Google Enhances Street View With User Photos
Google has launched a competitor or counterpart to Microsoft's Photosynth, which employs user-contributed photos of much-photographed sites to supplement the street-level view in an immersive way. Google's offering is called simply Navigate through User Photos, and unlike Photosynth — which requires Sliverlight and therefore is not available on Linux — is implemented in Flash. This YouTube video (also embedded at the link above) offers a quick tour of the new feature, which can use photos uploaded to Panoramico, Flickr, and Picasa.
Try Moonlight.
http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight
Run! It's a trap!
I noticed this last week sometime. My first thought when I see this technology is always "damn that's a lot of maths".
No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
did you not read the part where it says that this requires Flash?
...unlike Photosynth — which requires Sliverlight and therefore is not available on Linux — is implemented in Flash
I'm thinking of making some crack brownies that are delicious and unlike pot brownies--which have pot in them and are therefore dangerous--have crack in them.
So long to the Bing hype done at TED this year. Good idea to incorporate user-submitted photos where the Google StreetView car is not welcomed or... hated. I think as long as the quality, angle and panorama of submitted images are scrutinized for the well-being and wealth of StreetView, it won't be very long before Google has image mapped everything with a road going through it.
...so what's the next best way to data mine people's personal vacation photography? Simply invite them to freely contribute to the bigger, shadowed cause. 0_0
Note to Slashdot Editors: Apps that avoid the use of Flash are Less Evil than Apps which do not run in Linux.
And please, if you're ever unclear on any of this Good/Evil stuff, don't hesitate to ask me.
My neighbour has photos of our street from when he was a kid. I'm planning to scan them and put them up. Quite the change over the years.
I hope there's someone vetting the pics. One of the most annoying aspects of Panoramico, is that there's more than a few narcissists who post pics of things like "our dog Benji at the beach," rather than an informative pic that will enhance the Google Earth user-experience.
Still... if no-one is vetting the pics, there is a LOT of fun to be had with this.
Good luck trying to use these features on your iPad. So much for multiplatform.
Or is this something different?
I showed that link to my buddy. He responded with this link:
http://www.videosift.com/video/TED-Augmented-reality-using-Bing-maps
Which makes the google demo look like something from 1996 in comparison. (Skip ahead to the 4:20 mark for some jaw-dropping live video overlaid on top of 3D interior shots of pike place market, generated from user pics. Mix that sort of data with technology like this and with enough computing power you could probably render a decent 3D model of the habitated world in a few weeks.
moox. for a new generation.
Why not do this as an Applet, not Flash.... After all, Java is FOSS, and works on all platforms. Applets launch fast, (unless they have megabytes of Jars to load, though this problem is not just with Java).
Which makes the google demo look like something from 1996 in comparison. (Skip ahead to the 4:20 mark for some jaw-dropping live video overlaid on top of 3D interior shots of pike place market, generated from user pics.
The video you are referring to is a demo that required a guy with a camera to stream live for the presentation. Google's system actually works right now.
MS is superb at giving tech demos. They are even better at timing them to most strongly attack their opponents. But what they are awful at is delivering. Until MS gets enough cameras placed everywhere so that you can reasonably expect, even if primarily only in metropolitan areas, that they will have a camera view you can access, it's just going to be a cool gimmick that will have a camera on the Eiffel Tower, and one at Times Square, and maybe three in Seattle.
As of right now, they don't even have *one* set up anywhere.
It's fairly impressive, however, the way MS has this down to an art. They show this cool tech off, and everyone remembers how cool it is, and now existing products have to compete against an imaginary MS product that doesn't even exist and will most likely not exist any time soon.
They tried this with Surface when the iPhone debuted. That backfired, but even so, Suface, the demo, is damned cool. Surface, the reality, is a gimmick.