Slashdot Mirror


Phone and Text Bans On Drivers Shown Ineffective

shmG writes to share news of a recent study on the impact of laws which ban the use of cell phones while driving. There appears to be no reduction in accidents as a result of these laws. "The HLDI compared collisions of 100 insured vehicles per year in New York, Washington DC, Connecticut, and California — all states with currently enacted roadway text bans. Despite those laws, monthly fluctuations in crash rates didn't change after bans were enacted, [although] there were less people using devices while driving. An earlier study conducted by the HLDI reported that cellphone use was directly linked to four-fold increases in crash injuries. Also independent studies done by universities have shown correlation between driving while using a phone and crashes."

7 of 406 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Compliance Rates & Hands-Free Use by ak_hepcat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Meh.

    Different people can handle different levels of distraction. This is proven.

    So, there should be tests. Depending on your score, you get to have (or not have) certain things in your vehicle,
    like radios, heaters, people, pets, phones, etc.

    Really, some folks should not be on the road, even if all they're doing is 10-and-2, eyes sweeping.

    --
    Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
  2. Re:Not too surprising by cstdenis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The kind of people who crash due to texting and driving, and the same kind of people who will keep texting and driving regardless of the law.

    --
    1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
  3. Woman can't stop texting, wrecks 3 cars in 3 years by TimHunter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a story from my local newspaper about a 20-something woman who's totaled 3 cars in the past 3 years because she was texting while driving. Apparently she learned this from her dad, who is unable to spend 2 hours just driving and must spend the time on the phone and doing his email.

    Why isn't she in jail? Why aren't we treating driving-while-texting the same way we treat driving while intoxicated? Do we have to wait until she (or her dad) kills somebody? http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local_state/story/301086.html

  4. Re:Compliance Rates & Hands-Free Use by ascari · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Couple of things come to mind:

    1. Ability to handle distraction is not a constant like, say your eye color. It varies with the circumstances. One day you might handle lots of distraction at the level of a fighter pilot, but the next day have the flu or you're hung over and probably shouldn't be on the road even if you're doing it 10-and-2, eyes sweeping.

    2. Whatever happened to equality in the eyes of the law, justice is blind and other such misguided populist notions?

    3. I remember reading about a study where people rated themselves in terms of their driving skills. Nobody said "I'm a below average driver", even that the statistical probability of that being the case is very low. (Read: I bet you really, really suck at driving, dude. :-)

  5. Re:Compliance Rates & Hands-Free Use by RobVB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    California's ban has been in place for a year and a half now, and I still regularly see people driving while talking on their phones. So hand-held phone use has reduced in these areas. How much?

    Perhaps more importantly, what kind of drivers have stopped using their phones while driving? I'd assume a lot of generally responsible drivers (who may not have known about or believed in the dangers) stopped using their phones, while those "inconsiderate" drivers who don't care about other people still race across pedestrian crossings, not even aware of the "bonus points" they're raking in because they're too busy talking to whoever it is that's so important about whatever it is that just can't wait.

    --
    I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
  6. There are benefits by tthomas48 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are some benefits. If a driver slams into me talking on a cellphone and there's a ban in my area, it's going to immediately move to a ticketable offense and therefore their insurance is going to pay to fix my car.

    Whereas if they're talking on a cellphone and there's no law banning it then I have to prove they couldn't drive before I get my insurance money.

  7. Re:Compliance Rates & Hands-Free Use by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Agreed. For example, I used to drive drunk all the time and I never had an accident or hurt anyone. So for 20 years of my life, I've never had an accident after drinking. Therefore, I think that I've proven that I can drink and drive and the government should give me a special waiver.

    I also have this special amulet that keeps tigers from eating me. I've had it all my life and I've never been eaten by a tiger...