Slashdot Mirror


Sony Announces First 3D Blu-ray Disc Players

angry tapir writes "Sony has announced a new 3D Blu-ray Disc player and upgrades to existing players so that they will be able to show high-definition 3D movies too. The company introduced the BDP-S470 Blu-ray Disc model and upgraded existing home theater systems, which will be able to play Blu-ray movies when related firmware for the devices is released later this year. Movies based on the Blu-ray 3D specification, which was finalized by the Blu-ray Association in December, can be shown on the players."

13 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. It is HDMI, forget DisplayPort for TV by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sony and Blu-Ray are behind HDMI, as is every other media company around. Any TV that does not support HDMI will have no market share.

  2. Re:What about the PS3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/10/ps3-getting-3d-firmware-update-this-summer/
    Or, maybe this summer

  3. Re:What about the PS3? by Gandhi+of+War · · Score: 5, Informative

    It says in the first linked article that the PS3 will be supported by the Blu-ray 3D specs.

  4. Re:Launch PS3? by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Shouldn't be an issue I think. The CPU and GPU specs have the same level of processing power. Only items removed after launch were the PS2 hardware emulation and a few I/O ports on newer units.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  5. Re:Launch PS3? by Edgewize · · Score: 3, Informative

    You would be amazed what firmware can do. Sony recently announced a revision to the physical disc format that places the pits closer together to increase storage by a significant percentage... and all existing Blu-Ray drives will be made compatible via firmware.

    There is a reason that these drives cost so much to manufacture. The physical hardware is incredibly generic, and nobody really knows the limits of its capabilities.

  6. Re:Stereoscopic != 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Claiming that a stereoscopic picture is the equivalent of a 3 dimensional projection is the equivalent of presenting a stereo entertainment center and claiming that it is surround sound.

    Stereoscopic, def.: "The viewing of objects as three-dimensional."

    Clue: you're being a douche when you rant on threads you have nothing to contribute, beside the obvious.

  7. Re:Right, but... by dangitman · · Score: 4, Informative

    60Hz transfers only of half the screen, so they're 30 Hz effective.

    Not at 60p, it doesn't. 60p, whether at 1080 or 720 resolution tranfers a full frame 60 times per second. It's only interlaced formats that are transfer half the image with each refresh.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  8. Re:HDMI spec by dangitman · · Score: 1, Informative

    HDMI is supported by just about everything save for Apple.

    Trolling again, I see. Apple computers are perfectly capable of outputting over HDMI.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  9. Re:HDMI spec by Hatta · · Score: 2, Informative

    To receive what? Analog TV is dead in the US. If you're still watching OTA broadcasts, spend an hour on a weekend to make one of these. It works much better for DTV than rabbit ears. I found the reflector to be unnecessary.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  10. Re:This is ridiculous. by theJML · · Score: 3, Informative

    The thing with the 3D spec's is that it's all in the TV. BluRay's just provide the 3d imaging (left and right frames) it's the TV then projects it, however the hell it wants to... active/passive glasses, polarized fields, stereoscopy, Dolby3D, Real3D, hell, even red-blue or magic eye if that's how the set works.

    Personally, I think the 3D thing is cool, it's finally bringing this stuff into the main stream that's going to make industry focus on ways to make it not suck. And I figure by the time they work that part out, it'll be about time to upgrade my currently 7 year old 1080i CRT to something a bit flatter and bigger without feeling like I didn't get my money's worth out of the current set (and relegating it to another room).

    --
    -=JML=-
  11. Re:Right, but... by Khyber · · Score: 2, Informative

    Holy shit have you been in a cave? We've had 60Hz progressive scan for ages in LCD and Plasma TVs!

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  12. Re:Right, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You're out of touch with the market then, aren't you?

    PS3 & XBox360 both support 1080p @ 60Hz, and all TVs listed as 1080p will support 60Hz input.

    In terms of movies playing at 60Hz, no. Most are of course still recorded at 24 fps on film.

  13. Re:Right, but... by Scarumanga · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually your a tad wrong there, the Xbox360 can output full 1080p over its HD Component output's, you just need decent HDTV that supports 1080p over component (like sharp aquos). This is how i have my 360 setup as its a first gen.