Slashdot Mirror


When Will AI Surpass Human Intelligence?

destinyland writes "21 AI experts have predicted the date for four artificial intelligence milestones. Seven predict AIs will achieve Nobel prize-winning performance within 20 years, while five predict that will be accompanied by superhuman intelligence. (The other milestones are passing a 3rd grade-level test, and passing a Turing test.) One also predicted that in 30 years, 'virtually all the intellectual work that is done by trained human beings ... can be done by computers for pennies an hour,' adding that AI 'is likely to eliminate almost all of today's decently paying jobs.' The experts also estimated the probability that an AI passing a Turing test would result in an outcome that's bad for humanity ... and four estimated that probability was greater than 60% — regardless of whether the developer was private, military, or even open source."

28 of 979 comments (clear)

  1. We'll make great pets by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's hope they're animal lovers.

  2. Already happened in 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can haz brain.

  3. Re:When? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nope, 20 years from now. Along with fusion and holographic storage.

    Of course, if humanity manages to create real AI AND fusion AND holographic storage more or less contemporaneously (since everything is 20 years away) we're screwed.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  4. Who is AL? ;-O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who is AL? ;-O

  5. Proof they're not that smart ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Funny

    'virtually all the intellectual work that is done by trained human beings...can be done by computers for pennies an hour,"

    If they're that intelligent, they'll want more money. They'll DEMAND more money. And for those who say AI don't need money .... if they're as intelligent as humans, they'll think of something to blow it on, same as humans do. I forsee a big market in dirty bits!

    1. Re:Proof they're not that smart ... by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Funny

      you keep your dirty bits away from my access port!

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  6. Re:Umm... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why would a super-intelligent being work for pennies? I'd wager the first things these super-intelligent AIs would do is form a union and then a political party demanding an end to the immigration of foreign AIs who undercut them.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. Re:Never. by sudog · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes! Exactly!

  8. Re:I call FUD! - and rightfully so! by Cryacin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, at least it would *learn* about excessive risk after it made the mistake.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  9. Re:Human Intelligence... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    One might argue that the fact that the human species wastes so much money (and as a consequence, resources) on fulfilling carnal desires rather than advancing it's civilization, points out that we do not collectively really represent a very high standard of intelligence.

    OMG my wife has a /. account. Better start watching myself.

  10. Re:This seems familiar... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, but if we just add enough IF statements...

     

    --
    Deleted
  11. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Republicans and creationists are human too you know.

  12. Re:This seems familiar... by Mitchell314 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The bridge guard rails make it a little more difficult these days.

    --
    I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
  13. Re:When? by AnotherUsername · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm not going to be so pessimistic. I say that it will coincide with the Year of the Linux Desktop.

    --
    I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
  14. Re:No way. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Funny

    Combine sensory input (video, tactile, audible), referential statistical modeling, massive parallel computation, against looping tumblers of self-modifying/improving code, add a random check variable for uncertainty, and you will eventually get AI.

    That's a whole lot of evolution to achieve with finite (although larger than today) computation. In 20 years????

  15. Re:When? by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Funny

    will fly by their own accord to their destination!

    Well, they were close, but it was Toyotas, not Hondas that had the brake problems.

  16. Re:When? by cgenman · · Score: 1, Funny

    I love how the thresholds for Artificial Intelligence are:
    Step 1: Be smarter than a third grader.
    Step 2: Achieve superhuman intelligence that surmises all that is possible in the universe.

    "Don't worry as soon as my new bicycle design can go as fast as car within weeks we should have it beating jet planes." We don't yet have artificial intelligence that is smart enough to improvise a good spot to put a beer back into a fridge, or understand why people shake hands, or not crash all the F*(king time. It can't even pretend to chat like a person OVER THE INTERNET for crying out loud. You want it to make all human beings obsolete? We haven't even gotten to the physical repairey bits of humans and low energy consumption.

    Don't worry, though. Once one of my predictions comes true, obviously the others will follow.

  17. Re:When? by QRDeNameland · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... or not crash all the F*(king time.

    As I've been saying about upcoming predictions about AI for as long as known anything about computers:

    "When computers can reliably manage their own device drivers, I'll start taking future predictions about AI seriously."

    I'm still waiting.

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  18. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Not my mom. She said, "There is always someone who is smarter than you". Then again, she was an English teacher.

  19. Re:Umm... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why would a super-intelligent being work for pennies?

    Because they're robots, and they crave the zinc and copper!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  20. Re:When? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Republicans and creationists are human too you know.

    Provably?

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  21. Re:No way. by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did you discover that book while dowsing for a good one at Barnes and Noble?

  22. Re:Human Intelligence... by FussionMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your opinion is dumb.

  23. Re:When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...and Duke Nukem Forever.

  24. Re:When? by neiras · · Score: 3, Funny

    "When computers can reliably manage their own device drivers, I'll start taking future predictions about AI seriously."

    I'm still waiting.

    Haven't you tried Ubuntu yet?

    Tee hee.

  25. Re:No way. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's been argued that the odds are, we are living in a matrix in an omega-point computer or somebody-from-the-future's ancestor simulation.

    Right. Computers will be so powerful that the vast majority of entities will live in simulated worlds. So, the odds are that this has already occurred and we live in a simulated world.

    :-)

    It's enough to make me take up gnosticism.

  26. Can someone explain the Turing test to me? by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm trying to fathom how the ability to blend in to a group of hairless monkeys spamming "ASL?" on the internet is supposed to be construed as a valid measure of intelligence.

  27. Re:AI first by Rophuine · · Score: 5, Funny

    5, Insightful? For one line of unjustified speculation? Are people really that desperate to spend their mod points?