Slashdot Mirror


LG Launches Watch Phone In India

roh2cool writes "If you are a watch freak and also happen to be a fan of ultra rare (and expensive) gadgets, this might just interest you. The LG GD910 watch phone looks like a normal watch – except for the fact that it can double up as your mobile phone when needed. 'It is quite thin at just 13.9mm and packs in 3G and Video Calling capabilities as well. The phone is quite stylish and the front fascia is covered by scratch-proof tempered glass. It comes with a Bluetooth headset so you don’t have to keep talking like David Hasselhoff talked to his super-car KITT in the “Knight Rider” series.'"

13 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. And now ... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... the obligatory Dick Tracy mention.

  2. Ridiculous by the+brown+guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Phones in India are normally cheaper than here in Canada, but 49,990 rupees is 1138.21 CAD, you would have to be stupid to buy this phone.

    Anybody know when it comes to Canada?

    --
    Orbis terrarum est non altus satis
    1. Re:Ridiculous by thms · · Score: 4, Insightful

      49,990 Indian Rupees mean = 1,084.26 US$ (according to xe.com) - no way the hardware or RD costs are that high, so they are milking it for the novelty factor for now. Seems India has a large enough middle class in search of status symbols now as well. But I wonder what technological breakthrough took so long that wrist-phones only show up now.

      The LG Product page mentions a 510mAh battery for 7-8 days no standby, and again no easily replaceable battery it seems.

    2. Re:Ridiculous by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Phones in India are normally cheaper than here in Canada, but 49,990 rupees is 1138.21 CAD, you would have to be stupid to buy this phone.

      And even stupider to host your website on it...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    3. Re:Ridiculous by camperdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People are willing to pay 20 times that for a watch that does nothing more than tell the date and time.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  3. Nice but... by aBaldrich · · Score: 3, Informative

    It costs over one thousand dollars. And, who wants video calls in such a tiny screen?
    Just by googling "watch phone" I found many different waistphones for US$ 250 or less.

    --
    In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
  4. Re:I'll still be wearing it on my belt, thanks by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you're that worried about damaging it you can always keep it in your front pocket. It does have Bluetooth.

  5. Decent idea by Andtalath · · Score: 4, Informative

    The phone on your wrist is a decent idea which is severely flawed for several reasons.
    1: Extreme lack of space for all that needs to go in it.
    2: Lack of space to dial numbers.
    3: Kinda annoying to charge, especially due to the fact that it will need to happen often.

    Also, I fail to see how this is newsworthy, dealextreme.com offers several watch phones.
    For instance: http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.13058

    Also, the link isn't only slashdotted, the page is even suspended for using to much bandwidth.

  6. When your website in India gets slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    When your website in India gets slashdotted and you call tech support, who answers the phone?

  7. Who wears a watch? by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There needs to be a slashdot poll to see how many people still wear watches. It has to be a dwindling number. There's a clock on my celphone, there was a clock on my pager, and in the 80s I was young enough to not have to give a crap about the time of day. So I've actually never worn a watch, except for a brief period when I enjoyed owning a few pocket watches, before they were accidentally put through the washing machine.

    Who would want to wear a watch even if it was a cel phone? It's not like you can have a smartphone-sized display on it. Since my phone is also my portable web and email browser these days, it would be kinda...minimalist. A watch in the age of portable electronic devices is simply redundant.

  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. So when do I get my iWatch? by CuriousGeorgeIII · · Score: 3, Funny

    I fully expect Apple to release an iWatch. Something with a super high resolution 1/2 inch screen where I can read graphic novels, listen to mp3's, watch high definition movies, while talking to grandma on the phone and swaping recipes with her online because I deserve to be one of the elite. Oh yeah, and it comes with a minature black turtle neck and levis case so I don't scratch the screen.

  10. Another link on GD910 by fly1ngtux · · Score: 3, Informative

    As the link posted here is dead, I googled for it and found this: http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/lg-gd910-watch-phone-review/