Slashdot Mirror


I Use Twitter, Please Rob Me

nk497 writes "Developers looking to prove a point about the information people are sharing on social networking sites have unveiled a new tool called Please Rob Me. It hunts out tweets from people who are also using location-based services telling the world that they're out of town, and then directs the world to go rob their house. The creators of the site said: 'Don't get us wrong, we love the whole location-aware thing. The information is very interesting and can be used to create some pretty awesome applications. However, the way in which people are stimulated to participate in sharing this information is less awesome.' How long until the first actual robbery takes place?"

12 of 403 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Idaho · · Score: 4, Informative

    Doubt it, since they obviously don't live in the USA. Good for them, then :)

    --
    Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
  2. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Potor · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most houses are empty between 9-5, MTWTrF.

  3. Re:Honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I just wish the bait cars were full of explosives.

    Honestly, Blow up a few car jackers or car thieves and make it REALLY public and suddenly car thefts will go way down.

    I'm fairly sure this even if you side step the constitutional protection for due process, this form of summary corporal punishment and/or execution would be considered cruel and unusual punishment.

  4. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Informative
    You can also follow the site owner on twitter: http://twitter.com/Mikepruett
    >Mikepruett
    >Mike Pruett | Rochester, MN
    >@WheresKiger Just eat at a new fast food place called Nupa Express on 11thAve NW and Civic Center Drive it was GREAT 11:12 PM Sep 15th, 2009

    ... and rob HIS house when he's not home:

    >Domain name: PLEASESUEME.COM
    >Pruett, Mike mlt@mltgroup.com
    >4012 5th Place NW, Rochester, MN 55901

    Give him a call to tell him you appreciate being able to track him: 507-281-3490

  5. Geez SFC by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not only did you completely miss the joke, but at least to moderators did as well. It's a honeypot, you don't want a deterrent like a dog post.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  6. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Tuidjy · · Score: 2, Informative

    You'd have a better chance in court if you shot them while they were on your property
    than if you electrocuted them with a contraption that was clearly non-accidental.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished...
  7. Re:Just because you can... by cduffy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I haven't told Foursquare about my Twitter account, or about my Facebook account, or about anything else. I use it because some places I frequent offer discounts to customers who do; that's it.

    So -- by default, Foursquare can't talk to anything else; it's your friends who hook it up to Twitter and such who are being the asses.

  8. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 3, Informative

    not sure where you got that premise of the castle doctrine, in most southern states with that law (like texas) you don't have to be in fear for your life, or the intruder even be armed, if at your own residence.
    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/852831/deadly_force_and_self_defense_to_protect.html?cat=17
    Pretty much every state says you don't have to retreat from your property instead of deadly confrontation, (ie any "I was scared for my life" defense, if reasonable, would work at home.) Some states even allow you to protect yourself with deadly force to hold your ground in any setting where you are legally allowed to be.

  9. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by eleuthero · · Score: 3, Informative

    the only problem with this is that depending on how he placed the spikes, caltrops are completely legal (parking lot entrances with one way spikes, etc.). I agree that he could have run into problems if he didn't follow local laws, but spikes in the road are not by their very nature illegal.

  10. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by P-Nuts · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yup. And the guy who put the spikes in the road was crazy lucky. Even clearly marked booby traps are against the law pretty much across the US, and if the guy riding the 4-wheeler fell on a spike and was injured or killed, the owner could expect some fun jail time as well as a most excellent lawsuit.

    What's the legality of the "severe tire damage" spikes you have in car parks to stop people going the wrong way?

  11. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by eleuthero · · Score: 2, Informative

    He was referring to states that either had stringent rules or did not have "castle doctrine" laws. There was an article in the news a few years back about a guy in Michigan who was being tried for murder after shooting someone who entered his house with the intent to rob him (assault as well?). It is intriguing (and I do not know the outcome) but Wikipedia reports that Michigan only recently created a castle doctrine (2006).

  12. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Informative

    You should tell my local supermarket that. They have spikes so that traffic can only exit through it, otherwise it just pops their tires. So far, no one has gone to jail for it (somehow, I think you're thinking of much different kinds of spikes).