Slashdot Mirror


Valve's Battle Against Cheaters

wjousts writes "IEEE Spectrum takes a look behind the scenes at Valve's on-going efforts to battle cheaters in online games: 'Cheating is a superserious threat,' says [Steam's lead engineer, John] Cook. 'Cheating is more of a serious threat than piracy.' The company combats this with its own Valve Anti-Cheat System, which a user consents to install in the Steam subscriber agreement. Cook says the software gets around anti-virus programs by handling all the operations that require administrator access to the user's machine. So, how important is preventing cheating? How much privacy are you willing to sacrifice in the interests of a level playing field? 'Valve also looks for changes within the player's computer processor's memory, which might indicate that cheat code is running.'"

6 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. Privacy? by zoloto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't run Windows for privacy, I run it to play games. My real work stays on my Linux/OS X machine.

  2. Re:Really? by w32jon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the intent is closer to:

    "Cheating kills your game because it makes legit players not want to play it anymore, whereas pirates don't affect your legit users"

  3. Re:Ayn Rand had a lot to say about this by ShooterNeo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Erm, actually...the best athletes in the world are that way because of their tremendous hard work, genetic endowment, AND because they take steroids...The BEST athletes use everything.

  4. Re:Ayn Rand had a lot to say about this by obarthelemy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you saying that top sportsmen/women don't use drugs ?

    On which planet ?

    I'd actually be surprised if a single one of the top 20 athletes in every sport was NOT using drugs. Popular team sports seem to suffer less from the issue than athletics only because they are more commercial, thus care less about fairness and the health of their practitioners, thus enforce much less strict controls. It took deaths on the Tour de France for cyclism to tackle the issue.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  5. Re:VAC is a joke by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You cannot keep cheating from happening unless you control the server (and even then it's not trivial). End of story.

    I (and so many, many others) foretold that before MW2 came out and that cheating will ruin that game within days, possibly weeks, of release. Unlike others, I stood with my decision to avoid buying it, simply because yes, it would have been a killer game that I really wanted, but I also knew that playing it will be an ongoing frustration with cheaters running rampart.

    Why bother buying a game, even if it was the best game on the planet, if you can't play it sensibly?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Re:Ayn Rand had a lot to say about this by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What all these anti-cheating efforts fail to realize is that cheating is an integral part of the game, especially in computer gaming. Given that such a cheat can be performed by anyone, the playing field is *always* level in the aggregate. By removing actions that they consider cheating, they are removing key gameplay elements and ultimately changing the face of the game.

    Additionally, it says a lot that they must resort to installing what is essentially a rootkit just to make sure someone isn't taking advantage of superior technology or extra knowledge. If these games are so unplayable with cheating enabled, perhaps the designers shouldn't have put those features in.

    Crippling superior players is Communism.

    What all these anti-murder efforts fail to realize is that murder is an integral part of life, especially in America. Given that such a murder can be performed by anyone, the playing field is *always* level in the aggregate. By removing actions that they consider murder, they are removing key life goals and ultimately changing the face of humanity.

    Additionally, it says a lot that they must resort to installing what is essentially a police force just to make sure someone isn't taking advantage of superior ability to murder or extra knowledge of how to carry it out. If life is so difficult with frequent random murdering allowed, perhaps we shouldn't have been made mortal

    Crippling superior murderers is Communism.

    The problem with Ayn Rand is that her hysterics appeal to a lot of high school students who forget to think about them in more detail when they grow up.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)