Slashdot Mirror
UK Gov't Says "No Evidence" IE Is Less Secure
aliebrah writes "Lord Avebury tabled a parliamentary question in the UK regarding the security of Internet Explorer and whether the UK government would reconsider its use. He got an answer from the UK Home Office that's unlikely to please most Slashdot readers. The UK government contends that 'there is no evidence that moving from the latest fully patched versions of Internet Explorer to other browsers will make users more secure.'"
That's very likely true, as the stupidity of the user remains the weakest factor in security.
And this is a constant in the UK Government?
http://michaelsmith.id.au
It really doesn't matter what browser they use, they will still copy unencrypted data onto CDs and then put them in the post, send unencrypted emails to each other, leave laptops and memory sticks on the train or if that fails, stand in front of photographers with confidential information showing. The 'Chinese' (or whoever) really don't need to bother with browser attacks.
They just need grow suspicious of IE harboring WMDs. Then the lack of evidence wouldn't be a problem at all.
Are these the same people who said IRAQ was full of WMDs and terrorists?
No sig today...
I loled at this fake, then I type "windows for warships" in google... We are living in a strange world.
Until we run out of shelves, then we table them until the table is cluttered, and then we floor them.
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
Evidence was gathered on a Tuesday.
Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
I lollled when I thought of Microsoft's having started offshoring back in 2004; the thought of Indian programmers writing code for their old colonial master's warships is...amusing.
Funnier than American programmers writing code for their old colonial master's warships?