Slashdot Mirror


NASA Solar Probe Blasts Toward Rendezvous With Sun

coondoggie writes "NASA this morning used a United Launch Alliance Atlas rocket to blast its 6,800lb Solar Dynamics Observatory into an orbit 22,300 miles above Earth. The $808 million spacecraft will ultimately study the Sun and send back what NASA called a prodigious rush of pictures about sunspots, solar flares and a variety of other never-before-seen solar events. The idea is to get a better idea of how the Sun works and let scientists better forecast the space weather to offer earlier warnings to protect astronauts and satellites, NASA said."

9 of 90 comments (clear)

  1. First we bomb the moon... by PumpkinDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...now we're sending a spaceship to the sun?? I hope they're at least sending it at night so it won't get burnt.

    1. Re:First we bomb the moon... by Adriax · · Score: 3, Funny

      Almost 24 hours a day? You mean this thing gets a break every day?
      Damn robot rights lobby! Next thing you know it'll be asking for weekends and holidays off!

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  2. Rendezvous ? by mbone · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think that I will go outside and rendezvous with the Sun too.

    However, even if it isn't going much closer to the Sun than my back yard, it is in a cool orbit.

    SDO is a sun-pointing semi-autonomous spacecraft that will allow nearly continuous observations of the Sun with a continuous science data downlink rate of 130 Megabits per second (Mbps). The spacecraft is 4.5 meters high and over 2 meters on each side, weighing a total of 3100 kg (fuel included). SDO's inclined geosynchronous orbit was chosen to allow continuous observations of the Sun and enable its exceptionally high data rate through the use of a single dedicated ground station.

    So, it is in a geostationary orbit with the major advantage of the L1 Lagrange point (continuous observations) but requiring less fuel to reach, less power to communicate, and only one ground station (a L1 observatory needs 3, or sufficient on-board recording). That sounds like a major win for this new orbit, which I predict will be used more in the future.

    With this orbit, it might also be able to get some cool pictures of Lunar eclipses, which SOHO (at the L1 Lagrange point) can never do.

    1. Re: Rendezvous ? by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It will be equipped with its own artificial eclipse which will be precisely sized to look at various parts of the photosphere, corona, etc. There is not any real benefit of a lunar eclipse, since the unlit side of the moon would be.. unlit, thus making it equivalent to a small metal disk anyway. I suppose you could talk about lunar mountain ranges, but frankly, the point of an orbital sun-observing satellite is that there isn't any atmosphere to drown out your signal with diffuse light. That is particularly important *before* the occulting disk: the atmosphere can't scatter light that never reaches the atmosphere.

      Good observations can be made if the occulting disk is *ahead* of the atmosphere, the problem being the moon is the only appropriately sized disk for an earthbound observatory to use, and it's on the moon's time. If the moon is what you want to observe, you should be able to get pictures of it from earth as well or better than pictures from an equally distant space-based station.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re: Rendezvous ? by tweak13 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is in a geosynchronous orbit, not a geostationary orbit. Any orbit with inclination cannot be geostationary and would require multiple ground stations or a steerable antenna. It may also be possible that they are using a fixed antenna and a highly elliptical orbit, and using that to create a long period of relatively little apparent motion from earth during which to perform their downlinks. That may also be how they create longer observation times.

      Either way, this wouldn't allow continuous observation of the sun. It may be close, but at some point it is going to be near enough to the night side of earth to be in its shadow.

  3. Re:Prodigious rush by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know about the rest of you, but a little piece of me died inside when I read the comparison to iTunes: "It's like downloading 500,000 iTunes a day, NASA stated." Are comparisons to iTunes downloads really needed in today's world?

  4. Re:GPS disuption warning- a good thing by oneiros27 · · Score: 3, Informative

    These are *not* in situ instruments like what's on ACE, where it has to get hit to be known.

    Part of SDO's mission in is space weather prediction -- trying to identify active regions that are likely to flare or throw off a CME, and thus provide more advanced warning so spacecraft can take precautions.

    Disclaimer : I'm affiliated with one of the sites that's going to be distributing SDO data.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  5. Re:Prodigious rush by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or did they mean 500,000 average-length songs? When did 'an iTune' mean anything?

    Indeed. They should have used specific examples like:

    Here Comes the Sun
    Black Hole Sun
    Good Day Sunshine
    House of the Risin' Sun
    Walking on the Sun
    Blister in the Sun
    You Are the Sunshine of My Life
    Sunshower
    Don't Let the Sun Go Down On Me
    Sunless Saturday
    California Sun
    Walking on Sunshine


    You know, something like that.

  6. Re:Prodigious rush by rockNme2349 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thats 0.14 Library of Congresses / Day.

    Sorry for the confusion.

    -NASA

    --
    Sewage Treatment Facilities - "Our duty is clear."