Slashdot Mirror
The New National Health Plan Is Texting
theodp writes "With a gushing press release, Federal CTO Aneesh Chopra announced the launch of Text4baby, 'an unprecedented mobile health public-private partnership' designed to promote maternal and child health. Expectant women are instructed to 'Enter the date of the first day of your last menstrual period' to start receiving 'timely and expert health information through SMS text messages' until their child reaches the age of 12 months (limited to 3 free messages/week). The White House Blog has more information on the 'historic collaboration between industry, the health community and government.' Separately, the White House announced plans to spend $3,000 on 'Game-Changing' Solutions to Childhood Obesity. Once again, Dilbert proves to be scarily prescient."
Separately, the White House announced plans to spend $3,000 on 'Game-Changing' Solutions to Childhood Obesity.
3,000 bucks sounds amiss. So, quoth the linked press release:
(Bold italics mine)
Ah, they mean to give each "winner" kid $3,000 as an incentive/prize for being fit.
This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
don't appreciate coercion
Your flaky legal system hands out massively excessive prison sentences. Then uses prisoners in forced labour camps.
The US is built on coercion. Slavery is your principle.
Mod this down if you're a nationalist with their head stuck in the sand.
I give you H.R. 676, a bill which would provide simple, single-payer health care to all legal residents of the United States, but keeps getting buried by Congress in favour of their massive, complex "health reform" bill that ironically does far less for the people. This bill would actually make the US health care system better than that of most Canadian provinces, since it covers things like dental and prescription medication.
It has been shown several times that single-payer care costs far, far less in the long run, and allows you to keep everything you have now, minus the insurance company that wants profit over your own health. Unfortunately, it seems that the right wing has successfully equated the term "single payer" with socialism or communism (OMG THE REDS, RUN AWAY!), so I doubt we'll see anything this sane in the next ten years.
It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
- E. Debs
"Government is theft" is the kind of emotional political slogan I can't abide from either side
This is not a political slogan, it speaks to the nature of how government achieves its goals. The power of government stems from the threat of violence and loss of liberty. To deny that is to deny reality.
When people sit in wonderment as to how anyone could possibly oppose *favorite government program*, it's worthwhile to remind them of the ultimate source of government power, because this is the premise of the argument (call it libertarian, conservative, what have you).
The reason the U.S. Constitution was so revolutionary was because it was one of the first times these issues were taken into account. To ignore that and simply argue over a plan's perceived efficiency and pass it because "we want to," rightly gives thinking Americans pause.
If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
What Madison meant by regulation, and what our government does today, are greatly divergent. To Madison, "regulation" meant to keep commerce regular, by enforcing the rule of law, and providing a court system to adjudicate contract disputes.
-jcr
The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
Yes, actually. It's called the Safelink program, it's been around for years, and it's immensely beneficial to a large number of working poor.
https://www.safelinkwireless.com
Those who say "cellphones aren't a necessity" obviously haven't worked with the poor in this country. For most folks I know who use Safelink, it's their only means of communication with employers, social services, etc. How do you apply for a job when you don't have a phone number for the employer to call you back at?
I'm not sure what you mean by you pay nothing. If you mean that it is covered by your employer, then you are wrong. You have just been tricked by a shell game. When an employer hires people, they consider the cost of that employee. That includes both salary as well as all of the employer side payments. This includes health care.
Unfortunately for your argument, there are facts that completely contradict it. Please read this article for an appropriate attitude adjustment: http://www.physicianspractice.com/index/fuseaction/articles.details/articleID/1434.htm
Oh, and that's from a 2009 fee schedule study -- not ancient history.
So, in the end, Medicare pays as well as the insurance companies do while being 30 times more efficient.
Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
overhead in our publicly run system in Canada is under 3%. Whereas in private systems such as the US it around 30%.