Slashdot Mirror


Porsche Unveils 911 Hybrid With Flywheel Booster

MikeChino writes "Porsche has just unveiled its 911 GT3 R Hybrid, a 480 horsepower track vehicle ready to rock the 24-hour Nurburgring race this May. Porsche's latest supercar will use the same 911 production platform available to consumers today, with a few race-ready features including front-wheel hybrid drive and an innovative flywheel system that stores kinetic energy from braking and then uses it to provide a 160 horsepower burst of speed. The setup is sure to offer an advantage when powering out of turns and passing by other racers."

197 comments

  1. I want 2!!!! by jkinney3 · · Score: 0

    Flywheel drive is SciFi cool!!

    1. Re:I want 2!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    2. Re:I want 2!!!! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      As a fan of the Stainless Steel Rat I want to see flywheel powered motorbikes.

    3. Re:I want 2!!!! by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      BMW made them over 50 years ago; I'm told they had "interesting" handling.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    4. Re:I want 2!!!! by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

      Due to the gyroscopic effects of the flywheel?

      --
      Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    5. Re:I want 2!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They invented the emergency phone number?

    6. Re:I want 2!!!! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      In the book you could leave them standing up without a stand.

    7. Re:I want 2!!!! by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

      The Bible talks about flywheels?

      --
      Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    8. Re:I want 2!!!! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Not that book.

    9. Re:I want 2!!!! by vivian · · Score: 1

      No because they were shaft driven. "Everyone knows" you cant wheelie a BMW - because they use a shaft instead of a chain :p

    10. Re:I want 2!!!! by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

      I have never owned a motorcycle so I have no idea what you mean. Why would a shaft drive bike not be able to pop a wheelie?

      --
      Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    11. Re:I want 2!!!! by vivian · · Score: 1

      Oh it's an old "vi vs emacs" type argument in the motorcycle world. Shaft driven bike riders spout how they are so much easier to maintain, because there is no chain you have to lube on a regular basis. Chain driven bike riders generaly retort something about not being able to wheelie a shaft driven bike - because they aren't quite as efficient (there are more drive losses going through a shaft vs a chain) but mostly because the shaft is spinning in line with the bike, it's moment of inertia supposedly stops you being able to wheelie it, or makes it tilt sideways if you do. BMW bikes are nearly all shaft driven.

    12. Re:I want 2!!!! by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you can use the enormous torque of ["ac"]||["de"]+"celerating" a pair of counterrotating flywheels to give the car out-of-this-world handling, and use the gyroscopic effect to make active suspension pointless. It's probably a good idea to get rid of the ICE and put a decent NiLi battery. To top it off, you remember Toyota Hybrid Synergy Drive? Two electric motors attached to a planetary gear reducer? Now, remember that there are two self-synchronous motor geometries. One with an enclosing (around the coils) rotor, and one with the rotor within the coils. Well, why not make an engine with two rotors? Like two engines in one, with shared components, making it much lighter.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  2. A little more info (but not much) by flewp · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://joesaward.wordpress.com/2010/02/11/a-rumour-explained/ As this post's title says, it doesn't give much more info. Essentially it just adds the information that the flywheel system is derived from the Williams F1 Team's KERS (kinetic energy recovery system).

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    1. Re:A little more info (but not much) by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      http://joesaward.wordpress.com/2010/02/11/a-rumour-explained/ As this post's title says, it doesn't give much more info. Essentially it just adds the information that the flywheel system is derived from the Williams F1 Team's KERS (kinetic energy recovery system).

      Cool. I saw flywheel and immediately thought KERS but didn't know what F1 team would give Porsche anything.

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    2. Re:A little more info (but not much) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ones that need money.

      IE: ALL of them.

    3. Re:A little more info (but not much) by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Informative

      A rule change in the F1 league requires Kenetic Energy Recovery Systems (KERS) systems for all F1 cars in 2010 and is pretty much the main driver behind the technology. LeMans is also requiring hybrid systems, though they've banned anything with a flywheel. Williams developed the only flywheel KERS and AFAIK is the only team which developed any system in-house & without a partner in the auto industry.

      Here's some better info explaining the technology:
      http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/11/videos-porsche-911-gt3-r-hybrid-uses-williams-f1-flywheel-kers/

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:A little more info (but not much) by hibiki_r · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except Ferrari and Mercedes of course: Neither of them is short of money, and aren't all that interested in passing their tech to the competition.

      They could get an updated KERS without talking to the F1 teams themselves though: Magneti Marelli developed KERS systems for at least 3 teams last year.

    5. Re:A little more info (but not much) by flewp · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uh, no. No team is running KERS in 2010. KERS is not banned in 2010 (regulations still allow it, but it is neither banned, nor required), but the FOTA (Formula One Teams Association) teams have agreed to not use KERS in 2010. All of the teams so far are members of FOTA, which means unless one of them breaks ranks, we won't see KERS on the grid in 2010.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    6. Re:A little more info (but not much) by kimvette · · Score: 1

      LeMans is also requiring hybrid systems, though they've banned anything with a flywheel.

      So, this means no manual transmissions?

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    7. Re:A little more info (but not much) by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      LeMans is also requiring hybrid systems, though they've banned anything with a flywheel.

      So, this means no manual transmissions?

      And no compression, come to think of it.

    8. Re:A little more info (but not much) by Xiph1980 · · Score: 1

      kimvette, you can have a direct-drive hybrid where the powerhouse (typically internal combustion engine) is physically connected to the wheels, but with an electromotor connected to the drivetrain that assists when driving slowly, and charges the batteries when breaking, so that would still give you the option of having a manual transmission system in place.

      MichaelSmith, there is absolutely no reason to leave out (or include for that matter) a compressor in a hybrid car. Infact, most engines have a higher efficiency with some compression added. If you have a disconnected engine (where all the engine does is to charge the batteries without physical connection to the drivetrain) you want an engine that has the highest efficiency possible (for personal use, that would typically be "supplied energy" / "fuel energy density", but for racing the weight of the engine is probably more important). That could very well be a specific engine that performs optimal with a compressor at a very thin RPM range.

      --
      Manuals are your last resort only
  3. Gyroscopic effect? by nicknamenotavailable · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Flywheels have been used to store energy for ages, but do they change the handling of the car at all?
    Boats can have gyroscopic roll stabilizers, but what effect does this flywheel have?

    1. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      If I understand gyroscopes right, if its rotating flat like a top it will keep the car from rolling as much through the corners. This can cause the outside wheels to have more loading and reduce handling... I think.

    2. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      I was wondering this, too. I think they could negate it with gimbals, though.

      What would be really interesting is if they could figure out a way to use the flywheel + gimbals selectively in some sort of anti-roll/traction control/etc, when necessary. IANAMechE, though, maybe someone with a deeper background could hypothesize further :)

    3. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about a horizontal top scheme, but one spinning on edge will definitely have an effect on handling as a driver turns around a chicane. I can see how this would end very badly on a wet track.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by DieByWire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...but do they change the handling of the car at all?

      Counter-rotating flywheels (and/or orienting the flywheel axis vertically) would probably minimize the precession effects. Weight distribution and complexity are probably larger factors.

      --
      Never shake hands with a man you meet in a fertility clinic.
    5. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by jnnnnn · · Score: 1

      If the flywheel is horizontal, it will strongly resist roll (where a car's weight moves to the outer wheels on a corner), and may improve handling significantly.

      If the flywheel is vertical (very unlikely), the car will resist turning and have very poor handling.

      Conservation of angular momentum is the same force that makes bikes easy to balance (slow to fall over) when they're moving.

      With a spinning wheel, rotating the axis (axle) towards the plane of the wheel is hard, but rotating around the axis offers no resistance.

      More reading.

    6. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by PiAndWhippedCream · · Score: 0

      The problem with gimbals is that you need 4 of them, and energy extraction is somewhat dificult.

      Another solution is to use two flywheels that rotate in oppisite directions on the same shaft. This might be more able to produce the anti-roll effect you're looking for, energy could be transfered between the wheels to provide whatever angular force was necessary.

      I am also not a MechE.

    7. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Dahamma · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I found another link with more info (and some interesting comments):

      http://www.greencarcongress.com/2010/02/gt3r-20100211.html

      It looks like the flywheel itself has an integrated magnet, so it's basically a generator. Clever, and means it doesn't need a mechanical connection, so gimbals would work.

      Though it also looks like it does not in fact use gimbals... may just use some sort of spring suspension?

    8. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No worse than letting your foot off the gas a little in the corner with a rear-engine rear wheel drive car...

      Not done it in a 911 of any vintage, but in a 356 it gets kinda interesting for a few seconds ...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    9. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by scotch · · Score: 1

      Angular momentum is not the primary cause of why bicycles are easy to balance when moving. It's more about dynamic stability, you lean left, the front wheel moves in a way to shift the center of gravity back over both wheels' contact points. Some guy did an experiment to negate the angular momentum of the wheels to prove it.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    10. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No worse than a vehicle with a gyroscopic tendency? I seriously doubt that. I know the flywheel at the crank and all four wheels also exhibit this effect. But the idea of something storing enough energy to provide an extra 160HP on tap??!! I'd imagine it causing some serious gyroscopic forces.

      OTHO, this is Porsche putting their own reputation on the line. We'll see...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    11. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Flywheels have been used to store energy for ages, but do they change the handling of the car at all?
      Boats can have gyroscopic roll stabilizers, but what effect does this flywheel have?

      Well, if the axis is vertical, the car would turn just fine. It wouldn't want to flip over, but i think that's alright with most people involved.

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    12. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by PiAndWhippedCream · · Score: 0

      It looks like the flywheel itself has an integrated magnet, so it's basically a generator.

      In that case, it is an inductor. A really really big inductor, that happens to store it's energy mechanicly.

      The implication is that energy storage is determined by the product of the angular and magnetic moment, so it can store more energy at a given angular momentum than a purely mechanical flywheel. So perhaps the torsional effect is kept low enough that it doesn't affect handling.

    13. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by ceiling9 · · Score: 1

      A mass with angular momentum experiences a moment in a direction perpendicular to both the angular momentum, and the rate of change of the angular momentum. I'm not sure if I stated that correctly, I may be off, but what it means is that if the flywheel is mounted horizontally (the angular momentum vector pointed straight up or down) then when the car rolls, it will generate a pitching moment, and when the car pitches, it will generate a rolling moment. I don't know if it would be likely that the car would experience high enough pitch or roll rates for this to be a factor. A stabilizer could rotate the flywheel internally in the car pitch axis to generate a rolling moment when going around corners.

    14. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by hardburn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yup, he attached a wheel to the front that counter-rotates with the main front wheel. The bike was still perfectly ridable.

      A peddle bike rolled along by itself might have enough angular momentum from the wheels to keep it steady as long as it's moving, but with a rider, the amount of weight far exceeds gyroscopic effects.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    15. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      In that case, it is an inductor. A really really big inductor, that happens to store it's energy mechanicly.

      It's an interesting idea, but an inductor is defined as a device that stores energy magnetically... storing energy mechanically is what makes it a flywheel ;)

      The flywheel is in fact one half of a generator - which takes mechanical energy and converts it to electrical energy via electromagnetic induction (and is a motor in reverse, with the work going towards spinning the flywheel).

    16. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Ihmhi · · Score: 3, Funny

      what effect does this flywheel have?

      Blue sparks shoot out of the wheels, and then you can get ahead of your competitors and shoot a green shell backwards at them.

    17. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by PiAndWhippedCream · · Score: 0

      Yes, and a motor is an inductor. You can measure the size of the flywheel in Henries, I've done it before, obviously not with this particular product ...

      The reason it's useful to think of it as an inductor is because it is a spinning magnet; some of its energy storage potential will come from the spinning mass, but some of it will also come from the spinning magnet. The energy that is stored because the flywheel is creating a magnetic field that changes with time should be thought of as arising from inductance, as it arises in an undeniably ``inductive'' way.

    18. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Necroloth · · Score: 2, Informative

      The flywheel rotates at incredible speeds, tip speeds are at couple of Mach... but it's cased in balistic grade material which will protect everyone should it decide to fall apart.

    19. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd assume that Porsche's engineers have thought of all of these issue which are obvious to armchair knowitalls. I'd also assume that the fact that they're announcing an implementation suggests that they've solved these issues.

    20. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by thsths · · Score: 0

      No people with understanding of physics around, hm? Of course you use to counter-rotating flywheels to cancel the gyroscopic effects.

      The real problem is in the bearings: they still have to deal with the forces, and the general concern is that they wear out faster than anything else on the care.

    21. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Quantumstate · · Score: 1

      Even a bike by itself won't stay up at a speed which you can push it at. I saw a guy give a demonstration at a talk about gyroscopic effects.

    22. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by kf6auf · · Score: 2, Informative

      It depends on the orientation of the axis of the flywheel. If you try to place the flywheel so that the axis is horizontal, you'll end up with needing to apply a lot of torque in order to turn the vehicle left-right, making it harder to turn. If you place the flywheel so that the axis is vertical, the amount of torque necessary to flip the vehicle would go up, probably making this a safety feature for SUVs, and would have very little effect on the torque needed to turn the vehicle left-right.

      The rule with (single-axis) gyroscopes is that the only axis it isn't harder to rotate the whole gyroscope around is the one around which it's already spinning; any non-parallel axis is harder.

    23. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by chocapix · · Score: 1

      I'd assume that Porsche's engineers have thought of all of these issue which are obvious to armchair knowitalls. I'd also assume that the fact that they're announcing an implementation suggests that they've solved these issues.

      True, but people are still interested in how they solved the issues. The way I see it, saying '$SUCCESFULCOMPANY is doing something stupid, because $REASONIVEJUSTHOUGHTOF' is just a way to start a discussion and get some insight.

    24. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      Ah, no, a flywheel is analogous to a capacitor, where applied force (current) is stored as RPM (voltage). A mechanical inductor would be more like a spring, storing energy as pressure and releasing it over a distance.

    25. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Maybe the gyroscope is free to rotate within the car.

    26. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I have been cycling for 40 years and I have absolutely no idea how it is done.

    27. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a 40 000 rpm flywheel rotating at full speed when entering a corner would have some effect, but then it's not the point: the point is out of a turn to "empty" your flywheel by getting it's stored energy back to accelerate, so that when you enter the next corner the flywheel is not rotating anymore (so it hardly has any effect besides the weight) and then you brake and it starts rotating again. But, yup, I wonder too how it "feels". It sure would feel different than my road-legal 911 :)

    28. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by PiAndWhippedCream · · Score: 0

      Only if you choose to entirely ignore the effects of the rotational refrence frame. When you compare voltage to RPM you are silently multiplying by the demsionless unit radians.

      More percisely, a flywheel stores power delivered to it torsionally, a spring (I assume you were talking about a linear spring) stores force applied to it in a constant direction (work) as energy.

      Linear force ought to be thought of as DC, and torsional force, AC. An ideal capacitor will store energy (much like a Hookian spring) when a constant voltage DC (force) is applied to it. An inductor will store energy in the presesence of an AC source. (It is, of course, much more complicated then that, there are edge cases in which the difference between AC and DC is dificult to discern, such as wires long enough for the speed of electrical impulse to become meaningful, cases of magnetic resonance(ie transformers) etc.)

      Flywheels look like capacitors, look like springs, look like inductors etc. because the nature of force and energy is reletavely constant. However when one uses vectors rather than scalers, it becomes clear that capacitors are springs, but not flywheels, and that inductors are flywheels, and not springs.

    29. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by cynyr · · Score: 1

      So it would assist the sway bars then. Usually they pull the inside wheel up a bit to keep the car flatter though the turn. From the pictures at the link in http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1548596&cid=31123502 it is a top like system, but rather small and i can only assume very very high speed. This seems to be linked electricly to the front wheels only(odd not seeing 4wd after all the rally) The same sort of system would work with ultra capacitors but from what i understand those are not allowed at LeMans. I would think that this would also help keep the car from nosing into breaking as much, and may pose a problem for those undulations that always seem to catch the prototypes out.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    30. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      If the gyro is locked down, which the Williams unit appears to be, it will counter any roll and pitch in the car while having little or no effect on yaw, perhaps it might introduce a perceptible precession during roll or pitch. I'd think for a competent race driver, acclimatization to the system would be fairly quick, it's effects are the same as most chassis designers try to replicate mechanically anyways. Also because the gyro is countering chassis force, that thing better have some hellacious bearings in it for rolling courses. Seems like a gimbaled gyro would have no effect.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    31. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't want to tilt up/down to go up or down slopes either.

      Which might not be so alright.

      Lots of roads also have banked corners.

      --
    32. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      I can see how this would end very badly on a wet track.

      Well, I'm pretty sure Porsche hasn't tested this at all... Nor have they asked Williams how their F1 cars handled in rain. [/sarcasm]

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    33. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

      Quite correct. As is your point about the bearings. And possible structural issues, as the mounting for the two flywheels experiences those forces even if everything outside the two-flywheel "system" does not.

      Yet my comment above remains modded at two points, while a reply saying "Two counter rotating flywheels will NOT cancel out each other!... the reaction forces are canceled out. However the combination still resist rotating along any axis other then it's axis of rotation" is currently modded "4, insightful."

    34. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See the video on this page. A bike very much can stay up on its own with a good push. Maybe not from gyroscopic forces alone (which might be what you're getting at), but it can stay up as long as it has speed.

    35. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      You can't negate angular momentum, that's absurd. A counter-rotating disc will cancel out the reactionary torque (leaning to the left turns the wheel to the left) which will make it exceedingly difficult to steer, but the restoring torque will still be there.

    36. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by scotch · · Score: 1

      You can negate angular momentum, it's a vector quantity. How about a ski bike? Still stable while moving.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    37. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by inKubus · · Score: 1

      These aren't new, the idea has been around for at least 60 years. Materials science has recently evolved to a point where the 20-50-100K rpm flywheels are possible without exploding. I have seen bigger slower ones that connect to utility lines to buffer power spikes and sags and such.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    38. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      You mean a Skibob? They have to have skis on their feet to not fall off.

    39. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      I don't see how you come up with that analogy at all.

      The amount of energy stored in an inductor or capacitor is a scalar quantity.

      In a capacitor, the energy is proportional to the capacitance times the applied voltage. In an inductor, it's the inductance times the current. Nothing vectorial about it.

      AC versus DC has nothing to do with it. A capacitor and inductor respond to AC in equivalent but opposite ways.

    40. Re:Gyroscopic effect? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Magnetic bearings.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  4. Will Porsche succeed where KERS failed? by psperl · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is very similiar to the KERS (Kinetic Energy Recovery System) that was used by some F1 teams last year such as McLaren and Ferrari. The system failed because the gains weren't enough to offset weight and bulk of the system. All F1 cars weigh 600kg, but the cars themselves are actually much lighter and need to be ballasted to reach this weight. The distribution of this ballast is very important, as keeping the center of gravity low on a race car is critical. Cars with KERS has a higher center of gravity than other cars because the KERS systems couldn't be placed as low as ballast. Add to that the loss of development time on other areas of the car, and the result is that all of the teams with KERS performed very poorly. This Porsche could make a hybrid system work, as it has more design flexibility and a longer race. Fuel savings will be exxagerated by the extreme length of the race, which is 12 times longer than the maximum time allowed for an F1 race.

    1. Re:Will Porsche succeed where KERS failed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with the KERS system is not entirely on the weight, but because of the rules. They could only use it for 7 or so seconds per lap as stipulated by the rules, since they don't want the KERS cars to outrun the normal cars without even putting up a fight.

    2. Re:Will Porsche succeed where KERS failed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The system didn't fail, it was pulled because ONLY McLaren and Ferrari could afford it. Several races had positions decided simply because of their KERS power. Of course they realized if they all had it, there would be no gain...

    3. Re:Will Porsche succeed where KERS failed? by tangent3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The KERS cars performed poorly at the start of the season, but started catching up during the middle of the season, with McLaren having the fastest car at the end of the season. The double diffuser controversy also had a big hand in holding back the KERS cars at the start of the season.

    4. Re:Will Porsche succeed where KERS failed? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Could happen. After all, they've saved-up countless millions of engineering hours by not having to pay designers to re-think the shape, configuration and style of the original Beetle.

      The 911 is some serious evolution of "The People's Car". I'll not Godwinize myself here.

    5. Re:Will Porsche succeed where KERS failed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It wasn't a problem with the KERS itself, but the rules/restrictions placed on them. I'd imagine that once you have the system in the car, turning it up to higher levels of storage and output would add very little new bulk. Since they weren't required, they wanted KERS cars and non-KERS cars to be equal in performance. If you should, in theory, have very similar (or even a little better) lap times and less new gadgets to break, why bother spending the time and money to work on it?

    6. Re:Will Porsche succeed where KERS failed? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      I presume that there will be some restrictions in the use of such systems in sports car racing also.

    7. Re:Will Porsche succeed where KERS failed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The flywheel doesn't need to be in the VERTICAL plane...

      Everyone is talking about gyroscopic forces, and high center of gravity, but if the flywheel is in the horizontal plane, then it can be at or below the bottom of the chassis and contribute no gyroscope forces upon turning. This might even help LOWER the center of gravity

      Of course there would still be torque reactions upon braking/accelerating from the acceleration of the flywheel, but I would contend that these are probably quite a bit less than gyroscopic forces.

  5. awful typo in article by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 5, Funny

    From TFA: "This generator stores energy each time the vehicle breaks..."

    If I had a Porsche 911 I wouldn't want to damage the thing to use the hybrid feature. Do they perhaps mean "brakes"?

    1. Re:awful typo in article by turing_m · · Score: 5, Funny

      From TFA: "This generator stores energy each time the vehicle breaks..."

      Just think of what this technology could do in the hands of Ford!

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    2. Re:awful typo in article by Crazyswedishguy · · Score: 0

      Just think of what this technology could do in the hands of Ford!

      BRILLIANT! All Ford has to do is reverse the polarity.
      That is, take the Pinto, and reverse its system so that it stores the energy, instead of releasing it (from the gasoline tank), every time it breaks.
      To put it in Slashdot terms:

      1. Take Pinto
      2. Reverse polarity
      3. ?
      4. Profit

      (admittedly, the "?" should really be next to the "reverse polarity"...)

      Btw, we need more car analogies.

      --
      This space up for sale.
    3. Re:awful typo in article by pmontra · · Score: 1

      That was a case of braken English :-)

    4. Re:awful typo in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Toyota

  6. Cospinicay! by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1, Funny

    PORSCHE DID 911!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  7. Porsche... by Brad1138 · · Score: 1
    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Porsche... by bwnunnally · · Score: 1

      Another line from this clip applicable to the article: "Have you always been this quick, or is this something new?"

      --
      --- bruce CaddyInfo.com: Cadillac Automotive Information
    2. Re:Porsche... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish movies would stop insulting people's intelligence. As if a boat like Guido was driving could keep up with the Porsche for, say, 2 seconds. Yet it manages to be on their tail for minutes, with its boat like suspension wobblying all over the place, all the while putting down less than 200HP and probably outweighting the Porsche 2:1. Stupid. It would have been left for dead right at the stop light, and a country mile behind all those narrow back alley twists and turns.

    3. Re:Porsche... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you kidding? Porsches are only fast in a straight line, or on roads with a lot of big wide corners. Find a road that's less than glassy-smooth and you're not going to go above about 50mph before the car becomes unmanageable because the suspension is too stiff and doesn't have any travel.

    4. Re:Porsche... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Nice one, for a minute there I couldn't tell you were actually being sarcastic.

    5. Re:Porsche... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? Porsches include Yaw control now, so that when you drive an ass-heavy car on a bumpy road it can apply the brakes automatically to prevent it from swapping ends.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Porsche... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I did wonder if they had all the weight of the extra flywheel aft of the rear axle - I bet that would make it entertaining on wet twisty roads.

      For those that don't believe that Porsches don't handle - when was the last time you saw an early-80s Turbo that *hadn't* had the rear end rebuilt? What do you suppose physics does with a car where there's hardly any weight over the front axle, and a great big heavy engine and gearbox *behind* the rear axle? Hint - try an experiment. Get a dart, and throw it feathers-first at the dartboard. What does the dart try to do? Which end hits the dartboard?

    7. Re:Porsche... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There's a Porsche that handles, it's the 928 :D (I leave the humor as an exercise to the reader.) And even that has a super-wacky rear suspension to get handling. I just want to see Subaru make an Impreza with about 51% front weight, it would be the bomb.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. can a burst of speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be measured in horsepower? From article summary "uses it to provide a 160 horsepower burst of speed."

    1. Re:can a burst of speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but Americans are too stupid to understand torque.

  9. sounds familiar by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hybrid-drivetrain racecar with a flywheel sounds a lot like this 1994 car.

    1. Re:sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about those flywheels, but I'm totally quitting my job to be a locksmith!

    2. Re:sounds familiar by somepunk · · Score: 1

      Or this one from about the same time. They were trying to develop a consumer version. When they gave up, it was due to a lack of interest (the heyday of SUVs!), not technical problems, from everything I've read.

      --
      Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. (Isaac Asimov)
    3. Re:sounds familiar by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Hmm, doesn't sound like it at all to me...

      That car was a gas turbine engine powering a an electric motor with the flywheel assisting the same motor. This one is a traditional Porsche flat 6 driving the rear wheels with a braking-powered flywheel occasionally driving the front. All cars have flywheels, that doesn't mean all cars are alike.

  10. Wow, they incorporated technology... by infernalC · · Score: 0

    from lawnmower engines!

    Actually, I'm glad to see car companies reclaiming all that kinetic energy that they were previously just radiating off as heat during braking.

    I bet a flywheel is an incredibly efficient way to store it, too. Now, lets see if these brakes actually work. Hope they did a better job than Toyota.

    1. Re:Wow, they incorporated technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're talking about a different flywheel you twit. All internal combustion engines including the one in your car (duh) have a flywheel on the main shaft. If they didn't then when you let the clutch out then there wouldn't be enough kinetic energy in the engine to compress the next cylinder and it would stall. You have a flywheel (for instance, a giant disc that your clutch will engage) to smooth out the RPMs and add some mass to the system.

      What they're talking about is a giant flywheel that they spin up to store kinetic energy. Like a giant mechanical capacitor. Like something which, if you crashed and it was damaged while it was charged up it would make a very impressive shrapnel cloud.

  11. What they don't tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The flywheel's attached to the crankshaft...

  12. Re:911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call a bwaaaahmbulance! It hasn't even been ten years!

  13. Idiocracy by CmdrChaos · · Score: 1

    This sounds and looks like something out of idiocracy. To bad it doesn't have monster tires

  14. I foresee... by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

    ...a fun time for Jeremy Clarkson, Richard Hammond, and James May. :-)

    --

    "Bah!" - Dogbert
  15. Front wheel drive? by markdavis · · Score: 1

    In a race car???

    1. Re:Front wheel drive? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Reply to self...

      The wording of the summary (or first article) is not ideal. It is not a front wheel drive car (which would be silly). It is a mostly rear-wheel drive car with a sometimes front drive supplemental. Here is some additional interesting info from http://www.manualgear.com/en/in_brief-367-911+GT3+R+Hybrid+Celebrates+World+Debut+in+Geneva.html

      "The flywheel generator is charged whenever the driver applies the brakes, with the two electric motors reversing their function on the front axle and acting themselves as generators. Then, whenever necessary, that is when accelerating out of a bend or when overtaking, the driver is able to call up extra energy from the charged flywheel generator, the flywheel being slowed down electromagnetically in the generator mode and thus supplying up to 120 kW to the two electric motors at the front from its kinetic energy."

    2. Re:Front wheel drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the wording was bloody obvious.

      Of course a 911 is going to have rear wheel drive, as that's the entire point of the basic rear heavy design the 911s have used for decades. That's what they are.

      But also, there are front wheel drive sports cars. J-WRC is a good example.

    3. Re:Front wheel drive? by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 0

      Shh, next you'll be claiming people actually change gears themselves.

      And every American knows - that's just insane.

    4. Re:Front wheel drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they don't even need to push the throttle.

  16. Porsche Hybrid by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 0

    Hybrids, being more complex vehicles than classic cars or pure electric vehicles don't handle as easily, and might not perform as well in fast or extreme conditions. Furthermore, they won't save a lot of gas when driving at constant and/or high speeds, such as highway or a race track.

    But they are really good in urban environment when you need to often slow down and speed up to accommodate heavy traffic, as then the brake mechanism kicks in saving energy and and the electric engines is used in those short runs/speedups that are so frequent in city driving conditions. It's perfect for taking the kids, going shopping, commute to work and back, you know things you always wanted to do with your Porsche 911.

    By the way, most of not all hybrids license technology from Toyota for their operation. Can't wait to see what faulty brakes or accidental acceleration on a Porsche 911 looks like.

    1. Re:Porsche Hybrid by jpmorgan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hope you realize that outside of NASCAR, most race driving is not constant high speed. It involves a great deal of braking and acceleration, when maneuvering through corners. This is why track cars have really, really good brakes, and being able to reclaim that kinetic energy lost is potentially an enormous benefit.

      They haven't been popular to date because of the impact on vehicle dynamics, but it's just a matter of time until the engineering issues are solved.

    2. Re:Porsche Hybrid by Nexus7 · · Score: 3, Informative

      > By the way, most of not all hybrids license technology from Toyota for their operation.
      > Can't wait to see what faulty brakes or accidental acceleration on a Porsche 911 looks like.

      Very unlike a Toyota, I think.

      Note: This is a flywheel hybrid, not a battery hybrid.

    3. Re:Porsche Hybrid by evanbd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Furthermore, they won't save a lot of gas when driving at constant and/or high speeds, such as highway or a race track.

      Clearly you missed part of the summary: this is not a NASCAR race.

    4. Re:Porsche Hybrid by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Shhhh ... don't tell him that. Watching a race that has more than four left turns and 0 right turns per lap requires more than 5 seconds worth of attention.

    5. Re:Porsche Hybrid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and I believe there are quite a lot of people driving 911s to work. The more normal street versions are intended to be useable for daily driving - though of course, they're not optimized for it. ;)

    6. Re:Porsche Hybrid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you don't have to use toyota's ECM to use hybrid tech.
      Im sure Porshe's ECM makes toyota's look like a pocket calculator in terms of sophistication

  17. safety ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ok, so we have lets say 100 kg flywheel rotating at 40,000 rpm.
    and we crash.
    something hits the flywheel, likely destroying bearings as well.
    what will happen ?

    I'm not sure, but I don't think this will end good.

    did you heard about lightened and not properly balanced engine flywheels ? I did. they could explode, and in cars with transverse engine layout shrapnels could even kill the driver.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSFA0ufNS_k

    1. Re:safety ? by FonzCam · · Score: 2, Informative

      The flywheel is a lot less then 100kg. The whole Williams Hybrid KERS system for F1 was around the 35kg mark so the actual flywheel will be a fraction of that. The flyweel and enclosure is all made of a carbon fiber composite and is made in such a way that if it comes loose it will shatter on impact.

  18. I get a chuckle from the cnn article on this topic, that states you could use the extra 160 hp when you needed to pass somebody (in case the standard 480 horses isn't enough)

    1. Re:Humor by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      I get a chuckle from the cnn article on this topic, that states you could use the extra 160 hp when you needed to pass somebody (in case the standard 480 horses isn't enough)

      Hah, that is funny, but I think they meant *in a race*. ;)
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    2. Re:Humor by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      The idea is that you only need a small 30hp or so generator to keep the flywheel spun up and provide enough power for highway cruise. Then the electric motor handles all your acceleration and breaking.

  19. What? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

    No mention of the awesome green-light burn-outs soon to be offered to the affluent consumer?

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:What? by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whenever I see somebody doing a burnout, I always feel bad for them because their poor tires are not properly matched to their car. After all, with a properly matched tire set, if you tromp the gas, the car goes fast. I love embarassing ignorant rednecks in their hopped up Camaros by beating them for the first couple of hundred yards in my all wheel drive GMC Safari minivan while they sit their and spin their wheels like idiots. They don't seem to realize that they can only beat me once their wheels stop spinning. They think that their inability to maintain traction is some sort of advantage.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:What? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, I'm with you completely on that. If it's really speed you want, then maintaining traction as much as possible is the way to get it. But burnouts are not really a display of speed, they're a show unto themselves.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:What? by OrangeCatholic · · Score: 1

      I believe it's an attempt to melt the rubber so you get better traction.

      Of course, you're supposed to do it *before* the flag goes down...

    4. Re:What? by zmaragdus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Small addendum: some cars have enough power to spin any set of tires when the driver stomps his foot down. One point of skill for people who own such cars is to be able to launch your car from a halt as fast as you can without spinning the tires.

      --
      (((dB)))
    5. Re:What? by zmaragdus · · Score: 1

      That works on drag racers (the kind that are dozens of feet long and have engines that put out thousands of horsepower, not simply people with average cars driving in a straight line). They spin their tires to both lay down rubber and to heat the tires. The average street racer gets no straight-line acceleration/speed benefit from spinning tires.

      --
      (((dB)))
    6. Re:What? by takev · · Score: 1

      Actually for at least a formula 1 car 20% slip during acceleration is optimal for acceleration, although not for tire wear. From the article below it says that traction control can set the amount of slip during acceleration as ideal as possible. Where ideal may be for either tire wear or acceleration depending on the circumstances of the race.

      http://www.atlasf1.com/2000/dec27/shoebotham.html

    7. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you don't have a clue.
      It has nothing to do with "proper matching" of tyres. If you have a powerful car you can get the stickiest street tyres available and still break traction. The reason some drivers don't is because they choose not to and have the launching skill to not to. Dumping the clutch at full revs will get any tyres smoking and happens to be a bit of fun, despite being slow.

  20. Top Gear by JoshWurzel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Richard Hammond is gonna have a field day with this. I can't wait to see it on TG next season.

  21. Counter-rotating flywheels would cancel it by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    If there's enough gyroscopic effect to matter, then the normal engineering way to deal with it would be to use a pair of flywheels rotating in opposite directions. Then, you can think of it either way, the gyroscopic effects cancel... or the net angular momentum of the two flywheels is zero so there is no gyroscopic effect.

    1. Re:Counter-rotating flywheels would cancel it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FAIL

    2. Re:Counter-rotating flywheels would cancel it by eelke_klein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two counter rotating flywheels will NOT cancel out each other! Only the reaction (precessional is the official term i think in english) forces are canceled out!

      Let's say the three axis are x, y and z. Then when you have a single flywheel which is rotating about the x axis it will resist rotating along the other axis and while react with a force that is perpedular to the the rotation and the force. When adding a second counter rotating flywheel it will cause a reaction force opposite to that of the first flywheel so the reaction forces are canceled out. However the combination still resist rotating along any axis other then it's axis of rotation.

    3. Re:Counter-rotating flywheels would cancel it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      While what you say is true, the only axis you want a car to rotate around easily is the one that involves turning the car. You want to minimize body pitch and roll as much as possible in almost all cases. The only exception that comes to mind is rock crawling, which is done at very low speeds anyway. So all you have to do is mount the counter-rotating flywheels with their axis pointing towards the sky, and the car's handling will be improved.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Counter-rotating flywheels would cancel it by eelke_klein · · Score: 1

      Indeed while you would like to minimize body pitch and roll as caused by forces like acceleration and going through corners it actually is important also for a car to be able to quickly follow the angle of the road. That is also one of the reasons most supercars have their engine in the center. Centering the majority of the mass at the center of the car will make it turn, roll and pitch easily!

      However there is another reason why you do not want the gyroscopic effect. To store enough energy in a flywheel that doesn't weight very much requires extremely high rotational speeds which means the gyroscopic effects will be very strong. Strong enough to put a high strain on the chassis and destroy the bearings of the flywheel in the process.

      I actually expect they are using counter rotating flywheels with a vertical axis. Suspended in a construction allowing (limited) free rotation on the other axis's and an electrical system to transfer the energy.

    5. Re:Counter-rotating flywheels would cancel it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That is also one of the reasons most supercars have their engine in the center. Centering the majority of the mass at the center of the car will make it turn, roll and pitch easily!

      Reducing rotational inertia is one reason, yes. But it pales in comparison to putting the driver where they can see the front of the car, and to balancing the vehicle to reduce pitch. Ideally the vehicle would not pitch very much at all. If you can put the flywheel in the center of the vehicle and the wheels out at the corners, the vehicle will still follow the road just fine.

      To store enough energy in a flywheel that doesn't weight very much requires extremely high rotational speeds which means the gyroscopic effects will be very strong. Strong enough to put a high strain on the chassis and destroy the bearings of the flywheel in the process.

      In racing it hardly matters, of course. Or on a Porsche with a $100k+ price tag. But you can get maglev bearings today; they could go into cars tomorrow. As for the strain on the chassis, that is trivial to design around compared to the other issues the designers face. It's not even close to the strain on the chassis from, say, the rear subframe in a RWD unibody auto.

      I actually expect they are using counter rotating flywheels with a vertical axis. Suspended in a construction allowing (limited) free rotation on the other axis's and an electrical system to transfer the energy.

      If you think not wearing out the main bearing is difficult, try handling your rotational system and its electrical connections at the same time you minimize its flopping around, to prevent the effect of having heavy loose luggage in your trunk. Either there are limits to its travel, which can be exceeded with potentially disastrous results if you're in a hard turn (let alone a drift) or there are no limits meaning it's fully gimballed, and then the electrical connections become a bear. Better to just float it on silicone-filled bushings (or squishy poly, and with dampers... the former is lighter) to avoid wearing out the bearings with minor vibration, and reduce the sway bar tension to compensate for the reduction in body roll. In anything with enough wheelbase to justify such a system, the effect on pitch should be negligible.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. Explanation of how it works by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

    Quoting from http://www.dailytech.com/Porsche+911+GT3+R+Hybrid+to+Debut+in+Geneva/article17666.htm

    The hybrid system in the GT3 R Hybrid uses a flywheel system that harnesses kinetic energy under braking to power a pair of electric motors mounted in a single assembly. The electric motors and flywheel assembly sit where the passenger seat of a street 911 would normally reside. Power gathered by the flywheel system is sent to the front wheels and when fully charged the hybrid system can provide a 6-8 second burst of power for passing and exiting corners activated by a button on the steering wheel. The flywheel in the hybrid system will reportedly spin as fast as 40,000 rpm.

    The pair of electric motors provides an additional 161 horsepower to the front wheels supplementing the 4.0-liter flat-6 that produces 480hp and sends its power to the rear wheels. Porsche is mum on performance claims for the 911 GT3 R Hybrid, but the car will appear on May 15 at the Nurburgring 24 Hours endurance race."

    So it's not too different from a normal hybrid, except instead of charging batteries to store the energy they are spinning up a flywheel. The forward kinetic energy of the vehicle is recovered as electrical power using generators/motors, which drives generator/motors that spin up a flywheel. Going the other way, the flywheel mechanical energy is converted back to electricity to drive the front wheel motors.

    1. Re:Explanation of how it works by LtGordon · · Score: 1

      I think the most interesting part of the story, and that which makes it /.-appropriate is that they're storing the energy mechanically instead of in a battery. I'd imagine the power levels this kind of system would require and charge/drain rates would wreak all kinds of havoc on a typical battery. Furthermore, it seems like a good call for a rapid (6-8 seconds) release of the stored power. It's a hybrid race car, not a commuter; the primary benefit is the speed boost (akin to using nitrous oxide), not the fuel economy.

    2. Re:Explanation of how it works by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      The very rapid store/release is probably the main benefit. Overall energy storage is probably pretty low. Doing the math, an 80-hp output for 10 seconds is about the 166 watt-hours of energy. Or about the equivalent of a small 12 volt, 14 amp*hr motorcycle battery. I can't imaging that energy efficiency or the energy/weight ratio is higher than a battery.

  23. Haven't F1 cars been doing this for a while? by istartedi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I seem to recall having heard that Formula 1 cars have been doing this for a while. Obviously it's just a short power burst. You can't store much energy in it without severe weight penalties.

    The advantage of this over an ultracapacitor is that you keep it all mechanical. If the car were already a gas-electric hybrid, you'd probably rather use an ultracap.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Haven't F1 cars been doing this for a while? by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      If you read the article, you'll see the car in question is a petrol/electric hybrid. It's got a regular petrol engine driving the rear wheels and electric motors driving the rear wheels. They use electrical energy to spin up the flywheel, and tap the kinetic energy in the flywheel as electrical energy to add a boost of power to the front wheels.

      The energy density of ultracapacitors is not as good as a 40k rpm flywheel...

  24. Re:Hello? News for NERDS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    911 has four seats.

  25. Mechanical Hybrids by nido · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... A few years ago I heard about Tom Kasmer's hydraulic transmission. He calls it the Hydristor (also: wikipedia entry).

    Basically, an invention like Kasmer's could be used to turn any car into a hybrid by replacing the transmission. Braking energy is stored in a hydraulic pressure system (the proper name escapes me at the moment).

    While this system from Porsche is interesting, it is not revolutionary.

    The next automotive revolution will be some form of retrofit.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:Mechanical Hybrids by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Is it a hydraulic accumulator you mean?

      They used a few of them in that marvellous fusion of aesthetics and engineering, the Citroën DS. It's a pity that the latest model to bear that name is just another anonymous hatchback. I tried to look at the Citroen site to see if it had any interesting new tech in it but car makers are the absolute limit when it comes to impossible-to-navigate, stupid bloody flash sites.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    2. Re:Mechanical Hybrids by nido · · Score: 1

      Is it a hydraulic accumulator you mean?

      That's it - thanks!

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    3. Re:Mechanical Hybrids by torkus · · Score: 1

      I remember reading that UPS was looking into this for their delivery trucks. Personally I think USPS would have even more use - those idiots literally drive from house to house in my area including starting and turning off the car to get out and walk up my lawn. Seriously...it's the dumbest thing i've seen in a very long time.

      Anyhow, delivery vehicles where there's plenty of available space, not as much concern about weight, and lots of stop-and-go driving this seems like a great idea.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    4. Re:Mechanical Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ugh not new at all. research into series, parallel, sequential hydrualic drive trains has ugh resulted in uhh almost all industrial vehicle power systems. Tom Kasmer is only a pioneer to one ignorant person [you]

  26. Re: No KERS in F1 in 2010 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    KERS was mostly a disaster in 2009 by allowing teams to use it, but not mandating it. At the end of the season, all teams agreed to abandon the technology. The BMW F1 team bet heavily on KERS and designed their car around it. After challenging for the championship in 2008, their 2009 campaign was so poor, they quit F1 altogether.

  27. advantage by zogger · · Score: 1

    Maybe they could slave the high speed flywheel to the steering and tilt it for cornering.

    1. Re:advantage by CdBee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe they have 2 counter-rotating flywheels

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    2. Re:advantage by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Gyroscopes resist changes on both directions, ie. it wouldn't help.

      The only way is to use a horizontal mounted gyroscope.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:advantage by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      Yes but the resisting forces would cancel each other (if properly managed), though there may be some stressing of metal housing. There were studies on using counter-rotating flywheels for both attitude and power control on the Space Station over 10 years ago, though I don't think anything has come of it since then.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    4. Re:advantage by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      Could you make those two flywheels work independently of each other, and then link them to the steering somehow? That way, if you want to break and steer left, only the flywheel spinning clockwise would accelerate, thereby helping the car in the turn.
      Or would it be more trouble than it's worth?

      --
      What?
  28. Re:Hello? News for NERDS. by ukemike · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Though the common computer nerd is the most high profile and widely recognized nerd, there are in fact many varieties of nerds found in the wild. Today we will feature the mechanical engineer. The ME once dominated the high tech world creating turbines, fighter jets, and space rockets. Today it is common to find an odd crossbreed of the ME nerd and the car geek. This type of nerd stands out in several important ways. The mechanical engineer / car geek, often displays impressive social skills when compared to the meager skills of the computer nerd. ME's consider computers to be a means to an end instead of the end itself. One other common characteristic of the ME nerd / car geek is that he typically considered the various iterations of the Porsche 911 to be the very pinnacles of industrial design.

    --
    -- QED
  29. HOV Lane Sticker? by ukemike · · Score: 1

    I wanna know if I can get one of those stickers for the carpool lane with the 911 GT3 Hybrid.

    --
    -- QED
  30. Mass would be a problem by Quila · · Score: 1

    With race cars, the lighter the better -- better braking, better turning, better acceleration.

    With flywheels it's the opposite, the more mass the better (the more energy it will hold at a given speed).

    It looks like the flywheel will rectify only one of the above performance components that its extra mass hurts -- acceleration.

    1. Re:Mass would be a problem by OrangeCatholic · · Score: 1

      Actually, from the discussion it sounds like the gyroscopic forces keep the car from tipping in a turn.

    2. Re:Mass would be a problem by eagle8635 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's true, and why I personally think hybrid sports cars don't generally make a great deal of sense. However, from what I've been able to find, the Porsche system is apparently lighter than the equivalent battery-based hybrid system, and in a 24 hour endurance race like the one this car will be competing in, efficiency becomes really important, probably more so than being able to overtake in the corners. That's one of the reasons diesel cars do so well at LeMans, even though many of the gasoline-powered cars can corner faster, over the course of 24 hours the efficiency and straight line speed advantages allow them to win.

    3. Re:Mass would be a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my first thought too. Flywheels depend on mass, and mass is the arch-enemy in race car design.

      You can trade mass for RPM though, and it sounds at 40,000 RPM like they've done that.

  31. KERS "killed" by regulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    FOTA limited the amount of energy that can be stored on KERSs to be tiny, thus render KERS useless. that led to the disaster.

  32. That's Nothing by mbstone · · Score: 1

    How To Keep Your Volkswagen Alive has added a chapter on how to add on a hamster wheel.

    1. Re:That's Nothing by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but as Porsche has found out, flies work much better than hamsters.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  33. "Innovative"? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    and an innovative flywheel system that stores kinetic energy from braking

    Wow, then about every subway train and bus in my city must be from the future, because they had flywheels for at least a decade.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:"Innovative"? by VON-MAN · · Score: 1

      Yes, and most children's toy cars have had one for a couple of decades. Yet, when busses got one it was innovation as well.

    2. Re:"Innovative"? by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      They're also a lot bigger than a Porsche, and with all the extra weight gyroscopic effects aren't really much of an issue.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  34. Re:Hello? News for NERDS. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    nerds found in the wild.

    I don’t think “basement” counts as “in the wild”. Unless the mold has become sentient...

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  35. Flywheel? What position? by rew · · Score: 1

    If you put the flywheel with the axis horizontal, the car will resist turning. My guess is that this doesn't work so well for a racing car....

    If you put the flywheel with the axis vertical, the car would lift its inside wheels when cornering a banked turn, right?

    1. Re:Flywheel? What position? by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      They usually put the flyvheel mounted in a gymbal, spinning with a vertical axis. Make that a pair and you can cancel out the charge/discharge reaction force too.

    2. Re:Flywheel? What position? by rew · · Score: 1

      OK. makes sense! why didn't I think of that?

  36. translation: by rarel · · Score: 1

    Porsche's latest supercar will use the same 911 production platform available to consumers today, with a few race-ready features

    Translation: They just needed to fit the accelerator gear with Toyota-built pedals and now they're all set.

  37. Re: No KERS in F1 in 2010 by pmontra · · Score: 3, Informative

    They allowed the KERS to store only 80 HP and it could be used for at most 6 seconds per lap.
    Add to this that none of the teams that planned to use KERS designed a car with a double diffuser, an aerodinamical device allowed by a loophole in the rules initially exploited by only three teams. The double diffuser turned out to be far more important than the KERS for the performances of the car. Brawn GP got an expecially good implementation of the device and won 6 of the first 7 races. After that they coasted to win the championship as the other teams struggled to catch up. KERS teams got on par only on the last races of the season.
    By the way, BMW abandoned KERS quite early in the season and it used it only on one of its cars.

  38. I love my 911... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a 911. From the late 80s. This is an amazing machine. It's right there in hacker folklore alongside IBM Model M and HP LaserJet 4M+: indestructible machines of outstanding quality.

    1. Re: I love my 911... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surrrrrrrre ya do... right.

  39. Re:Hello? News for NERDS. by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

    Speaking as an ME who switched from CS I agree wholeheartedly with the social skills part of your comment. You're also spot on with computers being a means to an end but that might have something to do with the computer part in CS, what? But when it comes to Porsches it's all a matter of taste; personally I think the shape is pleasant enough but the shape isn't designed by an ME. It's a nice bit of design but the pinnacle you're talking about is getting really rear-engined cars to handle as well as they do.

    When people say industrial design these days they usually mean the outside appearance (I'm looking at you, Apple). MEs are the ones who actually make things work, usually involving a lot of sniggering at the faaarr-out and totally impractical designs that designers come up with. Rather the same as the difference between the ridiculous crap that's paraded down "fashion" catwalks and what people actually wear.

    As an aside, for some reason I noticed the MEs drink a lot more than CS peeps, but that might be down to the perceived social deficiencies.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  40. Re: No KERS in F1 in 2010 by FonzCam · · Score: 1

    Williams had both a double diffuser and planned to use their KERS system but never got it operational before FOTA announced the decision not to use KERS in 2010.

  41. Jeremy might die by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    A porsche supercar, that is green. He will twist himself in so many idiotic claims, he might just croak.

    So, no downside to this then.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Jeremy might die by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      JC is probaly in intensive care after suffering a heart atack from laughing at the prius recall allready :-)

  42. Re:Hello? News for NERDS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a sanitation engineer for Waste Management Industries. Like MEs that can't get away from their jobs and so choose hobbies similar to their profession, I also like to play with kitchen refuse in my spare time. And the Automated Receptacle Lifter Assembly (ARLA) is a pinnacle of industrial design.

    Pssstt...Social skills include knowing when to stop talkin about your work.

  43. Not Ford... by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "This generator stores energy each time the vehicle breaks..."

    Just think of what this technology could do in the hands of Ford!

    Better yet, Toyota. Their cars already accelerate out of control - with the added energy from the flywheel system just think what they could do.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  44. makes it worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that doesnt help

    youre still changing the angular momentum of the gyroscope when you alter the axis of rotation. change of linear momentum corresponds to a force, change of angular momentum corresponds to a torque, the greater the change the greater the torque. two counter rotating flywheels would just double the amount of torque you would have to provide, so it makes it worse.

  45. Re:Hello? News for NERDS. by zmaragdus · · Score: 1

    And a bunch of us (well, technically I'm an EE, but still a fan od Porsche) who do like Porsche consider their latest two hybrids (see also the Cayenne) to be sort of a "sell out." Then again, they've been breaking from their expected image a lot in the past decade: an SUV, two hybrids, a {gasp} 4-door (see Panamera).Whatever is this world coming to?

    --
    (((dB)))
  46. Re:Not true ... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Physics 101: Energy = m * v^2

    ie. mass is far less important then velocity (RPM in the case of a flywheel).

    --
    No sig today...
  47. that is a torque by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    changing the angular momentum of the gyroscope when you alter the axis of rotation. change of linear momentum corresponds to a force, change of angular momentum corresponds to a torque, the greater the change the greater the torque.

    angular momentum is a vector quantity, so when it requires a torque to change the tilt of the bike, this provides the stability, but i dont see how what youve said is true, that it is not due to the angular momentum.

    what is the difference between an unstable stationary bike and a stable bike in motion? A: the wheels have I omega angular momentum (where I is the moment of inertia of each wheel)

    1. Re:that is a torque by scotch · · Score: 1

      Find a bike that doesn't have an angle on the front wheel fork that's acute where it meets the ground going back toward the bike. Well, you won't find one because it would be extremely hard to keep it up right. You're wrong.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
  48. Re:Hello? News for NERDS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    aspurgers?

  49. Counter rotating flywheels? by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Easy way to solve problem

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  50. Yawn -counter rotating flywheels by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Seriously -is it that hard to think about.
    And I'm sure that whatever is made will work F'ing fantastically - after all it's Porsche, and not uncle Earl in his shed.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Yawn -counter rotating flywheels by newdsfornerds · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Seriously, is it that hard to use a question mark?
      SRSLY????

      --
      Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  51. Tourbillion watch like? by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Huh - that's a nice thought. probably the tech has been worked out for something like that with the tourbillion watches already.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  52. Drink! by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    actualy its Civils that drink the most - I rember a semi serious discusion about which types of computer cleaning fluid where best for making bootleg hooch.

  53. Spectators will like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that accidents are the most popular aspect of car races, it will be hugely popular when a small imbalance makes the flywheel fly out of the car.
    And I wonder what they were thinking when they named this "911"...

  54. Posting to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...fix accidental incorrect moderation (damn scroll-wheel focus!).

  55. Re:Hello? News for NERDS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MEs consider 911s to be the pinnacle of industrial design? uhm, speak for yourself clown. I would take a modern CHP turbine, any modern turbine really, a 50yr old nuclear propulsion system, or even a hundred pieces of drilling/mining/excavation equipment designs over a funny little consumer toy.
     
    um also don't hold us to your dinosaur view of computers either.
      It's crazy troglodytes like yourself that drive enrollment into other engineering programs.

      AM I STANDING ON YOUR LAWN? CAN YOU EVEN HERE ME?

      ME's DO IT ALL. THERMO/TRANSPORT/POWER TRANSFER. We built the world and uhh, although you were perhaps laid off be refusing to adopt new skills, the rest of us will still be building it tomorrow. IT seems easier to teach semi conductor fab to MEs than thermo to EEs and o-chem to MEs than correct transport to CHEMEs. And all of us polished our CS skills, uhh, over one long weekend in 9th grade.....

  56. Re:Hello? News for NERDS. by afidel · · Score: 1

    I like the Panamera, one of the better looking modern Porsche designs, though not nearly as drool-worthy as the Carrera GT (why does that car not photograph as well as it looks in person?)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  57. Re:Hello? News for NERDS. by epine · · Score: 1

    Approximation is a social construct. Most of the kids who are frightfully accelerated end up in math or computer science or some hard core discipline which can be done with no recourse to social constructs whatsoever. A 14-year-old prodigy doesn't have much social context to fall back upon. There's too much social context in engineering to appeal to many of these kids: what part of the equation to cross off and ignore today because it typically ends up being a rounding error on a safety margin.

    These are the same kids who might have preferred engineering had they entered university at a more mature age. That's a selection bias that doesn't have much to do with it. I'm only interested in comparing people who have the engineering temperament with people who have the math/computer science temperament. There are some fairly deep differences in how these tribes approach simplicity, another social construct. It doesn't interest me much that math and physics are the best holding tanks for a certain type of person on an extreme cognitive development path.

    The other bias is how you count sobriety. An engineer has roughly the same amount of social skill, divided into fewer sober hours. How much skill is involved in drinking six pints? How much social skill is involved in counting binge drinking as a social skill? After graduation the engineers look around the room and go "we're all relatively normal" not counting their fallen comrades who succumbed to life-long alcoholism i.e. those who continue behaving the same way after leaving school.

    More of the attrition from math and computer science is by way of the psychiatric ward. A fallen engineer might end up turning a wrench in a pit crew (not at the F1 level). A fallen mathematician might go around knitting an imaginary blanket patterned after a Turkish fractal.

    I was thinking about cognitive bias earlier today. We're all pretty good at cooking the denominator, which seems to be a prerequisite for social acceptance. Social skill is most impressive when least understood. We're a strange species.

  58. Just think what they could do... by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "This generator stores energy each time the vehicle breaks..."

    Just think of what this technology could do in the hands of Ford!

    Better yet, Toyota. Their cars already accelerate out of control - with the added energy from the flywheel system just think what they could do.

    So, let me guess, they're going up against Rutan et al for the next X Prize? Cool!

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  59. Take a shave! by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Valentino Rossi can ride and piss all over your GT3 Porsche. Buddy Carl Foggerty the "Blackburn Bullet" will eat you for breakfast on a bike. The only person that is almost 31337 can break the world record is my beautiful baby Sabine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabine_Schmitz she is ready for the world record. that woman is awesome and she can put cars through their paces and you WILL PASS out as she knows how to pull pull devastating G-Forces more than a tornado jet.Sabine Rocks *hugs*

    --
    All cows eat grass!
  60. wow by Phoghat · · Score: 1

    Ein Blitz, eine Wolke von Staub und ein herzliches HALLO Ho Silver "the mark of the intellectual is anyone while hearing the "William Tell Overture" doesn't think of the Lone Ranger"

    --
    Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  61. Adding another comment by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 1

    Sabine must take the world record. Michael Schumacher aka "The Stig" has zero power on this woman. She is devasting, Who said she cannot race, with Valentno Rossi in front of her or if the "Blackburn Bullet" Foggy comes out of retirement to lead her as a pace maker or Rossi, I swear she will do a world record. If we can have Paul http://www.redbullairrace.com/cs/Satellite?c=RB_Profile&childpagename=RedBullAirRace%2FLayout&cid=1238611549646&pagename=RedBullAirRaceWrapper to hit this and he is going to do this.GOD BLESS the RAF! if he hits the g-forces my baby Sabine can do it too.

    --
    All cows eat grass!
  62. Great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...not only are Porsche drivers a bunch of wankers - not they can be smug like all the other hybrid car drivers.