Skydiver To Break Sound Barrier During Free-Fall
Hugh Pickens writes "Over fifty years ago, American Joe Kittinger made history by leaping from a balloon at 102,800 ft, and although many have sought to repeat the feat, all have failed. Now, BBC reports that Austrian extreme sportsman Felix Baumgartner will try to break the long-standing record for the highest ever parachute jump, skydiving from a balloon sent to at least 120,000 ft, and it is likely that 35 seconds into in his long free-fall of more than five minutes, he will exceed the speed of sound — the first person to do so without the aid of a machine. 'No-one really knows what that will be like,' says Baumgartner. Although challenges in the endeavor include coping with freezing temperatures and ultra-thin air, a key objective for Baumgartner will be to try to maintain a good attitude during the descent and prevent his body from going into a spin and blacking out. 'The fact is you have a lot of different airflows coming around your body; and some parts of your body are in supersonic flow and some parts are in transonic flow. What kind of reaction that creates, I can't tell you,' adds Baumgartner."
So I guess I'm not the only one to think this guy is going to die doing this stunt.
Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
Just like car racing, I want to watch.
Working on new views of old physics at http://VisualPhysics.org
That bit about Superman falling for you? That was a dream. :)
http://alternatives.rzero.com/
Failed?!? How can you fail that? Throw yourself self off the balloon and miss the ground?
/greger
It's really going to hurt.
I'm just going to say... Best Darwin award EVER!
... will he bounce?
For one thing we can pretend we're in an alternate timeline where the one from last year never happened.
If my calculations are correct, it's 623 ergs/quartic coloumb-acre.
You must be a big hit at the parties.
"linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
If you fart while exceeding the speed of sound, will it make a noise?
__ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
I think this has to be considered as a Darwin Awards nominee...
<response voice="Picard">But I see 11 Star Trek films!</response>
I hope to god he's not wearing a red shirt.
Because ST11 sucked so hard it is equivalent to -2 Star Treks.
What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
The Difference between a bad golfer and a bad skydiver? one goes *Whack*... "D@mn". the other goes "D@mn"...Whack.
I prefer to say there's only been one Star Trek film, and exist in an alternate timeline where the one from last year is the *only* one that ever happened.
He will need a very pointy hat.
Ezekiel 23:20
You never do until they leave. :(
Sheared off at 750mph. Blood loss followed by blackout. If "he" survives he won't get many dates. Just date Lorena Bobbit next time. Same result no balloons.
Jeez, has no one ever heard of a back of an envelope calculation? Here, let me blow your mind: Pi = 3
@humanity: *facepalm*
Actually, I'm fairly sure you miscounted. When I looked over that list, I only counted 8.
Star Trek: The Motion Picture (Star Trek 1)
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (Star Trek 2)
Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (Star Trek 3)
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (Star Trek 4)
Star Trek V: The Final Frontier FNORD (Star Trek 5)
Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (Star Trek 6)
Star Trek: Generations (Star Trek 7)
Star Trek: First Contact (Star Trek 8)
Star Trek: Insurrection FNORD (Star Trek 9)
Star Trek: Nemesis FNORD (Star Trek 10)
Star Trek (2009 - Star Trek 11)
See? There's a mysterious gap between 4 and 6 that I've never been able to figure out, but you can't seriously mean that the new movie gets a +2 added to its sequel number just because it's a reboot.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have a sudden urge to go shopping.
Range Voting: preference intensity matters