Slashdot Mirror


Losing Google Would Hit Chinese Science Hard

An anonymous reader writes to share recent statements by Chinese scientists that indicate troubled waters ahead if Google were to pull out of China. "More than three-quarters of scientists in China use the search engine Google as a primary research tool and say their work would be significantly hampered if they were to lose it, a survey showed on Wednesday. In the survey, 84 percent said losing Google would 'somewhat or significantly' hamper their research and 78 percent said international collaborations would be affected. 'Research without Google would be like life without electricity,' one Chinese scientist said in the survey, which asked more than 700 scientists for their views."

15 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. So, what they're saying is... by bsDaemon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, how long, then, until we see the govt "encouraging" Google to get out of China for national security reasons?

  2. Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green by j-pimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's an American controlled company, so yes it would be more accurate to say a subset of Americans should deny a subset of Chinese their service.

    Semantics aside, google would be better off threatening the Chinese to remove their search access than to actualyl do it. Nothing is stopping the Chinese from building their own search engine.

    --
    --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
  3. Re:Being IN China necessary? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just because Google has no offices or data centers in China would not mean it would be unavailable there.

    Well, if you go to China you'll find that it's amazingly easy to trigger the GFW. Browsing the English web is really flaky. Even if the Chinese govt didn't pro-actively block Google (as they have done with Facebook and YouTube) it'd still be a pain to use it.

    Censored perhaps, but how difficult would it be for "Scientists" to get around that, or be exempted from it?

    I don't think the Chinese government offers "exemptions" except for foreign journalists (sometimes). I also suspect they view circumvention dimly. The whole point of the GFW is to stop smart, influential people from getting ideas they shouldn't!

  4. Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green by Tolkien · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They have their own search engines (Baidu), but Google is significant because it would impact *international collaboration*. This would be bad for all involved.

  5. Re:What about Baidu? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...nations and fields of research are not yet dependent on them...

    So you're willfully ignoring the testimony of Chinese scientists? That's like watching something fall and then saying you don't believe in gravity.

    Baidu is a sino-centric search engine, which for the average Chinese is a positive thing as they don't frequently need international results, but for scientists who constantly need international and multi-lingual results, Baidu doesn't hold a candle to Google. That's why Baidu has the majority of marketshare in China nationally, but is a minority among Chinese scientists.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  6. Reverse Engineering by AP31R0N · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Losing Google Would Hit Chinese Reverse Engineering Hard

    FTfY

    Funny thing: our schools are packed with Chinese students and profs.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  7. Re:What about Baidu? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Google is a remarkable company and a remarkable search engine, but it shouldn't be that hard for other engines to provide at least a facsimile of what it does in the search area.

    I haven't seen much (in terms of free web-based services) to compete with Google Scholar in terms of searching journals, searching forward and back through their mutual citations, and finding the versions of articles that aren't the main one locked behind the original journal's paywall.

  8. Re:Google Scholar by xkcdFan1011011101111 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    PubMed doesn't spit out bibtex entries for papers, show how many citations a paper has, show who has CITED a specific paper, or have near the search power. Google Scholar may not have your field pegged yet, and PubMed might be an important place for your paper to show up, but Google Scholar has vital features that no other search engine has.

  9. Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they don't want to hire citizens here, they can incorporate somewhere else.

  10. Re:"I hope you have the time of your life"- Green by haruchai · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not to mention, if Google pulls out, China would have a more difficult time to steal their IP to build
    a comparable search engine.

    I'm only half-kidding

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  11. China, research giant... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My initial reaction to this was "what, they don't have other search engines on the Internet?" I mean, I use Google myself, and I'm quite happy with it, but if it disappeared tomorrow I'd just start using something else.

    My initial reaction was, "what, China actually conducts its own research rather than steal it?!?!?!"

    But that is an unfair generalization. As I thought about it more carefully I realized that of course China does its own research. It is after all, a world leader in industrial espionage, miniature camera technology, and software security. You don't get to the front of such competitive fields without doing a LOT of research in them...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:China, research giant... by coaxial · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wow, you even managed to troll during your superficial walk back. But heaven forbid you actually examine the facts.

  12. "Research"? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chinese "research", eh?

    I wonder how much of that research is "find places to steal information from and use it". Seems we've had a fair number of news articles lately about Chinese espionage, and it doesn't take much imagination to see that a lot of the "new" things from China are actually reverse engineered Western items.

    Without effective search, I suspect all the shops in China making Apple product knockoffs would be hard pressed to bring products to market. Likewise for many other industries.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  13. Re:What about Baidu? by HeckRuler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I regularly ignore the testimony of the masses when it comes to religion, politics, economics, and yes, tech as well.
    Why? Because at times I'm cynical and think everyone is an idiot. Case in point: The ipod sold well.

    So why not Bing, Yahoo, Altavista, Dogpile, yada yada.... Or why not go to a foreign Google site?

  14. GOOD by Favonius+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They've been stealing our tech for so long, they deserve it.

    --
    "Men willingly believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar