Slashdot Mirror


Will Your Super Bowl Party Anger the Copyright Gods?

garg0yle writes "According to some folks, watching the Super Bowl on a television bigger than 55 inches is illegal. Is this true? Yes and no — long story short, if you're in a private residence you're probably okay, but if you're running a sports bar you may technically have to negotiate a license with the NFL. Just don't charge for food, or call it a 'Super Bowl' party, since the term itself is copyright."

3 of 560 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Ok NFL, I can take a hint by bsDaemon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Frankly, I wouldn't watch even if the broadcast the game under Creative Commons. I have no interest in American Football at all. Frankly, I'd be surprised if more than 40-50% of Slashdotters were planning on watching. Of course, I don't think most people actually watch it -- they just have it in the background as an excuse to drink beer and eat nachos... (as if people really need an excuse for that).

  2. Re:Your Honor... by Moryath · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Word to the wise: stop drinking the kool-aid. Obama calling someone a liar is like Castro yelling at Mao for human rights violations.

  3. Re:Old news by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    HDMI cables are just wires. Well, they're groups of wires in one jacket or bundle, that's the definition of a cable. There's no active circuitry in an HDMI cable. I call bullshit.

    Note that I do not consider a converter cable to be a cable; it's a converter with integrated cable. And this is the only logical way to view it. If you have such a beast, and it spits out DVI without HDCP, then your TV won't need HDCP either. HDCP doesn't require any additional connections over HDMI without HDCP.

    Or in simpler terms, citation please?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"