Slashdot Mirror


"No Scan, No Fly" At Heathrow and Manchester

An anonymous reader writes "It is now compulsory for people selected for a full body scan to take part, or they will not be allowed to fly from Heathrow or Manchester airports. There is no optional pat down. Also, a rule which meant that people under 18 were not allowed to participate in the body scanner trial has been overturned by the government. There is no mention of blurring out the genitals, however reports a few years back said X-ray backscatter devices aren't effective unless the genitals of people going through them are visible."

2 of 821 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Thats it by robably · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, the government has won - it just so happens they have the same aims as the terrorists so they've co-opted them as a useful smokescreen.

    They're saying they have introduced this measure as a response to the Christmas underpants bomber, the truth is they were waiting for anything, any kind of attack no matter how small as an excuse to introduce these scanners. They already trialled them, they were always going to be introduced, Brown was just waiting for an excuse.

    It's a similar tactic to having a public consultation to give the appearance of fairness, when they have already decided what they're going to do anyway. Yes I'm angry.

  2. Re:Another reason not to fly via Heathrow by Mike_EE_U_of_I · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the last two years over 80,000 people died on US highways, but there wasn't even one death from flying in a commercial airliner.

    You're more likely to die from falling down your basement stairs, and far more likely to die at the hands of your own family than a terrorist.

    You linked to an old article. In the last two years, we had this crash http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colgan_Air_Flight_3407

        However, I believe that crash actually helps make your point. Let's expand the time line from your article to the present. We now have about 130,000 people dead in the USA from car crashes and 50 from airline crashes. There were some smaller crashes (the global list of all crashes is here http://www.planecrashinfo.com/ but it doesn't change the point. The ratio is truly stunning.