Slashdot Mirror
Obama Choosing NOT To Go To the Moon
bonch writes "Obama's budget proposal will contain no funding for the Constellation program, which was to send astronauts to the moon by 2020. Instead, NASA will be focused on terrestrial science, such as monitoring global warming. One anonymous official said: 'We certainly don't need to go back to the moon.'"
Because the Director of the Goddard SPACE flight center is the lightning rod character that in the 70's cried foul about the ozone layer depletion that was going to freeze the earth, then he reversed himself with no supporting data to cry foul about global warming in the late 90's and AlGore then saw his opportunity.
Now the Earth Observation Systems at Goddard get funded for whatever they want and they want to study earth more for the lemmings that follow along.
Yeah, and even harder after an almost trillion dollar military stimulus every year for the past 8 years. The economic stimulus package is a very small part of the enormous amount of spending necessitated by Republicans.
We are in debt exclusively because of Republicans and if Republicans were back in power they'd drive us further into debt. Someone has to be an adult, and as much as I disagree with much of what Obama is doing, it could be (and has been) so much worse.
They wouldn't need to be replaced because Europe and Japan are mostly uninterested in the continuing misadventures of imperialism.
They'd become interested in them pretty quickly when the Middle East destabilized into sectarian violence and their oil imports dried up......
I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
I see this keeps repeating, but this is utter bullshit. US military is needed just as much as a kick in the balls. Europe certainly doesn't need it. We have nukes (and we should get rid of them). The other day some commenter said that we needed the US military to defend us against Russia. Really? What's the US military going to do anyway should Russia decide to attack? Despite their Chicago school of economics-inflicted state of dereliction, they still have enough nukes in working order to pulverize the globe's surface 10 times over.
The only thing the US military does those days is war crimes. Lots of them.
Please explain what the "almost trillion dollar military stimulus" is. If you say "the Iraq and Afghanistan wars", we will know you have not done your research as the cost of the wars is less than $1 trillion total as of 2009.
There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
Yeah, they were so isolationist, they provided supplies and munitions to the brits during that time, as well as squeezing Japan on oil exports in order to provoke an attack.
Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
Great idea. Reducing CO2, which has a negligible impact on the non-problem of global warming, instead of developing space science. And what's even more ridiculous: Satellites have been monitoring the temperature of the troposphere for about two decades showing that there has been no warming since the last 14 years. And the guy who's heading the program recently gave a lecture with the title: Nature, not human activity, rules the climate. I think Obama is just annoyed that he didn't get his way in Carbonhagen.
And now please mod me down and bomb me with rebuttals because I am a climate denier.
According to your posts around this thread, our current foreign policy is to use military force to keep the brown people pacified so that we can safely make money exploiting their resources.
Now, stop me if I'm wrong, but... well... that's colonialism. That's EXACTLY what the European maritime empires were all about.
Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
Tell that to the teabaggers.
There are no terrestrial "climate change" problems. New peer reviewed studies have mostly debunked most of the claims from the global warming crowd. Global warming/climate change has only been proven in computer models that lacks the necessary feedback's since we dont fully understand the climate yet.
The "warm" period we are experiencing now is simply a natural cycle caused by a combination of solar activity, oceanic cycles, cosmic rays and more. Rest of the warming is due to the recovery from the little ice age. The planet has been warmer many times throughout this interglacial period and this current warm period is actually one of the cooler ones.
PR, nothing more. How do *you* explain why there was no US response to the catastrophe that was Haiti for the last 50 years ... it's not like they suddenly became the poorest western nation overnight, and it's not the first time they've had floods, hurricanes or earthquakes. The entire country is one big fuckup, and the US did nothing.
Bullshit. The US has poured money into that hellhole for years. In the 90s we deposed the military Government that seized power in an illegal coup.
sound familiar ? 1940s, a rather large war that you also arrived late to and then tried to claim all the glory ?
Our arrival wouldn't have been necessary if the French and Brits had any semblance of national honor and had opposed Hitler in the early 30s when he had no military might to back up his sabre rattling. Heck, the French alone could have nipped the whole problem in the bud in 1936 when Hitler reoccupied the Rhineland.
Sorry, you don't get to blame us for your failures there either. Four hundred thousand Americans died because you couldn't control the rabid dog in your own backyard.
I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
We're not in debt "exclusively because of Republicans." You're one of those guys who magically forgets that Democrats took control of Congress two years prior to the recession and that they encouraged banks to make loans to poor people who couldn't pay it back, in the name of "social justice."