Analyst Estimates AT&T Needs To Spend $5B To Catch Up
itwbennett writes "The public's perception of AT&T's network is poor and declining, apparently because of real shortcomings when compared with Verizon Wireless and Sprint Nextel,' says Gerard Hallaren, director of research at TownHall Investment Research. 'AT&T's capital expenditures on its wireless network from 2006 through September 2009 totaled about $21.6 billion, compared with $25.4 billion for Verizon and $16 billion for Sprint (including Sprint's investments in WiMax operator Clearwire). Over that time, Verizon has spent far more per subscriber: $353, compared with $308 for AT&T,' Hallaren said. 'Even Sprint has outspent AT&T per subscriber, laying out $310 for network capital expenditure.' All this means AT&T has a choice, says Hallaren: 'spend or suffer.'"
These numbers are misleading. AT&T doesn't need to spend as much money to be as productive in infrastructure expansion as its CDMA competitors because their engineers can talk and surf at the same time.
Calling out bogus battery capacity claims.
For certain patchy values of Canada.
If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
But my iPhone would probably just drop the call.
SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
<title>Analyst: AT&amp;T needs to spend US$5B to catch up | ITworld</title>
That title is so &ed it goes to 11.