Slashdot Mirror


Harder-Than-Diamond Natural Carbon Crystals Found

HikingStick tips a piece from the science desk at MSNBC.com about a new, naturally occurring form of carbon found in a meteorite fragment. "Researchers were polishing a slice of the carbon-rich Havero meteorite that fell to Earth in Finland in 1971. When they then studied the polished surface they discovered carbon-loaded spots that were raised well above the rest of the surface — suggesting that these areas were harder than the diamonds used in the polishing paste... [G]raphite layers were shocked and heated enough to create bonds between the layers — which is exactly how humans manufacture diamonds... [The research] team took the next step and put the diamond-resistant crystals under the scrutiny of some very rigorous mineralogical analyzing instruments to learn how its atoms are lined up. That allowed them to confirm that they had, indeed, found a new 'phase' or polymorph of crystalline carbon as well as a type of diamond that had been predicted to exist decades ago, but had never been found in nature until now."

9 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. Re:How long by dohzer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wouldn't bother. It turns out that it's less expensive than a diamond, so women won't be as happy with it.

  2. Re:Majorly confused now by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A much better name for this stuff would be "carbonite", obviously.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  3. Re:How long by jimicus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wouldn't bother. It turns out that it's less expensive than a diamond, so women won't be as happy with it.

    Give DeBeers a few years and then see.

  4. Re:One thing I don't get... by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does this mean De Beers will try to monopolize space as well?

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  5. Re:The De Beers Myth by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So you are saying that De Beers is only as big as everyone else combined? Crack a history book. Until the last decade, their business practices have been deplorable, and they are still huge.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  6. Read more carefully by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wasn't defending De Beers. They have engaged in 'business practices' that are akin to that of organized crime. I was simply pointing out that they are not a monopoly. Reading comprehension is important and you need more practice.

  7. Re:One thing I don't get... by dziban303 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Once again the news media gets something very basic very wrong. From TFA's headline:

    Crystalline carbon has never been found in nature until now

    Uhm, what do you think a fucking diamond is? Chopped liver? No. Chicken dinner? No. Random collections of carbon atoms in no particular order? No. It's a crystal. Of carbon. Crystalline carbon.

    BUT WAIT!! -- There's more! What about pencil lead!? Wow-it, too, is a form of cabon? In a crystal lattice?

    Idiot science reporters should go back to covering the MTV music awards.

  8. Re:One thing I don't get... by AtomicOrange · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That... or Wikipedia got /.ed by some gung-ho reader that wanted to edit something that wouldn't get immeadiately marked as irrelevant.

    --
    "What is there a tank on the boat? WHY IS THERE A TANK ON THE BOAT?!?" L4D2
  9. THIS crystalline carbon has never been found... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the headline was about a musician granting an interview, and the sub-header was "Famous performer never interviewed before", you wouldn't be scoffing "What? You mean no famous performer has ever been interviewed? Well I have a thousand back issues of Rolling Stone that would disagree!"

    What they're saying is that they have discovered a crystalline carbon, and it is something never seen in nature before. The sentence is accurate.

    Yes the truncated verbal style often used in headlines may have made it less clear than it could have been by the simple expedient of adding "This".

    Nevertheless, this is a perfect example of why I find pedantry to be so useless outside of technical fields where precise meanings not only exist but are required. Because more often than not, pedantry is just a way to fail to understand what is being said.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are