20 Years of Photoshop
benwiggy writes "Photoshop turned 20 on 10th February 2010. Here's an excellent history, including how the Knoll family created one of the biggest apps of all time. The article also has screenshots of the workspace through the versions."
Photoshopping photos over 20 years old to show people using Photoshop. Then claim they are legit. "Photoshop is over 20 years old, you can clearly see here they were using it during the Civil War!"
The enemies of Democracy are
This article looks totally photoshopped, its probably fake.
pics or it didnt happen
'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
Unfortunately, Adobe has some smart people in Marketing. I'm sure they have a pile of new features hidden in a source code repository that lies underneath an unassuming bungalow in a suburb near Burbank. Every 18 months, senior marketing staff, cleverly disguised as Roto-Rooter workers, go to this stash and pull a few likely features.
These get grafted on to Photoshop with the idea that they are just flashy and / or important enough to get people to upgrade. Thus, Photoshop CS(x) + 1 is born.
Then, the evil bit folks trot out the latest activation code tweaks to the dismay of right thinking folk everywhere.
And somewhere in a damp basement cell, the Bridge team codes on, hoping that if they ever get it right, they might be let out into the sunshine some day.
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
http://xkcd.com/331/
Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
You're just saying that to obscure your interest in counterfeiting.
Twenty years of lens flare.
Between jpegtran, exiftool, and ImageMagick you could probably do all of those things. The nice thing is that you can use them from the command line; no GUI bloat necessary, although ImageMagick has a GUI.
Yeah, I can't possibly imagine why anyone would want a GUI when manipulating images...
What PS has what GIMP does not have?
A grammar check?