Slashdot Mirror


Supreme Court Rolls Back Corporate Campaign Spending Limits

lorenlal writes "The Supreme Court of the United States must have figured that restrictions on corporate support of candidates was a violation of free speech, or something like that." From the AP story linked above: "By a 5-4 vote, the court on Thursday overturned a 20-year-old ruling that said corporations can be prohibited from using money from their general treasuries to pay for campaign ads. The decision, which almost certainly will also allow labor unions to participate more freely in campaigns, threatens similar limits imposed by 24 states."

4 of 1,070 comments (clear)

  1. I for one... by Delwin · · Score: 5, Funny

    welcome our new Disney overlords.

  2. Re:Constitution? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then perhaps we should amend it! In the meantime, free speech (and a free press) isn't just a good idea: it's the law.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  3. Re:Constitution? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Funny

    then clearly the Constitution is defective.

    You're thinking about this the wrong way. The constitution is not defective. Finally, all this anti-corporate ideology is on the wane, and true social equality will soon be reached when we get a corporation as a supreme court justice.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  4. Re:Constitution? by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're discriminated against in the hiring process as well. I can't tell you how many hiring committees I've been on where we've only hired actual human beings. It's pervasive! I say we need affirmative action for corporations; level the playing field a bit, at least until we see more and more corporations in positions of power at corporations. True fact: nearly all corporate CEOs are actual human beings rather than corporations (Steve Jobs is the exception here).