Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Patches "Google Hack" Flaw In IE
An anonymous reader writes "As expected, Microsoft has issued an out-of-band security patch to address a remote code execution hole in Internet Explorer that was used in the recent Chinese attacks disclosed by Google. Ars Technica has all the download links you need."
Rebooting to upgrade a browser is at least five levels of wrong!
...this does not apply to Mac users, because Mac's don't suffer from drive-by downloads and other malware. My PPC G5 running Safari on Snow Leopard is rock-solid and secure.
I take it you haven't heard the news? Granted, it's much more secure...but not secure.
People think that Mac's are expensive, but the safety and security alone are reasons to justify the high price. The sleek, advanced looks are just the icing on the cake.
Uh...OSX is what is safe and secure...not Apple hardware. Install OSX onto a hackintosh and it will be just as secure as your overpriced "icing". Macs ARE expensive, and the low-cost of upgrading to Snow Leopard just proves that you are paying far too much for hardware, not the software that it utilizes.
Come on. If you are gonna fanboy for a single system, at least get your facts straight.
Living With a Nerd
This is a bit off-topic but I have nowhere else to post this. I have attempted to post the reports that Google has backed down in China and re-enabled search result filtering in Google.cn despite of the lack of REAL actions from the Chinese government in the last two days, but /. editors keep refusing to put this relevant in the headline. Right, how can we be critical of our new found American hero defending the precious "freedom" and fighting the evil China? How can a hero backing down to the evil China? Hero can't make fundamental principle error, or you are not allowed to know when it does. Can someone find a way to post this news report (which can be verified search "June 4" in google.cn and which I can't find any English language sources)?!
No it goes to show how fast MS can release a patch (and out of their normal cycle) when face with a large amount of negative PR. Normal vulnerabilities usually have to wait til Patch Tuesday. But when Google announces that IE was to blame in a large number of attacks, both France and Germany advises their citizens not to use IE for a while, MS better patch it sooner than later.
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
It only proves my point. MS sat on the bugs for months and only released a patch after public disclosure by Google. How much longer would have they sat on them if it wasn't for the bad PR.
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
Removing IE is easy, its a wrapper GUI around a browser engine. Delete iexplore.exe, there you deleted IE.
The rendering engine is in a shared DLL thats used by just about everything now days, even if the app doesn't use the renderer directly, the built in help system is HTML based and uses the shared library for its renderer.
Its also used by HTML style dialogs, which are basically dialogs that use HTML to define the layout rather than the old style dialog resources.
This isn't really different from any other modern OS which uses HTML all over the place. I can't think of any modern desktop OS that doesn't have massive dependancies on an HTML renderer.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
No, what slashdot needs are editors: people who read and correct errors in written works prior to publication.
How much longer would have they sat on them if it wasn't for the bad PR.
Stupid question. Answer is of course "Forever!".
Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
Ooooh, we all talk like com techs. Aren't we all so clever?
Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
>>Nothing quite like two national governments recommending against using your product to raise the priority of fixing the problem
Nothing like people actually switching browsers in droves because of the warnings to raise the priority of fixing it. Now that they've switched, what are the chances of those lost users switching back?
Why would you walk away from your pc for more than 5 minutes without saving anyhow. Comments like this just make me wanna scream dumbass.
Snow Leopard will not run on a PPC. Nice try.
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
well you can't complain, you're getting IE for free
It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.