Slashdot Mirror


Texas Textbooks Battle Is Actually an American War

ideonexus writes "I've been lackadaisical when it comes to following stories about Texas schoolboard attempts to slip creationism into biology textbooks, dismissing the stories as just 'dumbass Texans,' but what I didn't realize is that Texas schoolbooks set the standard for the rest of the country. And it's not just Creationism that this Christian coalition is attempting to bring into schoolbooks, but a full frontal assault on history, politics, and the humanities that exploits the fact that final decisions are being made by a school board completely academically unqualified to make informed evaluations of the changes these lobbyists propose. This evangelical lobby has successfully had references to the American Constitution as a 'living document,' as textbooks have defined it since the 1950s, removed in favor of an 'enduring Constitution' not subject to change, as well as attempting to over-emphasize the role Christianity played in the founding of America. The leaders of these efforts outright admit they are attempting to redefine the way our children understand the political landscape so that, when they grow up, they will have preconceived notions of the American political system that favor their evangelical Christian goals."

16 of 1,252 comments (clear)

  1. If only we could speed up time by omnibit · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's just a shame that the processes of evolution will take way too long for this rubbish to devolve or become extinct.

  2. There is no god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Get over it already

  3. Re:A Christian's take by BuR4N · · Score: 0, Troll

    I 'm guessing "Depends who's paying for the books"

    --
    http://www.intellipool.se/ - Intellipool Network Monitor
  4. Re:Refreshing! by keithpreston · · Score: 0, Troll

    But where are you learning about the wrongs of these narrow-minded zealots? Other narrow-minded zealots on the opposite extreme? I can agree that there are a lot of crazy christian narrow-minded zealots, but I think there are just as many anti-religion narrow-minded zealots. Why can't we just have education books just present multiple popular theories along with the pros and cons of each?

  5. Yet another reason... by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 0, Troll

    that "We the People..." should take up arms against those who would destroy us from the inside. It is not only my right; my responsibility; it's my obligation to my fellow countrymen, and future generations of US Americans.

    I happen to believe in God. However, I respect, and understand the reasons for keeping God out of education (one exception I would make is for private schools, which are opt-in).

    History is history because it took place in the past. The past is unchangeable, and thus, re-writing history is the same as lying. In this case I would call the people re-writing the history of our once great country's politics one thing: tyrannical. Their motivations are clearly oppressive.

    Everyone in the US should know that it's completely legal to kill tyrants. Everyone should know that it's their responsibility. The more we let the tyrants do this to us, the less we deserve the rights to freedom and liberty that they are stealing from us.

    You can have my guns, my freedom, my rights, and my liberty AFTER you pry them from my cold, dead hands.

    --
    "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    1. Re:Yet another reason... by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sugar coated tyranny is still tyranny. You're obviously the pussy as you have been brainwashed into thinking we're not under attack domestically by tyrants in government.

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
  6. Re:A Christian's take by PitaBred · · Score: 1, Troll

    Evolution doesn't claim to, either. Your ignorance is showing again. You should really keep it zipped up better.
     
    Evolution simply describes the change of organisms from one to another, from one species to another, and gives mechanisms for the "order and complexity" you mention. The sun is a very powerful force. But Evolution says nothing about the beginning of time or life. That's a question for another theory, such as the Big Bang and so on.
     
    A brief Google of your chaos bullshit would disprove it. But you don't want to be educated. Please do us a favor and keep your willful ignorance to yourself, so it doesn't contaminate someone who wants to learn.

  7. Re:Well, 'fair dos' to them by Conchobair · · Score: 1, Troll

    Because this is Slashdot and there are fundamentalist atheists here that rival fundamentalist Christian in the ability to relentlessly attack ideas that are not the same as their own.

    Pot, meet Kettle.

  8. Re:A Christian's take by anglophobe_0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    First, great sentence construction! Second, religion is not philosophy, but rather an entire system of life than encapsulates everything from philosophy to cosmology to biology to sociology to nutrition and hygiene. Last, Christianity purports to be true. If it is true, we should be able to verify it, at least the testable aspects of it. Some of Christianity's claims are untestable by scientific means, but verification of the claims that could be tested would certainly lend credibility to the untestable claims, which is why religion does intersect with science in a major way. You're drastically oversimplifying the issue.

  9. Re:Refreshing! by amilo100 · · Score: 0, Troll

    The new atheist zealotry is a lot scarier for me than christian zealotry. I don’t know what exactly makes 20 y/o atheists so angry (must be something in the drink water). But there ideas are extremely frightening.

    (They also have the ability to destroy any social site with their verbal diarrhoea I really don’t need to hear how smart atheists are. )

    It seems that my Christian friends STFU 99.99% of the time about their religion. But atheists talk 90% of the time about their religion. They repeat everything and every conversation is a repeat of the previous - It sounds like a long play record that got stuck. They also interrogate you to ensure that you are an atheist (and not an agnostic by mistake).

    \rant

  10. Re:A Christian's take by jduhls · · Score: 0, Troll

    I found the old idea to be sufficient. Lotsa folks died in the world just recently. Horribly. Sorry you feel like an idiot, though.

  11. Re:A Christian's take by Mantis8 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Allow me to shed some light on this. Here are 2 very familiar verses taken from the standard king james bible.

    Genesis 1:1 & 2
    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

    And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

    Now here's the punch line: in verse 2, the first word "was" in the ancient Hebrew texts is actually "BECAME" and not "was". This makes all the difference in the world. Now the question is: HOW did it become that way? If you read in Isaiah 14 & Ezekiel 28, you will clearly see that it was lucifer who is to blame for the destruction of the first heaven and earth. That is how it became without form and void.

    The Hebrew words for "without form and void" is "tohu va bahu". It purposely rhymes (which is a figure of speech) to draw our attention to it.

    Isaiah 45:18
    For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else.

    The words "in vain" are the exact same Hebrew word "tahu" in Genesis 1:2. He did NOTcreate it without form; it BECAME that way.

    Therefore, all the chaos, destruction, & confusion of Genesis 1:2 did not come from God.

    1 Corinthians 14:33
    For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.

    This is the second verse in the bible showing that the one, true God did not cause the chaos & destruction in Genesis 1:2

    Then who did? Satan, who is also the thief.

    John 10:10
    The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.

    This again fits perfectly with what Satan did in Genesis 1:2. No contradictions at all.

    Take a look at these verses for even more verification.

    2 Peter 3:5-7
    For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:

    Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:

    But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

    In verse 6, it tells us about the world that then was (past tense), which refers to the first world, which was in Genesis 1:1. We are dealing with the passage of time here. Now look at verse 7 - it says "But the heavens and the earth, which are now" (present tense). It's the heavens & earth we live in today.

    II Peter 3:13
    Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.

    So there you have it: for all time, there are 3 heavens & earths: the first one in Genesis 1:1 that God made; the second one that we live in today (that was destroyed by the adversary, & God rebuilt), and the third heavens & earth, which is still future.

    Very simple: past, present, future. It all fits perfectly together with no contradictions.

    Now another question is: how much time was there between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2? No one knows, but there could be eons of time there. That is the time period where all the dinosaurs lived.

    There is evolution only within species; never between genus(kinds of plant & animal life).

    God made the universe for the earth.

    God made the earth for man.

    God made man to praise God and love him out of his own, freewill choice.

    So it is evolution that does not belong in the textbooks.

    www.theway.org

    Amen.

  12. Re:How bad could it be? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yeah, but he's still the crappiest president of my lifetime.

    wow, for a 9 year old, you sure do have a really low slashdot ID.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  13. Re:A Christian's take by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yeah, the same with coal becoming a diamond, or a molecule that can exists in three states, or making a transparent window out of sand. It's magic because I don't understand it.

    I'm sorry, my sarcasm detector is seems to be on the fritz today, but did you just admit to being a complete moron in a public forum? The problems with your examples is that there are many, many people who not only do understand how they work, but can reproduce the results at will - over and over and over again.

    And yet there was a time when they didn't understand the processes involved, and would have made the same argument. Your inability to understand does not make it less rational. Also, the glass made from sand, is actually made from high amounts of silica in the sand. Just because the Bible didn't include all the details that wouldn't have made sense to man back then, (and possibly even now), it gets disregarded outright?

    Have you created a sentient/self-aware being from scratch? Do you know how it's done? If not, who are you say it's wrong? In fact, who are you? You refuse to post under your name.

  14. Re:A Christian's take by flyneye · · Score: 0, Troll

    No no, tax dollars are spent on whores , booze and Cadillacs.
    Obama will just suck a little more chinese "rock", invest in some more south American oil for his buddies blowing China and print more money to pay for textbooks.. or votes, whatever.
    I guess you could always take comfort in the words of Voltaire " If God did not exist , it would be necessary to invent him"
    Just tell yourself, this is honoring necessity. Scientists just don't "get" philosophy I guess....

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  15. Re:A Christian's take by anglophobe_0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    The last word should probably be spelled correctly. My point is, your tactic of talking down to me like I'm a child, and my tactic of harping on your ineptitude in the use of the English language are designed to make the other party feel like an idiot, without actually addressing the concerns or ideas relevant to the topic at hand. Anyway, you can have the last word, but please use grammar-check this time.