Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Adobe Download Manager Installing Software Without Consent

Posted by timothy on from the plus-one-invitation dept.

"Not all is worth cheering about as Adobe turns 20," writes reader adeelarshad82, who excerpts from a story at PC Magazine's Security Watch: "Researcher Aviv Raff has found a problem in ADM (Adobe Download Manager) and the method through which it is delivered from adobe.com. The net effect of the problem is that a user can be tricked into downloading and installing software using ADM without actual consent. Tonight Adobe acknowledged the report and said they were working on the issue with Raff and NOS Microsystems, the company that wrote ADM."

6 of 98 comments (clear)

  1. No surprise there.... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I inherently distrust download managers. You don't need them. Just give me an http, ftp or (in some cases) torrent download and that's all I need. Download managers are not needed, they are additional fluff for nothing. It gets on my nerves they usually get forced down your throat and you need to jump through hoops on fire to get to a normal download.

    1. Re:No surprise there.... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I not only distrust download managers, I don't see the fucking point. To my mind, the only reason any of these guys make them is so they can make back doors to stuff what you don't want with what you do. Naturally these download managers have the potential of being abused either by the company or by some third party exploiting them.

      If I can't download the thing through FTP, HTTP or bittorrent, I'm not interested, period. There's no technical reason for download managers, and thus any company that uses them has some nefarious goal in mind.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:No surprise there.... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can explain the point to you:

      See, Linux/BSD systems have this nice thing called a ‘package manager”. And since all software is free, you essentially have a nice “app store”-like interface, where you can install everything (out of currently over 13,000 packages here on Gentoo) you like.

      Then when you want to update things, you can just call one global update program, and be done with it. Everything that has an update available, will be updated. With tons of options on what you want to block, what you want to allow despite it being marked as unstable, etc, etc, etc.

      After a while, when your rule set is stabilizing, and you routinely do those updates, you start to feel the natural need to automate it. (Unfortunately, most Windows users lack that need, since they are trained to use a PC like an appliance.) So you automate it.

      Now of course, big companies get all wet or stiff down there, when they see such a system. But since there is no such thing for Windows, they try to imitate it with such a download manager. Badly.

      But since everyone rolls his own thing, does not give you any control, and they don’t understand all aspects of package management anyway, you get a mess of tons of stupid background processes doing stupid (and sometimes useful) things without asking you.

      This is a opportunity that Microsoft clearly missed. Sure, they have Windows Update, which is not that bad and does the job for Windows itself, plus some drivers. But they should have offered a real package manager, and allow others to integrate into it. That would have given them big plus points from companies and users.

      And now we’re in the mess.
      But hey: You can still make some room and install a beginner-friendly Linux distribution, to go to, when you start pulling hairs again. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:No surprise there.... by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I can't download the thing through FTP, HTTP or bittorrent, I'm not interested, period.

      You aren't the market. The non technical end user is the market. The user who isn't even aware that his PC has an FTP client - and won't install one short of being forced to do so at gun point. The geek lost this battle along about AOL 3.0 for Windows.

  2. Re:Bonjour by Itninja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I also dislike the opt-out Safari install that I have to remember every time I upgrade iTunes.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  3. Re:Bonjour by Toonol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I occasionally post a negative comment about Apple. Worse, I sometimes post a politically conservative comment. And, yet, my Karma has been excellent for years.

    It may have something to do with (1) sometimes posting worthwhile comments and (2) not being a vulgar idiot.

    Please consider doing either or both in the future.