Slashdot Mirror


Appeals Court Rules On Internet Obscenity Standards

dark_requiem writes "The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that online content can be judged by the standards of the strictest community that is able to access it. The court upheld the conviction of pornography producer Paul F. Little, aka Max Hardcore, for violating obscenity laws in Tampa, despite the fact that the 'obscene' material in question was produced and sold in California. From the article: 'The Atlanta-based court rejected arguments by Little's attorneys that applying a local community standard to the Internet violates the First Amendment because doing so means material can be judged according to the standards of the strictest communities. In other words, the materials might be legal where they were produced and almost everywhere else. But if they violate the standards of one community, they are illegal in that community and the producers may be convicted of a crime. ... Jurors in Little's trial were told to judge the materials on the basis of how "the average person of the community as a whole — the Middle District of Florida" — would view the material.'"

6 of 697 comments (clear)

  1. Re:So Iran's standards then? by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's really humourous when you live on the same Continent and watch with complete confusion as their entire country sues itself to death. I truly can't believe how litigious their society has become.

    If I were American I'd sue you for saying that

  2. The First Amendment (*) by VShael · · Score: 3, Funny

    We clearly all forgot that little footnote in the Bill of Rights which says "not a guarantee, void where prohibited by law, some rights sold separately"

  3. Wow, they're strict! by name_already_taken · · Score: 4, Funny

    We just need to file a lawsuit in Fascistville, Texas to have the whole internet taken down for obscenity. Trust me, I'm a Texan--we've got plenty of towns that would do.

    They're so strict they don't even allow proportionally spaced fonts!

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  4. Very strict about polygamy . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that online content can be judged by the standards of the strictest community that is able to access it.

    Well, here in my parts, we are pretty damned strict about polygamy . . .

    . . . so change your monogamous ways, or be sued by me . . .

    . . . oh, and yes, my family tree has routing loops . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  5. Re:perl by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Funny

    You'd let anybody have the wonders of perl? You would cast perl's before swine?

    (Perl's code, that is)

  6. Re:So Iran's standards then? by rajafarian · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... why the 1600s? Fuck if I know..

    Maybe because that's the beginning of science as we know it? What with Galileo (1564 to 1642), Rene Descarte (1596 – 1650), Leibnitz (1646 - 1716)), and Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626) being from that era. Heck, maybe to them the Roman Inquisition are the good old days?