Slashdot Mirror


Judge Lowers Jammie Thomas' Damages to $54,000

An anonymous reader writes "Judge Michael Davis has slashed the amount Jammie Thomas-Rassett is said to owe Big Music from almost $2,000,000 to $54,000. 'The need for deterrence cannot justify a $2 million verdict for stealing and illegally distributing 24 songs for the sole purpose of obtaining free music. Moreover, although Plaintiffs were not required to prove their actual damages, statutory damages must still bear some relation to actual damages.' The full decision (PDF) is also available."

9 of 390 comments (clear)

  1. Re:My favorite part by Applekid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Treble damages? Were the shared songs THAT bad?

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  2. Re:Some relation? by mhajicek · · Score: 2, Funny

    What if you could prove negative damages? Exposing more people to the music makes it more likely that people will buy merch and attend concerts in the future. Then the RIAA would have to pay HIM.

  3. Re:My favorite part by Ossifer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait until they apply bass damages...

  4. Re:My favorite part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Trouble with trebles?

  5. Re:My favorite part by Ossifer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you go around telling kids there's no Santa Claus?

  6. Re:Actual damages are 35 cents per work by EvanED · · Score: 5, Funny

    The judge seemed to indicate he thought $54,000 was still high, how did he settle on that number?

    Hmmm, if only he wrote some sort of opinion that explained his reasoning...

  7. Re:My favorite part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They were MP3s - of course the treble was damaged

  8. Re:My favorite part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Treble damages? Were the shared songs THAT bad?

    No, they rolled a natural 20 twice in a row while determining damage.

  9. Re:My favorite part by Psion · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow. Looks like someone just found out they paid too much money for their house.