Slashdot Mirror


Wi-Fi In a SIM Card

gaijin_ writes "What if, rather than buying a MiFi or using a Wi-Fi router app like those on the Palm Pre Plus, you could stick a SIM in any device and have a shared 3G connection? That's what Sagem Orga and Telefonica are promising: they've developed the SIMFi, a USIM card with an embedded Wi-Fi radio that, when dropped into any standard handset, can share the 3G HSPA connection with various Wi-Fi clients as an instant access point."

126 comments

  1. I'm wondering by poetmatt · · Score: 1

    Beyond that my instinct says this could be huge, how big of an impact does a product like this really have? Mind you, the questions of implementation and all that aside, is this really practical or just another thing that might eventually be a standard feature?

    1. Re:I'm wondering by ircmaxell · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think that will depend on the control you have over the functionality. Will the handset be aware of the radio? Will it be able to control it (turn it on and off)? Does it support encryption?

      OTOH, it could be a portal for providing ubiquitous coverage for WiFi. Imagine having a city full of people with these (Even with reduced range to reduce the clutter). Then you would be able to access a "hot spot" from just about anywhere. Of course you'd be charged for access (by the provider most likely), but still it's a pretty cool idea...

      --
      If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    2. Re:I'm wondering by migla · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Que?

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    3. Re:I'm wondering by migla · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      disregard. I just couldn't make any sense of this comment, but then I realized it may be due to my blood alcohol level and not due to the the comment being incomprehensible.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    4. Re:I'm wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for people who are too stupid to connect a cable. The cable connection can then be removed to cut costs. So everyone has to use wireless. It can probably default to unsecured, because those same people will also be too stupid to set up security. So at least you get so see what the person sitting opposite you is looking at on the Internet, if you are really that bored.

    5. Re:I'm wondering by NightHawkeye · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can already do this with my Nokia 5530 XpressMusic. It's a basic 2G phone with WiFi. Since it's 2G, I don't pay for data services. Yet I have access to high-speed capability whenever I'm at a WiFi hotspot. I couldn't justify the cost for 3G for the occasional times I'd want to access the internet. WiFi is a great compromise.

    6. Re:I'm wondering by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course you'd be charged for access (by the provider most likely), but still it's a pretty cool idea...

      Well, someone would be charged by an ISP for a connection to the internet, but you don't necessarily need the internet. It's easy to imagine a free mesh network running over nodes like this, with everyone running as a repeater for the common good. Various local services (bus schedules, local maps, restaurant locations, ordering a cab or a pizza) could be made available by servers connected to the mesh network without anyone paying for an internet connection. And of course people could run free exit nodes off their spare bandwidth at home or something to give the network some tenuous internet access.

    7. Re:I'm wondering by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      None what so ever.
      If you have a smartphone then you would have the option to use wifi.
      If you have a feature phone you could use Bluetooth.
      If you in the US AT&T and TMobile will let you use that sim when hell freezes over.
      Really just about any smartphone could do this right now except the phone companies don't want you to do it.
      You see you will have a much better end user experience using a separate device like a USB stick. And you would only have to pay an extra 50 to 90 dollars a month for it. So you see you are much better off not using any type of tethering.
      "This message brought to you by your friendly US Cell companies. "

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:I'm wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T-Mobile at least has allowed Datajack.com to connect to their network, $39.99 bucks a month no contract. Device costs $99 to start the whole thing off, a total of $167.00 and you can Turn it off in any month you don't need to use it.

    9. Re:I'm wondering by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I think that will depend on the control you have over the functionality. Will the handset be aware of the radio? Will it be able to control it (turn it on and off)?

      SIM cards often expose customized menus to the phone. Or, describing it other way around, are allowed to take over the phone. So I guess there is a possibility of sensible integration.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    10. Re:I'm wondering by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Probably unlikely for the most part. Especially since many handsets (smart phones) have hardware that already has a wifi device as well as the ability (hardware wise) to do wifi tethering. My jailbroken G1 does this pretty nicely, though I actually use the bluetooth option, and only allow my laptop to use it. Most of the carriers specifically don't want a single account to be able to share data with multiple devices.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    11. Re:I'm wondering by aztracker1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have this backwards, TFA is talking about sharing the phone's 3G connection with other computers (say your laptop).

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    12. Re:I'm wondering by Macfox · · Score: 1

      It's call STK or SIM Application Toolkit. Fairly old GSM standard. A small update for 3G was made a while back. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIM_Application_Toolkit

      STK is clunky at best. It's a polling arrangement. The phone polls the sim and it then replies with what it wants the phone to do. You certainly couldn't get the throughput needed via the SIM slot. I haven't RTFA but given it takes about 20-30secs to download 100 contacts from your SIM, it unlikely this new card would be using the existing standards or SIM slots.

      --
      Area51 - We are watching...
    13. Re:I'm wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you think providers will allow such communism when they can make mega $$$ out of capitalism?

    14. Re:I'm wondering by Vlado · · Score: 1

      Nokia 5530 XpressMusic is a 3G phone.
      You may only have a 2G subscrition or have turned 3G off, but the phone itself is fully capable of doing 3G.

    15. Re:I'm wondering by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Assuming the cell mesh had a broad enough coverage, 3G would also be unnecessary- as long as you've got some physical broadband routers signed up to the service too, everyone's mobile phone would only be a finite number of hops from the nearest physical internet connection.

      Imagine if this service were partnered with something like FON- a service which allows members to share their internet connections with other members who are out and about. In my town there are hundreds of FON access points; a mobile phone mesh would have no problem hooking up to the nearest ones.

    16. Re:I'm wondering by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I have an app for that on my Windows Mobile phone, wmwifirouter if anyone is interested. The main problem with it is that it drains the battery very quickly.

    17. Re:I'm wondering by ircmaxell · · Score: 2, Informative

      Latency would be the problem with that kind of network. Unless the density of these routers was so high that you were never more than 3 hops away, but then you wouldn't really need to have the mesh network in the first place...

      --
      If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    18. Re:I'm wondering by felipecn · · Score: 1

      Nokia 5530 is GSM/EDGE only. No UMTS or HSDPA, so it is 2.75G. http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_5530_xpressmusic-2832.php

    19. Re:I'm wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F*CK latency!. The Internet would be free again.

    20. Re:I'm wondering by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      True, but it'd be a great backup.

      Using FON as an example- the FON network has got plenty of access points in UK these days thanks to the partnership with BT, and my town has got an AP maybe every hundred meters or so. That means I'd never be more than a few minutes walk from the nearest AP, but there are still blackspots. And if I go to a less densely populated are, or out of town, the blackspots would become more and more pervasive.

      If you worked a mobile mesh into the equation then you a) cover the blackspots in town (with only one or two hops to the nearest broadband connection) and b) extend the network to a larger absolute boundary (with greater latency). Would work a treat for in and around urban environments, and you could always keep 3G as a backup for when you head out into the sticks.

  2. iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you serve up a "hotspot" in an unlocked iPhone?

    1. Re:iPhone by jeffmeden · · Score: 0

      Good luck getting to the SIM card on an Iphone, unless by 'unlocked' you meant 'completely disassembled with many special tools'...

    2. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The sim card on all models of iphones pop out with a simple paper clip stuck in the sim caddy hole. It seems you've never actually used one.

    3. Re:iPhone by LiENUS · · Score: 2, Informative
    4. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are completely clueless, aren't you?

    5. Re:iPhone by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      The article suggests a "special" sim tool or a paper clip. Those are both special since right now I don't have either on me. And many since there are two of them. And "completely disassemble" is true also since that's as far as anyone can take an IPhone apart. So the GP is right. So there. Thhhhhbbt! :)

    6. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, nice!

    7. Re:iPhone by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Well, you would certainly have a hot spot. Cramming a wireless transmitter in a SIM card and having any kind of a respectable range, you are going to have a LOT of heat building up in that SIM.

      The chipsets in consumer routers get very warm... and that's with the silicon of the chips, shielding, heatsinks etc. In this case, you'll have a tiny microcircuit in a piece of plastic.

      How are they going to deal with heat?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:iPhone by Comboman · · Score: 1

      Since most cellphones put the SIM card under the removable battery and the iPhone doesn't have a removable battery, I can somewhat understand your confusion, but rest assured that the iPhone does indeed have a user-removable SIM card (that is actually a requirement of the GSM standard).

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    9. Re:iPhone by rsborg · · Score: 1

      The article suggests a "special" sim tool or a paper clip. Those are both special since right now I don't have either on me.

      I got a "special SIM tool" with my 3GS. I stored it in case I was going to travel (to use other GSM providers).

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    10. Re:iPhone by slim · · Score: 1

      Is this a "tribute" to Macintosh floppy disk drives?

  3. Right... but I can do that for free (unsecured) by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    With Joiku hotspot thingy.

    So I'd buy this because?

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Right... but I can do that for free (unsecured) by toadlife · · Score: 1

      The same type of solution, which I use myself, exists for Windows Mobile. Googling, I see that a solution also exists for rooted Android phones and jailbroken iPhones.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    2. Re:Right... but I can do that for free (unsecured) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unsecured? I am using Joikuspot with a WEP key. Do you have an old version?

  4. Progress. by migla · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wifi on sim? Before you know it, you will get Sy-Fy in Vim.

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    1. Re:Progress. by laederkeps · · Score: 1

      If anyone is going to implement a decent DVB-T decoder with ASCII rendering, you just know it'll be running under emacs...

    2. Re:Progress. by migla · · Score: 0, Redundant

      this claimer: I should not be posting anything at the moment.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    3. Re:Progress. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We know. You already mentioned your blood alcohol level. It's Friday afternoon and I'm drunk too, but you don't hear me reminding everyone about it, do you?

    4. Re:Progress. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/aatv/

      Should work with your DVB tuner, if it has V4L drivers, and supports textmode output to a terminal...

    5. Re:Progress. by migla · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm trying to click the parent button again and again, but I don't seem to find my way to the post you are referring to. I do have a recollection of saying just that, though. Link? (ps. If this bothers you, don't read this.)

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    6. Re:Progress. by migla · · Score: 0, Troll

      I must have talked about being drunk in another thread.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    7. Re:Progress. by migla · · Score: 1, Informative

      "We are put on this earth to fart around and don't let anybody tell you any different."

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    8. Re:Progress. by migla · · Score: 1

      Haha. If it wasn't for you, anonymous, I'd hardly ever even heard about alcoholics.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    9. Re:Progress. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:Progress. by migla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What silly idiot comes modding this a troll? Shouldn't you be modding comments that matter and comments people will actually read? Well. I'm glad I can keep one bad mod occupied down here in the dungeons. Mod this down too, I dare you. It means you won't get to touch as many comments that might matter.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    11. Re:Progress. by migla · · Score: 2, Funny

      Haha! Made you waste a mod-point!

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    12. Re:Progress. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone is going to implement a decent DVB-T decoder with ASCII rendering, you just know it'll be running under emacs...

      Not quite what you're looking for, but here's an ASCII QuickTime renderer that runs on Macs.

  5. solves the wrong problem by czmax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a technical "solution" to a non-technical problem. The ability exists today but is predominately blocked by the cell phone providers.

    This quote from the article shows how deluded these people are: "it seems likely that carriers would give the SIMFi away as long as you took out some sort of mobile data contract". If that was the case then I'd be able to use tethering on my iphone RIGHT NOW.

    Sure, neat technical hack. Nice miniaturization there. But making this functionality available in a smaller form factor isn't the problem.

    1. Re:solves the wrong problem by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Any Wi-Fi card these days can work in AP mode, so any cellphone with Wi-Fi can potentially do this already. Manufacturers just don't care to do it and/or telcos don't care to allow it.

      On an unrelated note, how on earth are they pulling this off? As far as I know, at least regular SIMs are limited to pretty low power, the data rate is really low, and they don't have access to the cellphone's data connection. I can't see this working unless USIM was expressly designed to support this kind of usage; it certainly requires a lot of cooperation from the phone, it would have to be part of the standard to begin with.

    2. Re:solves the wrong problem by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was just thinking the other day about how retarded it is that we can't do this. My phone has WiFi; I assume that the WiFi and 3G are capable of operating at the same time. My laptop has WiFi. I don't see any good reason why I can't set my phone to be an ad hoc network and let the laptop connect. If cellphone carriers are ok with selling you MiFi devices, then I don't know what'd be wrong with allowing users to do this sort of tethering with a phone.

      Obviously they want you to buy a separate data plan for every device you want to use, but then why allow the MiFi?

    3. Re:solves the wrong problem by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Bingo. Carriers go to great lengths to make it a pain in the ass to tether phones and only grudgingly allow it in limited cases for extra money as long as you use their proprietary "dialer". They want the process to be annoying enough that people only do it when they have absolutely no other choice. There are plenty of smartphones with built-in WiFi but I can't think of a single branded phone (in the US) that has the necessary software installed. If carriers wanted to facilitate this type of thing, they'd already be doing it. Instead, we have to rely on third party software and, occasionally, "hacking" the device to restore functionality that's been removed.

    4. Re:solves the wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the real question is: If your cellphone is already on a carrier that offers mifi (Verizon and Sprint in US), at what price (fixed plus monthly cost) would you buy this wifi-on-a-SIM *instead of* the mifi device with it's separate dataplan?

    5. Re:solves the wrong problem by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

      Treos all have it, you will have to do a little digging in the windows directory for the executable but it is there.

    6. Re:solves the wrong problem by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And then since there's plenty of combo bluetooth/wireless chips already in phones, there's no reason to put this functionality in the SIM anyway.

    7. Re:solves the wrong problem by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      At least in the UK the mifi is marketed as a "mobile broadband" device with "mobile broadband" plans.

      What the carriers don't want you doing is using an "unlimited" phone data plan with a PC because PCs can much more easilly use a hell of a lot of data. I doubt they would care too much about you using your phone to browse on a "mobile broadband" plan.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:solves the wrong problem by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Meh, I can do USB tethering on my Android phone (Hero) right now. It's as easy as going into the menu and enable the tethering, and then plugging it into my laptop. I was a must have feature for me. No 20 euro additional charge - and for 30 euro a month for my ADSL I have telco WiFi access points to boot. Just don't buy an iPhone. I must admit that the persons in the telco provider shop were rather reluctant in admitting that it was possible.

      PS for those in NL, that's KPN mobile and XS4ALL ADSL I'm using, I haven't had time to do tethering over my Bluetooth connections, and I heard it is tricky and consumes rather a lot of power if I could get it working. Nice thing is that the bigger laptop battery is also powering the phone if you use USB, but you do have a wire to worry about.

    9. Re:solves the wrong problem by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      I don't see any good reason why I can't set my phone to be an ad hoc network and let the laptop connect.

      Um, you can with a phone that isn't locked down so you can't use it..

      Windows Mobile - WMWifiRouter
      Symbian - JoikuSpot

      A quick google says there's one for Android but it requires rooting; same for iPhone.

    10. Re:solves the wrong problem by Splab · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you live in the US.

      I work for a Telecom in EU and we coulnd't care less if you where tethering your handset, 3G data traffic is cheap and if you tether your phone/device, chances are you are opting for a large dataplan which means we earn money, or if you are less inlighted and opt for a pay per MB we would be even happier.

    11. Re:solves the wrong problem by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that just what we call "tethering"? That is, where your phone acts as a modem for your computer?

      I'm not aware of anyone doing it with WiFi as you describe, but I'm fairly sure many phones can do it via BlueTooth. That is to say, they can use their 3G connection to hook up to the internet, and then serve that data via BlueTooth to your laptop. USB cables are an option too.

  6. Antenna? by molo · · Score: 4, Informative

    You still need a 2.4GHz antenna, which at 1/4 wavelength is more than 2cm. Where are they going to put it? Certainly not in a standard SIM chip package.

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:Antenna? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a reduced distance? The power will be very low anyway, and there isn't much need for a rate higher than 1mbit (at least with 3g). How is it that those little bluetooth dongles work that are no longer/wider than a USB plug (1cm)?

    2. Re:Antenna? by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of 2cm 2.4Ghz antennas - see 90% of the Bluetooth dongles out there. They may not be the most efficient antennas in the world, but they do work.

    3. Re:Antenna? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      You are assuming that the manufacturers will favour electrical law over design aesthetics.

      I'm more worried about the effect this will have on battery drain. Will each sim come with an external cell in a shoulder bag?

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    4. Re:Antenna? by adolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      I agree -- it's not practical. Just look around: there's no other products that manage to shrink an antenna down in size, and still operate at 2.4GHz, are there?

      Given the severe lack of anyone doing stuff like this, it must be impossible to use an antenna shorter than a quarter-wavelength for anything, ever. I mean, it's obvious, isn't it?

    5. Re:Antenna? by EkriirkE · · Score: 1
      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    6. Re:Antenna? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      A standard SIM is 25mm by 15mm. 1/4 wavelength at that frequency is about... 25mm.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:Antenna? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Considering that it would be probably used predominatly as "personal hotspot" (giving data access from a mobile phone which you carry...to devices which you are using), the range can be quite a bit less than in typical WiFi hotspot.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    8. Re:Antenna? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be straight... Just imagine, if you will, a 2cm long antenna with a 90 degree right turn in it every 0.5cm. I'm pretty sure that would fit in a SIM.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    9. Re:Antenna? by molo · · Score: 1

      Okay, good point. I shouldn't say that its not possible to emit RF within that package, but it certainly becomes less efficient and less practical. Range, sensitivity and power efficiency will suffer.

      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    10. Re:Antenna? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Okay, good point. I shouldn't say that its not possible to emit RF within that package, but it certainly becomes less efficient and less practical. Range, sensitivity and power efficiency will suffer.

      Less efficient and practical compared to what? An 802.11 radio+antenna which doesn't fit into a SIM card?

      If so, then you're comparing apples to oranges.

      (You're an engineer, aren't you?)

    11. Re:Antenna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      antennas don't really work like that. If you are assuming a dipole antenna you really need a straight line that is 2.5 cm. There are other types of antennas though, all with varying issues, of efficiency, etc.

    12. Re:Antenna? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      People with EyeFi cards seem to do well enough. They are WiFi devices in an SD card, which isn't much larger than a SIM card.

    13. Re:Antenna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know absolutely nothing about radio waves, but are there any particular problems with using the phone itself as the antenna?

    14. Re:Antenna? by rey1024 · · Score: 1

      may new technology can hiding wireless antena or including it on sim card. nice news

    15. Re:Antenna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      diagonal perhaps?

    16. Re:Antenna? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet all of the products mentioned by adolf are using some sort of fractal antenna design.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_antenna

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    17. Re:Antenna? by yellekc · · Score: 1

      In many cases, such as this one, there is no need for perfect 1:1 VSWR. In broadcast, you can have several kilowatts, or more, of RF power going into an antenna. A high VSWR can be very bad. When you only need milliwatts of ERP, you can deal with inefficient antennas.

    18. Re:Antenna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey - that's not a fair dig at engineers! One of the skills a GOOD engineer has is the ability to balance conflicting requirements and come up with the optimum solution.

    19. Re:Antenna? by adolf · · Score: 1

      And while I'm sure you'll probably never read this, I'm willing to bet that you're wrong (and I only bet on a sure thing).

      I own the dealxtreme bluetooth adapter that I linked, and I've had it apart*.

      The antenna is just a short pattern of traces that looks like this:

      _ _ _ _
      | | | | | | | |
        |_| |_| |_|

      The proportions are about right**, incidentally, in ASCII form. The widgth of the squiggle is about 6mm according to my ruler. And, frankly, there ain't much fractal about that -- it's just a squiggle printed on a circuit board. It works OK; certainly well enough for the Personal Area Networking stuff that bluetooth is made for, and also for the near-range stuff that the 802.11 device mentioned in TFA is meant for.

      *: I've had it apart, because it's a lousy little thing. It worked at best intermittently, by default. I cursed it, took it apart, looked at it, and soldered the crystal to the ground pad beneath it. It has been flawless since. One might say that it is a poorly assembled, poorly designed adapter, but for less than $2 shipped plus a bit of ingenuity, I'm not complaining. It really does work rather well within a dozen or so feet, after modification. I'd not expect 802.11 to behave much differently.

      **: And since Slashdot's preview function seems to be trashing my wonderful ASCII art: If the picture it looks illegible, the idea is this: /\/\/\/\. Except, with square corners. It's not a very special antenna.

  7. Not gonna happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll take things that will never be implemented by an American telcom for $1000, Alex.

  8. Expensive? by Darkon · · Score: 1

    share the 3G HSPA connection with various Wi-Fi clients as an instant access point

    Great... I can has cheap 3G data access now? Don't know what it's like in the US, but this side of the pond I'm looking at at least £1 per Mb.

    1. Re:Expensive? by richtaur · · Score: 1

      Most of the US nerds like me probably have infinite data plans on their mobile devices, spending ~$80/month.

    2. Re:Expensive? by crwl · · Score: 1

      Jesus. Here in Finland I pay 9.8€/mo (about $13.4) for my unlimited 3G data plan. Without any forced bundle package, tie-in to a particular phone or anything like that.

      ...and I can share the connection over Wi-fi with JoikuSpot Lite for free with my Symbian phone...

    3. Re:Expensive? by cheesewire · · Score: 1

      If you're paying £1/Mb, shop around.

      I have no idea about on contract, but three has 30p/MB on PAYG, after your initial "free" 150MB per topup (6.6p/MB @ £10topup).
      Or if you just want mobile net access for your laptop, its £15/month = 5GB/month or £7.50/month = 1GB/month over the air.

    4. Re:Expensive? by LiquidFire_HK · · Score: 1

      You can also get 1 GB for 5 pounds with the Internet Monthly addon (which are taken from your topped-up money, so you essentially pay 10 pounds and get 1.15 GB + 5 pounds for calls or a few more MB). Or just top up 5 pounds online and get a decent 1 GB for 5 pounds, 0.5p/MB.

    5. Re:Expensive? by RichM · · Score: 1

      Great... I can has cheap 3G data access now? Don't know what it's like in the US, but this side of the pond I'm looking at at least £1 per Mb.

      No idea where you pulled that number from - you only get charged that much if you go over your allowance.
      I use HSDPA on 3 (three.co.uk) and I pay £15 for 3GB of data on Pay as you Go.
      I use the 3G modem for my home computer and get speeds of 3MBit usually, if I run out I just buy a voucher from any shop and top up using my web browser. If you use data cards on contract, you're asking for trouble.

  9. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joikuspot has been doing this for ages.

  10. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, a way to tether with my iPhone.

  11. upgrade dumb to smart phone? by amigabill · · Score: 1

    This could be a start for those of us not willing to pay monthly data plan fees to get a smart phone out of our dumb phone. I don't want to pay a hefty monthly fee just to own a smarter phone. Oh, wait, I have Verizon, no SIM slot. So I can't use it anyway. What about a microSD equivalent, with some brains as well as a radio and of course some flash memory?

    1. Re:upgrade dumb to smart phone? by trapnest · · Score: 1

      TFS mentions a "USIM", so this is CDMA technology.

    2. Re:upgrade dumb to smart phone? by StayFrosty · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about combining flash memory and a radio on one card. However, plain, old microSD wifi cards have been on the market for quite a while now.

      --
      "Frequently wrong, never in doubt."
    3. Re:upgrade dumb to smart phone? by felipecn · · Score: 1

      WCDMA technology, so UMTS. That's the "3G evolution" of GSM. There is also CSIM (or R-UIM), for CDMA phones, but I think only KDDI Japan uses them. You won't find a (pure CDMA) Verizon phone with slot for a SIM.

    4. Re:upgrade dumb to smart phone? by trapnest · · Score: 1

      Consider me learned.

  12. Carriers will have a shitfit by Mark19960 · · Score: 1

    They won't like this one bit and go to great lengths to disallow or prevent it from working.

    1. Re:Carriers will have a shitfit by CdBee · · Score: 1

      Given that the carriers distribute the SIMs for their networks, not hard for them to prevent it !

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    2. Re:Carriers will have a shitfit by Scutter · · Score: 1

      They won't like this one bit and go to great lengths to disallow or prevent it from working.

      Most US carriers already officially disallow tethering preferring instead that you subscribe with an additional device (like an Aircard or a MiFi), and charge you a healthy premium for the privilege. In some cases you can fly under the radar, like with a jailbroken iPhone on AT&T.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    3. Re:Carriers will have a shitfit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI: Telefonica is one of the top carriers of Spain and has a lot of international subsidiaries.

    4. Re:Carriers will have a shitfit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarilly;

      There exist certain hacktastic solutions for inserting 2 simcards into a handset at once, and having both co-exist peacefully. If you were to do this with one that is a traditional phone SIM, and then have this special SIM as the other, you could do this on your phone and they would be hard pressed to stop you.

    5. Re:Carriers will have a shitfit by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      They won't like this one bit and go to great lengths to disallow or prevent it from working.

      Most US carriers already officially disallow tethering preferring instead that you subscribe with an additional device (like an Aircard or a MiFi), and charge you a healthy premium for the privilege. In some cases you can fly under the radar, like with a jailbroken iPhone on AT&T.

      My Touch Pro 2 on Sprint came with an "Internet Sharing" app in the programs menu, for sharing 3g over USB or Bluetooth..

  13. iTouch! by sznupi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The other way around is much more interesting - get iPod Touch and, if needed, connect via WiFi and this SIM card; placed in a mobile phone that is, well, primarily a good phone. Cheap. One of those with uberlong battery life.

    On a sensibly priced contract or outright prepaid (I can get 4 GiB, valid for 3 months (and if recharged again before that 3 month cut-off, usnused data are added to new portion), for 12 Euro; good enough)

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:iTouch! by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see that. I'm actually surprised no one's done something similar in hardware - while I carry a blackberry for work, I'd love to use its data connection on my Touch. Can't because the wifi radio in the bberry isn't built that way, but why not do something like that via bluetooth?

      I'd be surprised if people didn't want to do something similar once the Pad came out - why pay for 2 data plans?

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    2. Re:iTouch! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      "why not do something like that via bluetooth" - because Apple won't allow it (iTouch does have bluetooth...)

      And there is a possibility via WiFi already - a software for some smartphones that allows them to act as a WiFi hotspot; Joikuspot for Symbian for example. But it's not very attractive IMHO - not only your particular Symbian phone needs to have WiFi, but also there's unnecessary overlap of functionalities between iTouch and Symbian smartphone. It would be much more lean if data access was provided via something like, say, Nokia 1208 even (a phone with ridiculously great reception and battery life; which I would probably carry with iPhone anyway)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:iTouch! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      PS. Not saying that 1208 would be a good choice, that phone doesn't even have GPRS ;p

      But you get the idea; you can go really cheap if you just want a good phone with data access (they are way below $100 now; price without contract of course)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:iTouch! by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      And there is a possibility via WiFi already - a software for some smartphones that allows them to act as a WiFi hotspot

      I've been using WMWifiRouter (for Windows Mobile) for years, works great for this.. even supports WPA.

  14. SIM=GSM by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >What if, rather than buying a MiFi or using a Wi-Fi router app like those on the Palm Pre Plus, you could stick a SIM in any device

    But you *can't* stick a SIM in "any" device, only in GSM devices. Won't work on two of the three largest carriers in the USA, Verizon and Sprint. To make matters worse, Verizon will still charge a fortune to do that, and Sprint dropped the ability to legitimately tether smart phones completely (although you can do it with the Pre quite easily, anyway, but it is not legit. Maybe Sprint will wise up and offer something official this year?)

    And even if you had a GSM phone, it still has to be compatible, AND fit, AND drivers/software were available for that particular phone, AND the carrier had to somehow work with it.

    1. Re:SIM=GSM by sznupi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, Sagem and Telefonica certainly aren't concerned primarily about limitations of US cellphone market. Telefonica cares mostly about their network technology, which is quite firmly in GSM family. As is 80+% of mobile subsribers in the world.

      I don't expect any drivers to be neccessary; this solution seems to be precisely about NOT using "special" phone. SIM cards typically expose to a phone their customized menu item, so there's certainly a way to control any functionality added in the hardware of said card.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:SIM=GSM by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Right. Not to mention, whats the speed of SIM reads and writes? From my experience theyre unusually slow, like 14.4kbps slow. Its an ID card, not a fast storage option. A lot of good thats going to do you when that internet connection is a 1mbps.

  15. I'm not so sure about that. by jwietelmann · · Score: 1

    Consider how much you have to pay for data when you go beyond a typical 5GB/month limit. I would guess that your wireless provider would be more than happy to enable you to quickly burn through that 5GB and start paying the exorbitant overage costs.

  16. Ah crap by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It has a HUGE impact. Now, when you go to a tech convention, instead of having crappy wireless at the convention center, you will have 5000 people, all carrying their own access points, trying to use the same dozen channels! Horray!

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  17. Sup Dawg, by swanzilla · · Score: 1

    I herd you like wireless connections...

  18. What is the price $1 per meg? and $5 per meg outsi by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    What is the price $1 per meg? and $5 per meg outside of the usa? mexico and canada $2 per meg?

  19. PDAnet by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    Already does this using the hardware in the phone. I use it on my iPhone. It's also available for Android, Palm, Blackberries and Winmo.

    (can also use USB for tethering, works better than Apple's own)

    http://www.junefabrics.com/index.php

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  20. Except on Verizon by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

    They'll cripple the feature. AT&T will complain if you use it.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

    1. Re:Except on Verizon by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      I was actually thinking that if they can make it work, we won't be able to opt out. After all, most providers don't offer unlimited data - so if you go out and can't help it when strangers hop onto your AP and surf the net through your phone, racking up data charges? It's just money in the carriers' pockets.

  21. One thing is for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This company will make bank on this product if it works as advertised.

  22. A repeat of the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is very silly. Before people forgot about PDAs we had CF, SDIO, and SpringBoard. We don't need any new technology for small device expansion, instead of re-inventing it, we just need SDIO slots on phones. It is like we went backwards with technology.

  23. Did I miss something? by torkus · · Score: 1

    Ignoring the technical challenges of getting a WiFi transceiver into something the size of a SIM card - how exactly is the SIM card trading data with the cell phone to begin with?

    Cell phones have an open back door to their wireless data channel through the SIM interface? One that will, without software on the phone, just allow you to transport data?

    Even if you CAN talk through the SIM card interface and for data around how ever you want - how fast is that interface? It's meant to read off SIM cards that hold a tiny amount of data. So little most internet speeds could transmit the entire contents in a single second quite easily. Or is the SIM card supposed to have some kind of BT transceiver in it as well to tie to the cell phone?

    There's no detail in the linked article and...given that cell carriers lock down this stuff in the phone I fail to see how it's possible even if the miniaturization is practical.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  24. At least they didn't call it OrgaSIM ;-) by D4C5CE · · Score: 1

    Sagem Orga and Telefonica are promising: they've developed the SIMFi

    SCNR...

  25. I'm *very* skeptical by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
    because the signals that go between a phone and a SIM don't have ANYTHING to do with the signals needed to pass data between cellular and anything else. The connection to the SIM is a very low bandwidth connection, only a few kilobits per second, because all it does is store the subscriber idenity (IMSI), PIN, and phone book. When the phone is doing EDGE, 3G, or other high bandwidth data services, none of that data normally goes anywhere near the SIM.

    It might be possible to engineer something like this that would have higher bandwidth to the phone, but only by also specially engineering the phone. It's not something that could work with existing phones that are designed for normal SIM cards.

    As cool as it would be if this were real, I don't see how it can be. Seems like a marketing idea, not an engineered product.

  26. Re:What is the price $1 per meg? and $5 per meg ou by steeviant · · Score: 1

    What the fuck are you talking about? This device is designed by a european telco for people in europe to tether wirelessly using a sim card and wifi.

    Why would you think data is more expensive the further you get from the world's greediest bastards? If anything the opposite is true.

  27. Awkward Location for WiFi module... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, why not just build WiFi app's (eg, for the many handsets already equipped with WiFi),
    based on eg, Skype-protocol (we can pay ~$6 / mon for Skype-to-Skype calls, but cannot
    now dial to actual phone numbers (eg, using SkypeOut credit and/or Skype subscriptions).

    Why not a WiFi app. for Nokia, etc. that can reach one's choice of Asterisk server, eg, at
    home or in the office?

    Who wants to plug-in nano-connectors & risk breaking nano-coaxial cables, that lead out
    to an external WiFi antenna?!?

    And - if the antenna is internal, who'd want YAA = Yet Another Antenna pumping out WiFi
    from a new location in the handset?!? (It or heat that it generate might interfere with exist-
    ing circuitry, inside the handset, and/or add to the dose one's skin or brain is getting...)

    Let's re-think this one, eh? :-)

  28. I'm wondering Utopian economics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Well, someone would be charged by an ISP for a connection to the internet, but you don't necessarily need the internet. It's easy to imagine a free mesh network running over nodes like this, with everyone running as a repeater for the common good. Various local services (bus schedules, local maps, restaurant locations, ordering a cab or a pizza) could be made available by servers connected to the mesh network without anyone paying for an internet connection."

    Common good and commercialism in the same sentence, beautiful. Throw in free servers and electricity for the win.

  29. It's not 1920 anymore! by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 1

    It's not 1920 anymore. There are 2.4 Ghz antennas that are the same size as a grain of Basmati rice.

    Example: 2.2mm x 6.5mm 2.4GHz Ceramic Chip Antenna

    --
    "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
    1. Re:It's not 1920 anymore! by molo · · Score: 1

      Wow, that is impressive. Thanks for the link.

      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
  30. Good luck with that. by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Usually SIM card is placed in a socket with metal shield or clip, with circuit board and a keyboard on one side (keyboard mostly consisting of two layers of conductive film) and a battery on the other side (containing metal electrodes and cell casings).

    With shielding like that, good luck getting any signal in or out, unless this thing has a separate connector for an antenna outside the card (and good luck getting support for that from phone manufacturers and carriers).

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.