Slashdot Mirror
Bill Gates Knows What You Did Last Summer
theodp writes "Give Bill Gates your 'pictures, videos, documents, e-mail, instant messages, addresses, calendar dates/scheduling information (e.g., birthdays, anniversaries, appointments), voice mail, phone logs, RSS feeds, subscriptions, bookmarks, mail lists, project management features, computing device data, tasks and location data,' and he'll improve your 'quality of life.' That's the promise behind a patent issued Thursday to Bill Gates and his 20 co-inventors for 'Personal Data Mining', which Microsoft notes 'can include a monetization component' that 'could initiate an auction to sell information to the highest bidder.'"
When Google does it, it's okay. Thats why Slashdot has the evil Borg for Bill Gates and the friendly Google logo for Google.
So I guess the real choice is whether you want Bill Gates to have all your data, or Steve Jobs. But either way, google already has it. :)
Being free from the manipulations of other people who think they know what is best for me is an absolutely indispensable part of a quality life. Be it marketers or moralists, I don't care.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
Trust no one, especially not a publicly traded, for-profit corporation.
Isn't that already called Google, where you give them your email, your pictures, your videos, your calendar, all your documents, all your web searches, and about half of your total web surfing (*cough* analytics *cough* doubleclick *cough)?
That's why double-click and google-analytics are on my blocked no-script list.
I think I can dissolve your confusion.
Real privacy would mean you get to decide whether this data is collected in the first place. If it's going to be gathered anyway and you might get a little discretion over how it is used once amassed, that's not real privacy. Sort of like the way that the ability to choose your master is not real freedom.
It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
If you are confidant that others can not use personal information against you, then there is no need for privacy. For instance, if everyone knew everything about everyone, then everyone would know that someone was using your information against you, and could act against that person.
You don't think that a guarantee of privacy would have made, say, Alan Turing's life much better? If you do things that are not morally wrong, but other people think they are then privacy is very much essential for your quality of life.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
You get such interesting stuff when it's way off.
I recently picked up, at a going out of business sale, a piece of jewelry that was normally $1200 for less than $200.
Since then, I've gotten several high end credit card offers, none of which I would normally qualify for.
So mess with the system.
Use your grocery store card... but only when buying beef jerkey and toilet paper.
Get your name on a couple strange mailing lists.
etc.
If the data becomes so worthless that they can't actually use it, they'll stop. But only if enough of us go through with this.
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
Please explain. I'm not sure where that goes. It's very unclear.
A clean interface; not wanting to own my computer; not wanting me to do everything their way; not calling design flaws "features"; not charging me for beta software; not charging me hundreds of dollars for products that should cost, at most, tens; not being cutesy and pandering to ten year olds (including Clippy).
Google treats me like I'm a respectable adult. Microsoft treats me like I'm a retarded five year old.
Free Martian Whores!
Where are all the /. posters who've said the past few months that everyone should move to Bing over Google, because Google is the evil behemoth that doesn't respect your privacy?
I'm just curious.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
I think it's time to post a link to this story again.
Yes, we all know that data-mining makes a market more efficient. Why should my mailbox be stuffed with ads that I do not care about? I, and the marketer and the retailers and everyone else, would rather the ads were relevant.
The problem is that this same data can be used to identify and persecute people who behave unfashionably. Their behavior may be perfectly moral (e.g. spanking a child, or buying a rifle, to take some pop examples), but is no longer en vogue. Privacy allowed them to continue behaving morally when the tide of fashion turned against them (i.e. society tried to drive them to immoral/inefficient behavior).
FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
If I were in the data mining business, I'd also make sure that you don't notice the disadvantage.
For example, are you sure that the interest she has to pay for some credit wouldn't be lower if the bank had not had access to some mined data which unfortunately correlates with bad payment behaviour, without her paying behaviour actually being bad?
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
The fact that someone would do all those things is in itself more data about that person's habits. The real trick is to selectively limit your audit trail so that you still appear in the middle of the distribution curve. Like schooling fish and flocking birds, the best form of anonymity is to surround yourself with a few million things just like yourself.
Sadly, the end result of this sort of behavior is that Netflix recommends I watch Transformers 2. A high price to pay, but such are the wages of freedom.
John just wasn't conditioned with the proper morality for such an environment
That pretty much applies to any environment. Working hard in the sugar mines for your insect overlords is utopia too. Serving the insect overlords is good, and serving them should bring you a sense of tranquil satisfaction. The pain they inflict in their whippings is cleansing, and motivational, and while you should avoid failing to live up to their expectations you should take pride in knowing that they care enough about you to invest time in you like that. As for the fact that you are dying of malnutrition? Death is a welcome and inevitable end to all things, and your passing will make more room and food available for your children, who are much stronger than you, and much more able to serve the overlords. In a way, this is really for the best, and you should recognize this, and it should give you tranquil satisfaction and happiness.
If you disagree, you just aren't conditioned with the proper morality for such an environment, for it is truly utopia.
Or to pose a more interesting question: What is utopia if not happiness, and if you don't care how does an invasion of privacy (in and of itself) affect your happiness?
Utopia is not simply "happiness". As a result, the follow up question misses the point.
What -is- utopia? It is an "ideal society" of liberty, equality, and harmony.
Naturally any ideal society will have happy and contented citizens, but any society with happy citizens is not necessarily a utopia. Put people in cages and condition them to be happy there is not a path to utopia. It is a means to an end that bears some superficial semblance of utopia.
Taking away liberty and equality to enforce harmony is dystopian, even if you replace liberty with 'conditioning not value it'.