Slashdot Mirror


Space Junk Getting Worse

HockeyPuck writes "According to Space.com the amount of space junk is getting worse. 'A head-on collision was averted between a spent upper stage from a Chinese rocket and the European Space Agency's (ESA) huge Envisat Earth remote-sensing spacecraft. [...] But what if the two objects had tangled? Such a space collision would have caused mayhem in the heavens, adding clutter to an orbit altitude where there are big problems already, said Heiner Klinkrad, head of the European Space Agency's Space Debris Office in Darmstadt, Germany."

12 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Time to send up Quark! by Tetsujin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like it is time an outerspace garbage man.

    Where can I apply for that job?

    I hear Technora Corp is putting together some kind of department for this...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  2. Perhaps.. by Bearded+Frog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Could we just continue this trend and call it a shield against alien invasions? I for one welcome the trash shield.

    1. Re:Perhaps.. by sbillard · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not just a shield again alien invasion. It can reflect sunlight back into space before it's trapped by greenhouse gases. Bye bye global warming!

  3. I thought space was a vacuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    So why don't they just use it and clean up?

  4. Re:Push them further away by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Funny

    That wouldn't take much fuel or anything...

  5. Re:Push them further away by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Exactly, so we should build a gigantic ground based laser that can vaporize a school bus sized object in 1/4 a second. I want the beam to be 30 feet wide and blackout every city in a hemisphere when it fires. Heck make it powerful enough that it adjusts the earth's orbit due to the amount of photos being fired.

    Plus we can use it when the aliens get here all pissed off that we are cluttering up the lower EM spectrum with a lot of useless chatter.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. Re:or pull them back by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    We do exactly that. We let them burn up in the atmosphere, or crash into the ocean. The parts then get dissolved in the rain, or in the ocean water. The dissolved little bits get laid down on the ocean floor and riverbeds as mineral deposits. These mineral deposits get mined. The ore gets refined. New parts are designed, and voila, a few million years from now you get a shiny new starboard reticle articulation trunion. Why, the very reticle articulation trunions used on the shuttle Discovery were once part of a Jurasic era weather monitoring satellite.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  7. Re:Push them further away by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

    We should start sending all our garbage there.

    I agree, but how will we convince all 535 members of Congress to get on the space ship?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  8. there is no space junk "problem" by Jawn98685 · · Score: 4, Funny

    A group of "industry scientists" has, they claim, shown conclusively that there is no "space junk problem". Moreover, they have shown that even if there is a problem, it is not man-made but is instead, due to natural changes that are cyclical in nature.

    1. Re:there is no space junk "problem" by dadelbunts · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hell and i could see the moon last night. If there is so much spacejunk how come i can see the moon. Answer me that.

  9. Re:Push them further away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It'd be like flying one bag of trash from New York to China on its own private charter jet.

    Didn't that already happen?

  10. Re:Push them further away by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Funny

    I suggest we create a fleet of Ark ships. Elected officials get on Ark Ship #2.

          Brett