Slashdot Mirror


Lego Robot Solves Any Rubik's Cube In 12 Seconds

kkleiner writes "Cube Stormer is the latest creation from Mike Dobson, aka Robotics Solutions, and not only is it made entirely out of Legos, it can solve any 3x3 Rubik's cube in less than twelve seconds. Often it can finish in less than five! This thing looks bad-ass and is incredible to watch."

6 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. Stickers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And heres me expecting to see a robot that can quickly rearrange the stickers.

  2. Re:Obligatory by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only people who care about that pointless distinction are trademark lawyers.

    For the rest of us, they're simply called LEGOS.

  3. Re:Obligatory by H0p313ss · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the rest of us, they're simply called LEGOS.

    The world is divided into two groups, those that call them Legos and those that make fun of the first group.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  4. Re:That's fast by c6gunner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you sure? Just about every Asian I know can do it that quickly, and they make up about 30% of the world's population.

    That's because in China they use The People's Cube

  5. Re:This Video is FAKE by bondsbw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The next to last solve (at 41s) takes 21 moves*, and is the only cube claimed to be random... thus, I don't see any dishonesty. It takes around 1.9 seconds to analyze, about 0.4 seconds to reset/process, and the remaining 8+ seconds to solve. Therefore, it makes on average between 2 and 3 turns per second.

    Humans do not include inspection time in the speed calculation (at least, that's the case in the accompanying video of the world record). An apples-to-apples comparison, therefore, would be the human time at 7 seconds and the robot at a little over 8. I couldn't follow the world-record video, but I think I saw at least one mistake (a move followed by the opposite move) and a little hesitation. So, you're probably correct in the 3-5 moves per second for humans.

    *21 includes twice that the computer simultaneously moves two faces, each counted as two separate moves. 180 degree moves are counted once.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  6. Re:This Video is FAKE by TheGeniusIsOut · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you watch carefully, the "Full Solve", which states such and claims to be a "totally random cube (Honest)", takes 10.75 seconds, including inspection. The 2.01 second solve is a demonstration of the MINIMUM time required for "inspecting and making one twist" on an unsolved cube. It is the blogger, and not the video, who makes the claims of solving in 2.01 seconds, and while it technically is a solve, the inventor rightfully does not claim such. The world record human solve of 7.08 seconds is not including the untimed inspection period. I would not consider this a dishonest video, since the video does not claim anything but the 10.75s solve to be a real solve, which by the rules of the second video's competition, would actually be an 8.74s solve....

    --
    Ignorance is Bliss -- And the Opposite is True -- Genius is Madness