Slashdot Mirror


MSI Will Launch iPad Alternative

itwbennett writes "Underwhelmed by the iPad? Don't give up on tablets just yet, says blogger Peter Smith. MSI has a tablet coming in the second half of 2010 that measures up on price and size and addresses a lot of the iPad's most noted shortcomings. 'The iPad runs iPhone OS while the MSI runs Android,' writes Smith. 'That means the MSI will multitask of course, and Flash support in Android should be a given by launch time (though that isn't certain). It has a camera. It's running on an Nvidia Tegra2 chip which Ars Technica suggests puts it on par with the iPad's A4 as far as computing horsepower. And of course Android doesn't live in a walled garden.'" The post notes that the MSI device does not support multitouch in its built-in apps. Still, would an Android-powered iPad-alike tempt you?

Update: 01/29 17:58 GMT by KD : Dave Altavilla suggests Hot Hardware's coverage of Asus's recently announced tablet, also based on the Tegra2 chip.

20 of 756 comments (clear)

  1. Geeks miss the point again. by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not about "do more things," it's about "do very few things better."

    That's why Apple wins.

    My wife asked about the iPad last night (she owns a netbook right now) and now she's drooling over one. Why? It doesn't have "files." It doesn't have "windows." She won't have to worry about "flash drives." And so on. She was so excited about all the things it didn't have (and that she therefore didn't have to worry about) that she was disappointed when I told her they weren't in the Apple Store in Manhattan yet.

    Meanwhile, the geeks are running around blasting Apple products for all the things they "don't have" and recommending complex alternatives.

    That's why Apple is making $$$ these days. Because they're removing 60 percent of the features and making the remaining 40 percent configuration free and so polished they make your eyes hurt.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Geeks miss the point again. by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd mod you up if I could.

      I have an MSI Wind (a hackintosh) that I love but it is not the same thing as a tablet. Too many people view a tablet as "a computer that is just the screen." Apple has gambled (and I am increasingly thinking they're right on target) that a tablet is not a computer - it's a computing device. If you want a computer, you'll use a laptop or desktop. Those already exist and there are hundreds of choices available. A tablet, however, is an ultra-mobile device capable of very specific computing tasks.

      In short, I agree - it's about doing few things better. That's why I think the iPad (hate that name) is going to do pretty well as it differentiates itself from the deluge of "computer in tablet form" offerings from other companies. It's not a computer in tablet form - it's a tablet.

    2. Re:Geeks miss the point again. by eepok · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I agree with your analysis as to why the Apple iDevices sell so well, I have to state that "the geeks" aren't interested simply in buying from the company that has the best business model... we just want something that works the way we want. We couldn't care less if our purchase includes us in part of a smug team of iTards or anti-Mac... we just want to know if this tablet has the features we require. Example:

      I don't need a camera.
      I need multi-tasking.
      I prefer to have a modable interface to save CPU/Battery power (less is more)
      I want an SD or USB port
      I need 3G
      I need a text and email program.
      I need it to be less than $600.
      I don't care what anyone else wants nor how successful the company will be (or if it "wins" in the tablet arena)
      etc...

    3. Re:Geeks miss the point again. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Meanwhile, the geeks are running around blasting Apple products for all the things they "don't have" and recommending complex alternatives.

      Wait, so multitasking is a "complex alternative"? Please.

      Yes, Apple's tablet is meant to be a computing appliance. But ffs, no fucking user-level multitasking? Christ, people bitched and complained about PalmOS and it's lack of multitasking, and now you're cheering it on like it's some kind of feature. It's fucking baffling.

      That and the fact that the iPad is a completely closed off system puts it off my list. No, I don't believe a tablet must be a general purpose computer. But I do believe that I should at least be able to install what I want on it from whatever source I like, and I should be able to run more than one fucking application at the same damn time.

    4. Re:Geeks miss the point again. by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mobility. While a laptop is mobile, a tablet is dramatically more so. Can you walk and use your laptop? Nope. You can with a tablet. Imagine an administrative assistant for some executive with one. Do you now start to see the sort of market this type of computing device can target? If you want a computer, buy a computer. This is not a computer - it's a mobile computing device.

    5. Re:Geeks miss the point again. by GooberToo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure wish the trolls would go back under their bridge. The fact that so many Apple trolls are working so hard pretty means they admit Android is superior; else why work so hard to FUD it? Exactly.

      For example, app developers on Android can publish without approval, but so can malware developers.

      This is true for Apple too. The difference is its easier and costs less to develop for Android. Android is open. Apple is closed. Apple's vetting service is not necessarily in place to prevent trojans. Its in place to protect their property; which is the iPhone its running on. Its hardly unreasonable to believe a trojan can make it past Apple. The only difference is, you'd have to be more ballsy to try.

      Basically your position boils down to freedom is bad. People can come up to you and kill you right now so your argument is that no one should have that freedom. Sure its illegal, but they have the freedom to do so. They can freely obtain weapons. They can freely travel to your location. No free society is completely safe. To be clear, this is not a threat - just making a point. The point being, a free society has an inherent risk and certain responsibilities are therefore assumed.

      Not to mention, Android limits the amount of disk space for installable apps to something less than 256MB. You can forget about apps that require a large local database, or other large apps like games.

      Not true. Even pragmatically its not true. The limits can be changed. But, your comment is completely ignoring the fact that applications are encouraged to use external storage for content. Only absolute dolts would consider 16GB-32GB (and growing) to be a serious limit for a hand held device. Realistically, you're not likely to find an Android application which uses more than a couple dozen MB of internal storage, whereby the rest is deferred to external storage. Just because Android is different and purposely encourages a superior solution doesn't make it bad.

      Contrary to your assertions, different is not bad. Freedom is not bad. With freedom comes personal responsibility. It seems in addition to hating freedom, you personally refuse to accept any type of responsibility. In a free society you have that right - but it still makes you useless to society.

  2. Re:"Walled garden"? by slim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you don't know the meaning of a common semi-technical phrase, it's probably better to just look it up, than to loudly proclaim what you don't know.

  3. I've had a long-running problem by aussersterne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    with my wife hating multitasking. She never closes a thing (tab, application, etc.) and invariably runs out of memory. Often, there are dozens of background processes. Her hard drive starts to thrash. Things grind to a halt. I get called.

    I've tried to explain about things taking up memory, the problem of lots of background applications, the problem of never closing applications. She doesn't want to know what memory even IS. "Why is the computer so stupid," she wants to know, "that it can't figure out that I only care about what I'm working on RIGHT NOW?"

    Say what you want, but a) she's my wife, b) she's rather beautiful, c) it's absolutely impossible to even try to say "okay, let me explain to you why..." and d) Apple's gonna continue to make bank selling devices to people just like her.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:I've had a long-running problem by torkus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny you should mention that...OSX is actually worse at leaving things running unintentionally :)

      However with the iPad when she wants to go check that website while she's writing something...oh...wait, your document closed? Your browser isn't on the page you spent 15 minutes drilling down to?

      No offense to you or your wife, but if she wants to use a computer she needs to learn how. If she refuses, she perpetuates her frustration when things don't work as she things they should. If she really never *ever* refers back to old windows then tell her to hit the X instead of the _

      I think the iPad will be more useful as an output device...a la ST:TNG pads. But it's limited usefulness in other regards makes it a very expensive toy that's too big to carry everywhere. Instead of being a 'just right' middle ground i think it's a 'just wrong' small and large product. Heck, even my 1st gen Sony e-reader has a headphones jack.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  4. Re:On Par? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "most likely has", "is most likely several times that", "power consumption is also claimed to be several times lower than"

    Oh! the facts!

    Fact is: no official info has been given about the internals of the A4, only rumors. And yet you come to the conclussion that the Tegra 2 is faster both GPU and CPU wise, and yet
    consumes less power. And you criticize sites of being affected by a RTD -did you mean RDF-? maybe you are also in some kind of RDF yourself, of another kind.

    When a Tegra 2 tablet is released you will be able to compare the systems. Until them saying one is better than the other is just speculation. Well, in fact it is quite easy to compare
    them right now: they have the same performance and the same power consumption: 0, as you can not get either one.

  5. Re:Only if it has an IPS panel. by Albanach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't use Facebook, Twitter, or any of the other ultra-stupid Web 2.0 time wasters. And these days, the further away I am from my email, the better off I am.

    Yet here you are on /.

  6. Re:Touch is just nice by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A better touchscreen interface is the difference between an app
    being something that you are vaguely aware of but never use vs.
    something that you use constantly. Your basic input devices are
    by no means trivial.

    If Apple maintains this edge, it will be hard for competitors that
    are more functional in other areas to get any anywhere.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  7. Re:Touch is just nice by elzurawka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, cause when i am on a packed train, all i want to do it talk my private message into my phone :)

    Voice recognition is over hyped, and it will not work as a sole means for data entry, ever.

    --
    -EL
  8. Missing the point again. by aussersterne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure, it's "her own fucking problem" and it looks like iPad is how she's going to solve it, judging by her excitement at watching the YouTube videos and my answers to her questions about it last night. I'm sure you don't care.

    Maybe you think she's an idiot. Maybe I'm really bad at explaining. Both of those things have little to do with my suggestion that geeks will likely continue to wonder until the end of time why not everyone wants a bare/caseless single board computer that fits inside a coffee cup, runs embedded Linux, and is hackable for umpteen million projects.

    I'm just ruminating on all the Slashdot anti-Apple posting and the apparent geek frustration at the success of Apple.

    A: "Apple sucks!"
    B: "Regular people like Apple!"
    A: "But Apple isn't a hackable Linux embedded device with hooks for 23 language APIs!"
    B: "Regular people don't want that!"
    A: "Then regular people are really stupid and deserve to be dominated and reamed!"
    B: "?!!?"
    A: "By the way, why don't people like us, and why can't I get a girlfriend?"

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  9. Re:Not really by molarmass192 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ignoring the fact that a netbook isn't a tablet, there's still a great deal of difference between the two beyond the similar price point:

    Acer:
    $420
    3 lbs
    6 hour battery life
    8 in x 11.2 in x 1.18 in
    No touchscreen
    Plastic case with lower coefficient of friction

    iPad:
    $499
    1.6 lbs
    10 hour battery life
    7.5 x 9.5 in x 0.5 in
    Touchscreen
    Aluminum case with higher coefficient of friction

    The fact that the iPad is half the weight, half the thickness, and has almost 2x the battery life is not something you can easily ignore in a device who's primary goal is to be portable. To setup a litmus test, try to argue that using a netbook to reply to an email while walking through an airport is less awkward than using a touchscreen tablet in the same situation.

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  10. So its for people too stupid to use a computer? by Shivetya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course I would not expect you tell your wife that.

    Really, your wife is really really ignorant or just really good at selling you on her buying a new toy.

    I know lots of people who are bad with computers, I certainly do my best to make sure they don't touch one

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  11. Re:Not really by rindeee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was waiting with baited breath to see what Apple was going to deliver. What a letdown. I typically love what Apple puts out there. I was fully expecting something I could load up with whatever open source software I wanted. Something I could do video iChat on. Etc. After the big release thing I ordered an ASUS Eee PC T91MT. 9" multi-touch screen (yeah, Windows 7, but hey...), 3-5hr. battery life, load whatever software I want, built-in web cam for VTC, not one, but TWO SDHC slots, blah blah blah. Oh, and a real keyboard. I dunno...for my money, the ASUS seems like a much better buy.

  12. Re:Not really by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "I've yet to see an app that makes me think, "Oh- I have to have that, it is so much better than using a mouse/keyboard/trackpad/etc."

    Microsoft One-Note. It's the killer tablet app.

    Than and a program to let you pen markup PDF files. I have switched to only carrying a tablet into meetings because of those two apps. Plus I added a nice little microphone http://www.sourcingmap.com/mini-small-mic-microphone-for-laptop-line-chat-p-29294.html to the mic in plug and record the meeting audio as I sit there.

    You cant look at a tablet as a pc or a laptop replacement. it's a limited use tool, leverage it's advantages and you really see what it's good at.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  13. But Apple has solved that problem. by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every iPhone app I have (yes, that's the iPhone famous for "not multitasking") stores complete state information when it exits.

    Safari comes back with all the same tabs and windows open. It doesn't have to reload them. It is scrolled to exactly the same place I was at. Partially filled out forms are still partially filled out.

    The document I was working on in DocsToGo is exactly the way it looked (with the cursor in exactly the same place).

    It's COMPLETELY state-stable and FAST, there's no "saving state" when you switch applications, because they store their state continuously as it evolves.

    I am a power Linux user. I HAVE a home-built hardware RAID sitting here on my desktop, along with a triple-head display.

    I run from the updates-testing repos on Fedora. I have patched my own radeon_drv.so Xorg module to fix the infamous compositing corruption bug (for those who care, when doing copy-from-screen, first do a test to see if the bitmap being copied is smaller than 32 pixels; if it is, don't copy-from, because the bitmap hasn't made it into the buffer yet to be copied back from).

    I'm the sort you'd think would be bugged as hell with "no multitasking."

    Only I'm totally not. As far as I'm concerned, for an interface on a tiny screen (where you're unlikely to have multiple windows onscreen at once), perfect stateful information is damn close to multitasking.

    The only thing that can't be approximated is background processes (i.e. start it and let it compute while I work on something else), but it's not like I'm going to do a 20-day render on my iPhone, is it? Nor on my iPad.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  14. Re:Not really by Kozz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Y'know, I love my netbook, but there are some times that it really just doesn't do it for me. Like in a yaris, at night, while someone else is driving down a gravel road. The position you're in is uncomfortable. The keyboard is awkward. The trackpad is tiny and useless when you're bouncing around.

    That seems like a pretty high bar. Tiny uncomfortable vehicle, at night, on a bumpy gravel road? It could be that this is one of those times that a person puts the computing devices away. Under those conditions, it may also be difficult to even read a paperback.

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.