Slashdot Mirror


iPad Will Beat Netbooks With "Magic"

entirely_fluffy writes "In a talk intended to woo investors, Apple Chief Operating Officer Tim Cook said the iPad will win over potential netbook buyers, but not because of specs or features. No, Cook said, the iPad's magical properties will seal the deal. 'The netbook is not an experience people are going to continue wanting to have,' Cook said, according to Macworld. 'When they play with the iPad and experience the magic of using it ... I have a hard time believing they're going to go for a netbook.'" Another thing that would help would be a camera and a $100 discount, but hey Magic is cool too, provided they have enough mana.

5 of 1,010 comments (clear)

  1. Re:$100 discount? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple already beat all estimations on what it'd cost. I think everyone on /. was estimating around $999 (as was everyone else on the net). All of the closest competitors are around that price point.

    Why not just ask for it for free?

    A camera would be nice.

    Freescale has a similar device that they're targeting for the $199 price point. The Smartbook comes with a camera and USB ports, and is a 7" touchscreen tablet.

  2. Re:The magic of a black box by natehoy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Umm, because I can watch them just fine on my iPod Touch?

    I was watching highlights of Olympic Hockey last night on it, from NBC's Olympic site. I've watched YouTube videos on it. No problem.

    Or are you suggesting that Apple is going to remove all that functionality when the iPad comes out?

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  3. Re:Hunters.. by box4831 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like he was comparing a netbook to a typical laptop rather than the iPad

    --
    Miller Lite tastes like water that's somehow managed to rot.
  4. Re:That Explains The Updated SDK by Totenglocke · · Score: 4, Informative

    The thing really sounds like what most people want for a computer.

    Sorry, but I have to disagree. It comes close to being what most people want. However, most people want the full internet and lack of Flash on the iPad prevents that. Most people want to be able to install any program they might choose in order to do task XYZ and unfortunately, that's just not happening with the way the iPhone / iPod Touch / iPad are locked down. Look around the App Store sometime, most of it is utter crap (I have an iPhone and love it, but I can count the number of worthwhile apps on my fingers). Most people also want to be able to easily copy over movies, pictures, and other files - the iPad only allows that for pictures (with the SD reader attachment). The hardware of the iPad is great (well, most people would also like to have a webcam), but the software side of it being so locked down hamstrings it.

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  5. Re:Hunters.. by node+3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The hell are you talking about?

    He's talking about all the rumors saying it would be "less than $1,000", which means $999

    When it was first announced it was announced WITH the price, and the general reaction, here and other places I looked, was "wow, that would be nice if it was $300".

    No, the general reaction here (and some other places) was that it's a big iPhone, and it would be nice if it was a tablet MacBook. Criticism that it would be a good product at $300 wasn't to be found anywhere. The 32GB iPod touch costs that much.

    The only criticism that mentioned anything about $300 was that netbooks cost that much, and are "more capable". Where the iPad $300, those people would have just said, "for the same price, I can buy a netbook that is more capable", as their argument really isn't about the price, but about wanting a small device that runs Windows, Linux, or Mac OS X, which the iPad most certainly is not (and for good reason).