Slashdot Mirror


Signs of Water Found On Saturnian Moon Enceladus

Matt_dk writes "Scientists working on the Cassini space mission have found negatively charged water ions in the ice plume of Enceladus. Their findings, based on analysis from data taken in plume fly-throughs in 2008 and reported in the journal Icarus, provide evidence for the presence of liquid water, which suggests the ingredients for life inside the icy moon. The Cassini plasma spectrometer, used to gather this data, also found other species of negatively charged ions including hydrocarbons."

6 of 79 comments (clear)

  1. The pendulum swinging by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the 19th and early 20th century, the prevailing view was that life, even intelligent life, was common in the solar system. Then as time progressed, we realized how hostile most of the world is. The moon had a vacuum, liquid water was rare, Venus was hundreds of degrees too hot. Now it seems the pendulum swings in the opposite direction as we realize how common liquid water and other precursors to life are. We now have liquid water on Mars, and circumstances on multiple moons of Jupiter and Saturn that could be conducive to life. It seems pretty clear that we aren't going to find much in the way of advance life (the only possibility for it is maybe Europa, but I'm probably overestimating the probability there just out of love for 2001) but it seems more and more likely that we will find life in the solar system on bodies other than Earth. What will find from that, who knows. But I'm willing to bet that we will find such life in the next 20 years.

    1. Re:The pendulum swinging by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are creatures on earth that do not get their energy from the sun - they live near hydrothermal vents deep in the oceans. That's one possibility that we have seen ourselves; in fact it was this discovery in part that spurred on the search for life on other planets that would normally have been written off as far as supporting life was concerned.

    2. Re:The pendulum swinging by elysiana · · Score: 4, Funny

      Aha, we have now obtained your true identity! You can come forward, Mr. Anonymous Coward. The game is up.

    3. Re:The pendulum swinging by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Informative

      So you're operating under the assumption that these lifeforms evolved independently from a spontaneously-generated source?

      No. It is only establishing that it is possible for life to exist in such environments.

      I agree it's probable that the examples on earth evolved from life that formed where solar energy was readily available. But that doesn't necessarily mean its the only possible evolutionary path, any more than our history means warm blooded live-birthing animals can only evolve in the presence of giant reptiles who get conveniently wiped out by meteors. It also doesn't mean life can begin and evolve strictly from geological energy sources... We don't really have a good model of abiogenesis, but the things we're pretty sure are at least prerequisites are water, organic compounds like amino acids, and energy.

      I'm not ready to say that the source of energy must be the sun.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:The pendulum swinging by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is also a fairly common biological origin hypothesis that the thermo-chemical powered life found near vents was the earliest kind of life on earth and solar powered life evolved from it. This hypothesis fits our current understanding of earths early seas rather well. Though I don't think there is any way to advance it to a theory due to the near absolute lack of fossil records from that period.

  2. Re:Why would liquid water... by garg0yle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have scientists been able to throw together basic ingredients of living things and have the resulting pile resemble anything even close to life? Even in perfectly favorable lab settings?

    yep

    (Depending on how you define "life", of course)

    --
    Modding "-1, Troll" is not a proper response if you disagree with me. Try reason.