Intego's "Year In Mac Security" Report
david.emery notes the release of Intego's "Year In Mac Security" report (PDF), adding: "Mac OS X and iPhones that haven't been jailbroken fare pretty well (although vulnerabilities exist, there's not been a lot of exploitation). Apple does come in for criticism for 'time to fix' known vulnerabilities. Jailbroken iPhones are a mess. The biggest risk to Macs are Trojan horses, often from pirated software."
Really, the main problem is that jailbreak processes don't try to change your default root password. So the vulnerability is that Apple supplied a default root password (that isn't workable without jailbreak), and the haxx0rs remove the protection but fail to force user to change or randomize (and remember/show to user) that password.
Nothing bizarre about that.
Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
This is basically 7 total pages:
* first couple pages on installing bitorrent'd software
* Page 4 and 5 about people who installed openssh on their jailbroken iphones and didn't change their passwords
* last page has citations back to their own blog
The meat of it is about PDF, Java -- surely those have a more widespread effect right? But they spend a lot less words on those topics. Note that all the visuals have to do with the stupid ssh-admin-password and bittorent'd malware.
Skip to the concluding paragraph -- they just have to emphasize the iphone again.
I was going to say "I declare this posting unfit for Slashdot" but the good I see is that we can pick it apart to sort out the fluff.
My rating system on severity overall on the entire population of apple products:
1) pdf/java (5 stars)
2) I-enabled-ssh-w/o-a-password (1 star - you're fault for being a retard)
3) Charles Miller iphone vuln (5 stars when it wasn't patched)
So you basically said what PC users do everyday (the ones that don't ever get viruses)...
If Apple didn't put such draconian limits on what a person could do with their own property, perhaps there wouldn't be the need to "jailbreak" it.
Apple either supplies a default root password or it has to build in a backdoor. Otherwise there is no way to upgrade the OS. Which way do you think is more secure?
The jail break issue isn't Apple's problem. It is a problem with people doing things they don't understand.
Looks like the jail break is just another way to root kit a computer (phone).
When people point out something the Iphone can't do, we hear "Oh it can, but you just have to jailbreak it". When we get stories about security holes, we hear "Oh that doesn't count, you just have to not jailbreak it".
So er, which is it?
The problem is that the Iphone is the only phone where "jailbreaking" is necessary to get basic functionality working (e.g., tethering, running applications that Apple don't like).
Consider, do you ever hear people talking about "jailbreaking" in the context of any other phone?
My 5800 works fine, not had a virus (indeed on any of my phones), never needed to hack it.
Except for those exploits that target Acrobat, or Flash, or .. or .. or.
Microsoft has made some improvements with DEP and IE8 on Win7, but there are still far too many vulnerabilities in commonly used and widely distributed applications to make me comfortable with Windows.