Slashdot Mirror


Apple's "iPad" Out In the Open

Reader oxide7 is one of the many to note that the heaviest speculation is mostly over (still waiting on the price, though) about Apple's anticipated new device (though there are surely plenty of questions about the device's hardware capabilities and the scope of its software and content marketplace): "At an event in San Francisco Apple released its anticipated iPad.'[It's] Way better than a laptop, way better then a phone. You can turn it any way you want. To see the whole page is phenomenal,' said Jobs." The (0.5") skinny: 1.5 lbs, multitouch, up to 64GB of flash, 9.7" screen, and a 1Ghz "Apple A4" chip (more about the A4 in Engadget's developing story). The iPad is closer in concept to an expanded iPhone (OS and all) than a miniaturized laptop, though it doesn't have quite as much connectivity as you might expect, with no 3G connection built in. (You'll have to make do with 802.11n, Bluetooth, and tethering.) Live coverage is ongoing at gdgt live, Engadget, and Gizmodo, as well as various others. Update by timothy, 19:58 GMT: Got the 3G part wrong; 3G is indeed an option. Prices run from $499 (16GB flash, WiFi but no 3G) to $829 (WiFi and 3G, 64GB flash). Should start shipping in 60 days (WiFi only), in 90 days for 3G. Surprsingly, no built-in camera.

21 of 1,713 comments (clear)

  1. No flash support by vivek7006 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which means no hulu.com, espn360.com or fancast.com. Somehow Mr. Jobs is touting this as a feature.

    1. Re:No flash support by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you can free TV shows and movies streaming over Flash, why buy them on iTunes?

      I don't expect Flash on this or the iPhone anytime soon.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:No flash support by onefriedrice · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Will Adobe even be invited on board to write a plugin?

      Hopefully not. I don't know of any products with worse security records than Acrobat Reader and Flash. It's time for Flash to just go away. Fortunately, unlike FF, Safari does support h.264 which will surely be supported by hulu et al. eventually.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    3. Re:No flash support by A12m0v · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Flash is proprietary I'd like to see it fade into oblivion. Maybe the iPhone and iPad will be what it takes to get people considering HTML5 instead of Flash.
      YouTube now has an HTML5 beta, and some other streaming sites as well.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  2. What is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't this just a big expensive iPod touch now?

    1. Re:What is the point? by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's more than just an iPod touch that won't fit in your pocket...it's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard. It's the worst of both worlds!

    2. Re:What is the point? by zstlaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's more than just an iPod touch that won't fit in your pocket...it's also an underpowered netbook with no keyboard. It's the worst of both worlds!

      No no no! It has a faster processor than the iTouch, better resolution that iPhone, and some nifty new features to make up for the lack of keyboard... Iit is more like a Nexus One that won't fit in your pocket!

    3. Re:What is the point? by doconnor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are lots of things that a iPod Touch with a larger screen would be useful for, like web browsing, book reading and movie watching.

    4. Re:What is the point? by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hmmm. The thing about the iPod is that the killer features is the integration of iPod/iTunes/iTunes store. The devices are nice of course, but each part of this triangle has significant limitations.

      The key is that they all work together to support use cases that consumers find convenient and valuable. That's why "iPod Killers" never kill. You have to get all three pieces, and that is hard especially the store end of things.

      Now Amazon nailed it with the Kindle. The Kindle is not the best eBook reader, but Amazon + WhisperNet + Kindle work together better than anything anybody had ever seen before. You can make a better eBook reader, but what you really have to do is to make sure that whole source to use chain has no serious mistakes in it (like not having enough books to sell, having lousy battery life, or having DRM so restrictive it interferes with the primary use of the devices).

      So you can't look at this device and say "meh", because it has never been the best device that wins. It's the affordable looking system that offers a convenient solution for something consumers value that wins.

      You're going to have to see the whole thing in action to know whether this is "meh" or not. I suspect it may be, but I'm not shorting Apple stock yet.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:What is the point? by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I understand. I happen to hate the iTunes store. I much prefer Amazon's MP3 download service. It meets my needs. I don't much care for the way iTunes wants to steer me to the latest episode of popular TV shows. I have no interest in that, and I always feel like I'm fighting the software to get it to do what I want.

      But one thing I've learned after decades in this business is that you can't design products around your own preferences. I've seen that approach fail time and time again. I've even seen the same guys make the same mistake more than once.

      It doesn't matter that I hate the iTunes store. Steve Jobs would be an idiot to design products that cater to people like me, because we're lousy, cranky, critical customers and cheapskates besides.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  3. Multi-tasking by konadelux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So help me god this thing better have multitasking

  4. Re:Doesn't Create a Need by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This entire presentation seems a little disappointing. Really, it looks, acts, and feels like a giant iPod Touch. Whereas the iPhone and iPod really created a need , I don't see that this substantially innovate to make it a must-have. It doesn't seem to improve on anything so substantially that it is an obvious choice. Maybe I need to see a few more videos, but I don't see this pulling serious market share away from Kindle's targeted market segment.

    Yes, quite.

    Last time I saw a /. commenter speculating about the future of Apple's latest new thing, it read something like this:

    Raise your hand if you have iTunes ...

    Raise your hand if you have a FireWire port ...

    Raise your hand if you have both ...

    Raise your hand if you have $400 to spend on a cute Apple device ...

    There is Apple's market. Pretty slim, eh? I don't see many sales in the future of iPod.

    ~LoudMusic

    I prefer to take the 'wait and see' approach.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  5. Re:No WCMDA/HSPA or even CDMA/EVDO is a huge miss by arcite · · Score: 5, Insightful
    wifi is in Starbucks, Mcdonolds, bars & cafes, and all other cool places where people will hang out with these things.

    Universities and colleges all have strong wifi coverage

    wait for Rev. B!

    Apple will sell millions.

  6. is late by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What was wrong with the oft-rumored "iSlate" moniker?

    "Ip ad" doesn't mean anything in English. "Is late" meant Duke Nukem Forever for several years.

  7. Re:Hmm by DragonWriter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My biggest problem with this is that it seems to be locked into the app store, just like the iPhone. In that sense, it does LESS than a netbook. Not saying this won't be successful, since Apple is nothing if not great at marketing consumer electronics, but what does this do for me task-wise that I can't do on a netbook?

    Its a convergence device. As such, its designed to be a better netbook than the Kindle DX, a better eReader than an EeePC, and a better portable media player than either.

    Its not a better netbook than a dedicated netbook, or a better eReader than a dedicated reader (though, of course, Apple will try to sell it as being better in both these roles than the existing competition.) And maybe not a better portable media player for most uses than an iPod Touch. But Apple's bet is that the perceived price/utility it will provide is better than any of dedicated readers/netbooks because it does a good enough job in all three roles to be a one-stop multirole device.

  8. True by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is exactly what happened when the iPod was announced: slashdot dismissed it as derivative while Apple quietly reinvented the freakin' walkman. One thing Apple generally gets right is marketing. There may be nothing technologically revolutionary to most slashdotters in the iPad but the fact is it's already shaken up the consumer world even before it was officially acknowledged as an existing product. At the Consumer electronics show in Las Vegas this year the upcoming Apple tablet was a bigger topic of excitement than any device that actually existed at the time -- Apple didn't even go to the convention and yet they managed to have a significant presence there. They have been very successful in the hype department without even spending a dime on advertising. Technological merits aside they will sell a boatload of these.

  9. The iPad is a Platform by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most people here don't see past their own noses... Myself, I like the iPad except for the fact that Apple decides what I can install... but that's the whole point.

    The iPad is a platform, not a device.

    Most people just want stuff to work, and don't want to care how. Most of the time, so do I. I don't want my stove in the kitchen to require a friggin manual to do basic cooking even if I could patch it to boil eggs 15% faster I never would be bothered. It's the same for regular people with all tech, computers included. People don't want to know the details, they just want to tap on a movie/book/app/whatever, confirm their transaction, and have it all just work.

    The iPad can run iPhone apps, and the SDK is available now. App developers will be falling over each other to be first with new apps taking advantage of the larger screen.

    I'm very tempted, but still skeptical I'll buy this myself. The closed platform is an issue for me. But most people couldn't care less about what they can't do on a device like this, if they just can do all they want. Freedom is great, but how many of us have truly bothered to go under the hood in our games consoles for instance? I can do all I truly need with our Wii even if I can't run SCUMMVM. Hell, I don't even have time to play all the games I've bought.

    The iPad will be a great example of good enough technology. "The internet", in your lap, on this amazing looking little device. With movies, books, music and apps to boot. Joe and Jane Average are gonna think it's great.

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  10. Re:Extra things you'll need by aslate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exactly my thoughts, they've done the Tablet PC without including the pen, the reason that Tablet PCs are so useful.

    Our Uni publishes all the notes online as PDFs, i load up aforementioned app and annotate right on the notes. But i can also insert extra pages, copy-paste and insert diagrams. My logic coursework and having the ability to copy/paste/edit previous lines, as well as doodle without wrecking it is so much more useful than a pad of paper. The brilliance of a Tablet PC is the pen, not the fact you can poke it.

    My 3.5 year old Tablet PC has a 1.7Ghz Pentium M with 1GB RAM and is now running Windows 7. It blows the functionality of this thing out the water.

  11. Re:Extra things you'll need by daveime · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What gets me is the price step up for the memory ...

    To get +16 GB the price increase is $100
    To get +32 GB the price increase is another $200

    So basically, we are talking $100 per 16GB of flash memory, when I could buy a 16GB USB dongle for any other device for $10 ???

    And the $130 extra for 3G ? A lot of mobiles don't cost that, and have a hell of a lot more than 3G built in.

    As usual, another iRipoff, and the fanbois will lap it up ... fucking mugs.

    I have karma to burn, so do your worst, it won't change reality, only the visibility of this comment ...

  12. Re:Typical techies and gadget freaks by patSPLAT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually you don't get it, the software is what makes this device nothing more than a giant iPhone. Which is absurd.

  13. Apple A4 by No.+24601 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, I'm a bit disappointed :) Yes, with the iPad a bit, but more so with the idea that this is Slashdot and barely anyone has thrown a spotlight on the Apple A4. This is an ARM, high performance, low power CPU with integrated graphics, and more importantly the first piece of processing silicon coming out of Cupertino. Regardless of how much i like the Intel Atom, i think this will be a viable competitor on the ARM front. Too bad it is under lock and key with the iPhone OS :p