3 planes hitting some towers? How about 300?), or how about access to the catering pool (I think we all saw the catstrophy movies from the 70s where spoiled food knocked out the pilots)?
And that's something I've been thinking up within the 5 minutes of writing this posting, with no intent to actually strike against an airport. Now think of the possibilities of a terrorist with his mind set on something like that and a few months of planning time.
If that whole scenario shows something, then that we are NOT adequately protected. And no, that doesn't mean we need more security theater. It means that the whole shit is worth jack! You cannot secure a system that is inherently insecure. There are way too many ways to attack to secure them all.
I'm also wondering why they're so worried about airports. There are way more much easier ways to execute acts of terror than in such a limited environment. But maybe it's just that we want to protect people rich enough to actually fly. Tells you something 'bout who's important and who's not.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Sounds like somebody who was at the conference has an hour or two to kill in the airport and decided to play with their new toy.....
The guy who did it is Karsten Nohl, the same guy who deciphered GSM encryption lately. He also reverse engineered the "secret" MIFARE Classic cipher some time ago.
They build false fears in our minds and use cheap solution to tell us we are protected. But in the end we don't gain any real security while we lose our privacy at every step.
Today the highest life hazard are our cars. How much money is invested in road security?
Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
They x-ray your bags before you can get on a long-distance train in Spain. They don't yet make you walk through a metal detector, though.
The only people it hits hard are the rich, or folk who have to travel for work. The general public can sneer at them complaining because they deserve it for being able to fly that often.
Having to travel for work is often far from a privilege, although I suppose that people who haven't done it may think it's glamorous.