Slashdot Mirror


A Look Into the Chinese Hacker Underworld

beachels416 writes "The NY Times gained access to a Chinese hacker-for-profit, referred to as 'Majia,' and observed him during one of his nightly 'sessions.' From the article: 'Oddly, Majia said his parents did not know that he was hacking at night [hacking is illegal in China]. But at one point, he explained the intricacies of computer hacking and stealing data while his mother stood nearby, listening silently, while offering a guest oranges and candy.' At another point Majia spoke about the recent Google attacks, and claimed to have particular knowledge of the exact vector used. Nothing too new, but an interesting read nevertheless."

18 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. Lots of content by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To sum up the article for those too lazy to read it

    A chinese guy works a day job, works as a hacker at night. Likes to stay anonymous and take money from people's bank accounts.

    I guess the fact that this is a chinese guy is shocking to some new york times readers?

    1. Re:Lots of content by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, even your negative synopsis of the piece flies in the face of conventional wisdom, which is that attacks of Chinese origin are all a carefully orchestrated by the ruthless and scheming Chinese government.

      Security researchers have identified the attacks against Google to be largely from the Chinese government, as were the politically motivated attacks against the Dala Lama and other Tibetan exiles. There is almost no doubt that the majority of the hacking that goes on in China (and elsewhere) is of the sort that TFA reports on, but linking it to the recent attacks on Google and other US government contractors is disingenuous.

    2. Re:Lots of content by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or this piece is a Chinese govenmet sanctioned bit of propaganda. They WANT you to think that it's some individual...

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
  2. Perspective check by abbynormal+brain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article highlights two important facts
    1. Fun
    2. Profitable

    It's been a long time since I broke into my grade school's soda/chips/candy closet from a skylight on the roof. Sitting there drinking soda and enjoying chips, I can clearly remember how exciting (breaking in) and rewarding (chips/soda) it was. Later, I learned to respect other people's property.

    So what now?
    If you park a trailer in an accessible area ... expect the back doors to be open and the cargo gone. It's very exciting - it's very rewarding. Is it wrong - sure. Are the thieves the ones to blame - no. Not exactly. The thieves are not the ones to blame - the thieves are to be expected. It's an ongoing game where we square off with human nature - make it furn for the security side - keep building better mouse traps. Don't like this perspective? Ok - change human nature then. Good luck.

    --
    L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
    1. Re:Perspective check by ArbitraryDescriptor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You desire something X much. Your perception of the consequences finds them to be of Y severity.
      if(X>Y){
      stealing = rational
      } else {
      stealing = irrational
      }

      You may be wrong about Y, but given the set of information you behaved rationally. In other words: If you feel you would benefit a net life-improvement by taking the object, it seems rational to do so. Doesn't mean it's ethical, but the debate of moral absolutes and human nature is another subject entirely.

    2. Re:Perspective check by brian0918 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may be wrong about Y, but given the set of information you behaved rationally.

      Reason doesn't occur in a vacuum, just as your actions don't occur in a vacuum. The rational choice is that which is objectively determined to be in the interest of your life. Thus, theft is always irrational, as it is never in the interest of your life to steal - you violate the rights of others, you make yourself dependent on the failures of others, you cannot pretend to know enough to properly assess the situation (Y), and you encourage others to violate your rights in the process.

    3. Re:Perspective check by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's no more settled than whether some guy 2000 years ago really died for our sins.

      Nah, that's quite well settled. If he existed, he died for pissing off the Roman authorities. Bitch-slapping the money changers and uniting the poor interferes with tax revenues.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. cracking is illegal in any civilized country by tokul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    cracking is illegal in any civilized country. I am pretty sure that if he spends nights hacking, Chinese authorities won't put him in jail unless he tries to hack something in order to circumvent their controls.

  4. Wait, the NYT didn't get hold of this guy on... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...IRC? Isn't that how hackers talk when they don't want to be overheard?

    I guess the NYT needs to attach a disclaimer to the story, because whenever a journalist tries to interview a "hacker" I can't decide to laugh or cry. Something like this would do nicely:

    The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  5. Wrong word? by humphrm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't see anything in the article about hacking. It all looked like cracking to me.

    --
    -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
  6. Anyone here thinks it's actually a good thing? by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess plenty of Slashdotters learned a bit about computing from minor cracks - almost everyone has changed a save game file with a text or hex editor. Insecure network shares at your school network. Getting your neighbors' insecure Wifi passwords, someone probably thinks MAC filtering alone is safe. Modifying Flash games to give yourself 2^31 - 1 points on the high score board. Getting root on random poorly secured UNIX terminals in tech expos. Getting into someone else's IIS and read his local files via the canonical path bug many years ago. etc.

    Sure it's not healthy if all you do are these minor thing and you keep doing these stuff for years. But it's a good inlet for kids to learn computing nevertheless.

  7. I don't get it by Xaedalus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is this guy living with his mom if he's such a great and skilled hacker? Where's his money? Where's his grandiose lifestyle? What is he doing with all those computers he's woven into a bot-net? If he's making all that money, why isn't he spending it?

    I wonder if we're making the Chinese Dragon out to be far more fearsome than it actually is. Why exactly should I be afraid of him, and all his Chinese brethren? Yes, they can hack, yes they can start and fight a cyber-war. But I am underwhelmed by their power if all they do is sit there day after day, coding, hacking, "making money", and not doing anything with it. And if they do eventually start and fight a cyber war, then they will end up losing the only medium that gives their life meaning. What happens to these guys when we counter-strike (because I refuse to believe that my fellow Western neckbeards would take a cyber-ass-whuppin' from the Chinese lying down)? When their networks go down and their computers are infected or taken out, what then? I can get up and leave my computer. Can they?

    I'm a naive bumpkin most likely, I just fail to see how these guys are so formidable. Pathetic is more like it, like a boxer with a glass jaw. Their greatest strength is actually their weakness.

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    1. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not uncommon in Chinese culture (and in many other non-western cultures) to live with your parents until you get married.

    2. Re:I don't get it by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Someone already said it, but in many places around the world, especially china, families tend to live together.

    3. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In some foreign cultures you're expected to stay with your parents, then take care of them when they get old. If you marry, the bride joins you in the family house. It's a mutually beneficial arrangement: you're taken care of during the first part of your life, they're taken care of during the last part of theirs.

      Not everyone subscribes to the "you're 18? Get the fuck out, good luck with everything" mentality so prevalent in the west.

    4. Re:I don't get it by fishexe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is this guy living with his mom if he's such a great and skilled hacker? Where's his money? Where's his grandiose lifestyle? What is he doing with all those computers he's woven into a bot-net? If he's making all that money, why isn't he spending it?

      Because it's traditional in Chinese society to live with your parents until you're married. It's becoming less common as time goes on, but I have several friends in China in their mid-to-late 20s who have good-paying careers but still live with their parents. It doesn't have the stigma that it has in the west. And he's probably saving his money up because that's prudent. Another thing about Chinese culture, prudence doesn't make you "uncool".

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  8. Re:But, They watched him work! by mrpiddly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The journalist is only writing to their audience. Just because you do not fit into this audience does not make the article any less valid. The target audience does not want to hear about the technical details of the process, they just want an overview, concentrating on the human side of the issue. (The sense of superiority among some people with technical knowledge is really astounding.)

  9. She's not stupid by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oddly, Majia said his parents did not know that he was hacking at night [hacking is illegal in China].

    His parents know. If he hacks for money, is up late at night fiddling with computers all the time, and talks about hacking with unusual guests right in front of his mom, she knows what is going on. This is a mother with traditional, conservative beliefs who does not want to be rude and is reluctant to admit that her son is a criminal, so she ignores the entire situation. Not that unusual, and not indicative of some strange counter cultural underworld that is unique to China. Though I'm sure my folks and my friends' parents all thought our blue boxes, black boxes, and mobile (as in, in a car) collections of computers and cordless phones were all for educational purposes back in the day, and the 2600 meetings were just to hang out and drink coffee, since that's what we told them.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.