Slashdot Mirror


New Type of Dinosaur Unearthed

MileHighScience writes to mention that a new type of sauropod has been discovered by scientists from Utah's Brigham Young University. Dubbed Abydosaurus mcintoshi, the new addition to the long necked dinosaur family was discovered at Dinosaur National Monument. "The circumstances of its discovery were both unusual and dramatic. The researchers stumbled on four skulls in a quarry at the preserve. Two were still intact. Sauropod skulls are rarely found in the fossil record because the soft tissue from which they are constructed is unlikely to be preserved after death. 'Their heads are built lighter than mammal skulls because they sit way out at the end of very long necks,' Brooks Britt, a BYU paleontologist said in a news release. 'Instead of thick bones fused together, sauropod skulls are made of thin bones bound together by soft tissue.' Of more than 120 known species of sauropods, there have been only eight instances in which scientists have been able to recover intact skulls."

160 comments

  1. Gary Larson inquires: by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Informative

    yeah, but does it have a thagomizer?!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Gary Larson inquires: by eexaa · · Score: 1

      To me it seems like they found only the head with rest of the body bitten off. ...so probably had no thagomizer.

    2. Re:Gary Larson inquires: by Pojut · · Score: 1

      How rude! That isn't a proper question to be asking. Isaygooddaysir!

    3. Re:Gary Larson inquires: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to say, because they have several skulls and some of the vertebrae and other postcranial bits, but they don't mention anything about the tail in the paper (it's open access -- yay!). Statistically, it probably didn't have one, because only rare sauropods are known to have a thagomizer, but it's possible.

    4. Re:Gary Larson inquires: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but in the artist depiction it has a cheesy grin like a drunken Ninja Turtle.

    5. Re:Gary Larson inquires: by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      yeah, but does it have a thagomizer?!

      Well, I had to follow that link. And it's fun. I've had dealings with Ken Carpenter before, and like the guy ; picking up on a term like that sounds entirely up his street sense-of-humour-wise, and as vertebrate palaeontology isn't my particular specialism, I'm more than willing to follow his lead.
      Boringly : since sauropods typically have strongly ossified tail tendons (and correspondingly low tail flexibility), then it's very unlikely to have a thagomizer.
      The teeth were interesting though.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. I'll be damned! by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 1

    Mormon scientists have found skolls! How interesting! Maybe this will get a Darwin award.

    1. Re:I'll be damned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    2. Re:I'll be damned! by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Mormon scientists have found skolls! How interesting! Maybe this will get a Darwin award.

      Don't be silly. They dated them at 4000 years old.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    3. Re:I'll be damned! by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Mormons aren't creationists in the usual sense of the word.

    4. Re:I'll be damned! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mormons aren't creationists in the usual sense of the word.

      They're not Christian in the usual sense of the word, either.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:I'll be damned! by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      Mormons aren't creationists in the usual sense of the word.

      They're not Christian in the usual sense of the word, either.

      That depends on your definition of Christian. If you define Christian as strictly adhering to the Nicene Creed, then no, they're not. But neither are many other churches by that standard. There are more non-Trinitarian Christian churches then you'd think out there.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    6. Re:I'll be damned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess by 'usual sense of the word' you mean they don't assign a ridiculously short age to the date of Creation.

    7. Re:I'll be damned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That depends on your definition of Depends.

    8. Re:I'll be damned! by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Mormon theology is a lot different from "mainstream" Christianity than just being non-Trinitarian. Of course, mainstream Christianity isn't exactly Biblical either, for the most part...

    9. Re:I'll be damned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than that. For example, Earth formed from matter that already existed (that's official church doctrine). Most mormons believe it happened naturally (with some guidance, perhaps), so we don't necessarily disagree with scientists on anything on the subject, and there are many mormon scientists who study it.

    10. Re:I'll be damned! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 0, Troll

      OK, listen. I'm an expert on Mormonism. Why? I did a Google search an hour ago, that's why.

      Mormons don't specifically believe in either creationism or evolution. The official position of the Church is that this issue is unresolved, because God has not revealed the answer.

      An analogy can be made with birtherism. There are people who consider the certificate of live birth and the old contemporaneous newspaper article as sufficient evidence. Aside from them, there are crazy "creationist" birthers who insist the president was born in Kenya and is a citizen of Kenya, etc.

      The "Mormons" would be similar to politicians and pundits who appear on TV and answer "I have no idea" when asked if they believe the president is a citizen.

    11. Re:I'll be damned! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That depends on your definition of Christian. If you define Christian as strictly adhering to the Nicene Creed, then no, they're not.

      If you define christian as being within a country mile of protestants, catholics or eastern orthodox they still aren't.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:I'll be damned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's way more than just tritarianism. Unitarians are somewhat "non-traditional" in that regard and others, but they're more recognizably Christian. The extra prophet? The particularly philosophy of the divine? There are many very distinct features to Mormonism.

    13. Re:I'll be damned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theyre not exactly normal members of western society in the usual sense of the phrase, either.

    14. Re:I'll be damned! by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I define christianism in the way Nietzsche did it: the perversion of everything that is beautiful and sacred about the human spirit. The worship of the weak and diseased. The poisoning of life itself.

      So, yes, mormons are christians too. They fit the definition pretty well.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    15. Re:I'll be damned! by portforward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm an expert on Mormonism. I've been one all my life.

      If I may, it really depends on whom you ask. You will probably get a whole range of opinions. I would probably phrase the opinion, "Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's." I graduated from BYU, and we were taught taught evolution in Biology. Any modern study of biology without evolution would be incomplete at best and shoddy and fraudulent at worst.

      As a Mormon when we study the different accounts of the creation, we come away with three fundamental main points:

      1) Jesus Christ was the creator
      2) The creation was planned, and was effected by "organizing" pre-existing materials, not "ex-nihlo"
      3) Man was created in the image of God

      There are some things that could be interpreted as contradictions between religious belief and scientific fact. I do think about them, but I don't let myself get carried away. My current understanding of both the mind of God and science as it truly is is unfortunately flawed.

      Regardless I don't "throw out the baby with the bathwater" just because I don't understand some facet of science or religion.

    16. Re:I'll be damned! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Mormons aren't creationists in the usual sense of the word.

      They're not Christian in the usual sense of the word, either

      That's one of the nicest things I've heard anyone say about the Mormons for a long time.

      The last time I had them at the door, I was decorating and had a friend around to help. So as soon as I opened the door and saw who they were, I called out "Charlie, can you bring the rubbish bucket". Then I took the set of leaflets out of their hands, said 'thank you', threw them straight into the bucket, and shut the door on them. No need for any lip-flapping on their behalf ; no wear and tear on my ears either, and a full and frank exchange of views.
      One of my friends is far more tolerant : he'll invite them in and spend 2 or 3 hours debating science in general and palaeontology in particular with them. He's not going to be harmed by their idiocies ; they might actually be educated (most of them are woefully ignorant) ; and the time they spend in his living room is time they lose from their mission to confuse and upset average people. All-round win.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. This is my theory, which is mine. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    The following is MY theory.
    *ahem*
    *ahem* *ahem*
    This was the type of dinosaur that wore a saddle, so that people from the Bible could ride it around, and with that long neck it could have easily reached up to get the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Life for that bitch Eve. *Ahem*

    1. Re:This is my theory, which is mine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know anything about mormons?

      Moron.

    2. Re:This is my theory, which is mine. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Whoops, the forbidden fruit was on the other tree, which is a flaw in my initial theory.
      What follows is a modification of my theory. *ahem*
      *ahem ahem*
      s/Life/Knowledge of Good and Evil/

    3. Re:This is my theory, which is mine. by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      No, no... if you are going to paraphrase Cleese, you have to wait for someone to do the original quote first.* Then you can diverge from Python orthodoxy in the subsequent reply.

      It is as if you skipped the "Triple Dare" and went straight for the jugular with a "Triple Dog Dare".

      *For the uninitiated, and in the world of Slashdot there should be none, the original quote is from Anne Elk (John Cleese)

      "This theory which belongs to me is as follows. Ahem. Ahem. This is how it goes. Ahem. The next thing that I am about to say is my theory. Ahem. Ready?

      The Theory by A. Elk brackets Miss brackets.

      My theory is along the following lines. All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much MUCH thicker in the middle, and then thin again at the far end. That is the theory that I have and which is mine, and what it is too."

    4. Re:This is my theory, which is mine. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0, Troll

      New Type of Dinosaur Unearthed

      Knuckle-dragging tea baggers voting for Palin?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:This is my theory, which is mine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to elite knuckle cracking snobs who voted for Obama? How's that Hope & Change workin' out for ya? Eh?

  4. in related news by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Another dinosaur, Windowsaurus Mobelius, has also been identified in the fossil remains of early Silicon Valley users. It seems this dinosaur was replaced in its ecosystem by a smarter, faster breed called Googlesaurus Androidius, which went on to compete for resources with the Applesaurus iPhonius, which survived only as a brightly-coloured niche dinosaur, despite competing claims that its extinction was inevitable, and that its dominance was assured. Neither of these outcomes predicted for the iPhonius turned out to be true, and the Androidius eventually evolved into sentient killing machines.

    All hail, etc.

    1. Re:in related news by levell · · Score: 4, Funny

      Recent reports also note that the Nokiasuarus Maemonicus has been evolving in a new strain: Meegoasaurus Rex which prefers open spaces

      --
      Struggling to find a day everyone can make? WhenShallWe.com
    2. Re:in related news by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Let's not forget the threat from the pengui sapiens of the pokealotatwat tribe.

    3. Re:in related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abydosaurus mcintoshi, also known as the iSaur.

    4. Re:in related news by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      If we are going to talk about things that are extinct then I would suggest naming it Abydosaurus Lisasaurus instead.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    5. Re:in related news by zullnero · · Score: 1

      Sentient killing machines that are "extremely concerned about your browsing habits" and "offer you suggestions about various products it wants you to buy and websites it wants you to visit?" You got it all wrong.

      Most schools teach that Androidius evolved into Googlesaurus Chromicus, which, throwing the basic concepts of evolution to the wind, took many different shapes and sizes but ultimately couldn't optimize its own form into the perfect killing machine and ended up cannibalizing itself due to an inability to hunt prey and feed itself without falling down and hurting itself repeatedly while getting sidetracked by advertisements for its own competitors and various phishing schemes.

    6. Re:in related news by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      If we are going to talk about things that are extinct then I would suggest naming it Abydosaurus Lisasaurus instead.

      I'm not sure a stillborn mutant qualifies as an extinct species, but I suppose that's a matter of perspective. :)

    7. Re:in related news by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and it eats puny Googlesaurus Androidius and Applesaurus Iphonicus for breakfast, lunch and dinner. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  5. Brontasaurus by jimbolauski · · Score: 1, Funny

    I would call it a Brontasaurus just to add confusion.

    --
    Knowledge = Power
    P= W/t
    t=Money
    Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    1. Re:Brontasaurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Among the scientific community, it wouldn't really add much confusion, as Brontosaurus isn't actually the name of a dinosaur. It would of course make the /. community cry editor-foul when it came press release time thanks to your aforementioned "confusion".

  6. Thesaurus? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thesaurus: Small dinosaur that uses flowery language to extricate itself from dangerous situations. - Dennis Miller

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  7. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by CorporateSuit · · Score: 5, Informative

    BYU has one of the largest collection of Jurassic dino bones in the world.

    Does that not fit into what your science teacher told you about people who aren't your science teacher?

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  8. Abydosaurus mcintoshi by olsmeister · · Score: 1

    Which evolved into its much cooler offspring, iPodosaurus.

    1. Re:Abydosaurus mcintoshi by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Nope. They wore proganochelynecks.

  9. Head and neck position? by red_blue_yellow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if the low density of these skulls will affect the on-going debate about the whether or not the sauropods held their necks and heads erect or horizontally? It will be interesting to see. See here for info on the debate.

    --
    A neutral communications medium is essential. It is the basis of science, by which humankind should decide what is true.
  10. Actually by riboch · · Score: 4, Informative

    More specifically it was a U of M graduate student:
    http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537

    --
    GO BLUE!
    1. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading your entire linked article, I don't see where it says that "it was a U of M graduate student." Seems like they were all part of a team.

    2. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More specifically it was a U of M graduate student:
      http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537

      Please be clear. U of Michigan. The Universities of Minnesota and Manitoba also use "U of M". There's also the Universities of Memphis, Montana, Montreal, Moncton, and probably others, though they don't seem to use the abbreviation as frequently.

    3. Re:Actually by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Oh so it wasn't a dinosaur at all then! Still I could see how scientists could get confused by these U of M students with long necks and thin skulls....

    4. Re:Actually by riboch · · Score: 1

      My degrees are not in paleontology, but let me educate you on how this works:

      Undergraduate student/intern finds/makes something, gives to professor. Professor is collaborating with professor at another university. Professor at another university gives a graduate student some work. The student does all the leg work, finds an anomaly, reports to his professor who reports back to original professor. Because of an arrangement, the place of origin of the specimen is given publication priority.

      Chances are the lead author is the highest in the food chain.

      --
      GO BLUE!
    5. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More specifically it was a U of M graduate student:
      http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7537

      OK, I know Michigan has low admission standards. But admitting a pea-brained sauropod? Even a whole herd of those wouldn't help them beat Ohio State....

    6. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that student was a dinosaur?

  11. Abydosaurus mcintoshi is the first dinosaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That only had a one foot.

    The animal could be found in large groups, leaning against the tall conifers that were common at the time.

  12. Terminology question by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    Is this a new dinosaur or a new as in you didn't have it before BMWsaur?

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Terminology question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another question, what's a "skoll"?

  13. Nay, I am Moroni! by copponex · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The last living white skinned follower of Jesus in North America! And you have blasphemed Elohim, and are doomed to come back with darker skin!!

    Seriously. Mormons are slightly less dumb than Scientologists. That's not a compliment.

    1. Re:Nay, I am Moroni! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Well, the Anonymous Mormon has a point. Mormons did dig up this dinosaur, and in terms of mythology the Mormons are more free to dig up saddleless dinosaurs than most evangelical Christians- because the Church has taken up no position on the matter of creationism/evolution other than to say God has not revealed the answer.

      OTOH perhaps you're setting a low standard. I was watching Valkyrie last night (the one with Scientologist Tom Cruise)... you have to see it. He singlehandedly makes the whole movie hilarious. I couldn't suspend belief long enough to stop thinking "Scientologist", and his acting doesn't help at all.

    2. Re:Nay, I am Moroni! by cxx · · Score: 0

      Oh, if only they believe what you imagine they do ... the world would be a much simpler place.

      I won't bother going into too much detail here, but your comment started with a common misconception (that the followers of Christ in the Book of Mormon all had white skin, with dark skin being a curse for wickedness), ventured into the strange (using "Elohim," a name Mormons use for God, to make their beliefs all the more strange), and ended with complete nonsense (and designed to be flamebait, to boot!).

      Yes, their beliefs can be strange when exaggerated and misunderstood, but please don't try to purposefully misrepresent them like that.

    3. Re:Nay, I am Moroni! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I'm an athe^H^H^Hgnostic at this point in life, so my knowledge of Mormonism is a bit limited. Perhaps you can forgive me for these childish questions.

      Is it an exaggeration or a misunderstanding that Mormonist beliefs include Christ entering the New World? Because that alone has always struck me as the principal strangeness. I mean, look at all the water in the way. [...Thinks...] OK, I know it's already been set up so that he can walk right across it, which itself is very strange indeed, but it's a given at the end of the first book. [...Thinks...] Still, that's like a month long walk. He'd have nothing to eat. And he did need to eat, because he was at the Last Supper, and it's not like he was a waiter for his apostles. [...Thinks...] Well, I guess he could do the loaves and fishes trick. There would be plenty of fish for him to catch, and he could make the bread from himself, along with a nice wine to go with it. [...Thinks...] Except no wine glass to hold it in. and where does he sleep? [...Thinks...] Actually I have never heard any Biblical references to His sleep patterns anywhere, and this was after the Resurrection, so he was probably jet lagged. [...Thinks...] Did he actually walk here like a normal person, or did he get here via some Star Trek transporter-like miracle? That would solve everything.

      [...ducks...]

    4. Re:Nay, I am Moroni! by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Still, that's like a month long walk. He'd have nothing to eat. And he did need to eat, because he was at the Last Supper, and it's not like he was a waiter for his apostles. [...Thinks...] Well, I guess he could do the loaves and fishes trick. There would be plenty of fish for him to catch, and he could make the bread from himself, along with a nice wine to go with it.

      No, see, he can only do the loaves-and-fishes trick and the water-into-wine trick if he can get everyone to turn around first.

      See, 'cause if they were looking directly at the miracle when it happened, they could go blind...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    5. Re:Nay, I am Moroni! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      See, 'cause if they were looking directly at the miracle when it happened, they could go blind...

      So, the miracle of the loaves and fishes involved masturbation? I was looking for a way to make that whole thing even creepier...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by CorporateSuit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like to read, and unlike the rest of my classmates, I have some scientific background concerning the world in general. And thus, when I heard that BYU, founded on principles of racism, moral superiority, and hatred of atheists, I was surprised they had abandoned enough of their core principles to have a paleontology department that accurately dated fossils.

    Apparently, you shouldn't believe everything that you read, or is just it a personal bias that makes you lash out so?

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  15. Science in Utah? by wintercolby · · Score: 0, Troll

    Do they also believe it lived alongside man?

    --
    Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Science in Utah? by rjolley · · Score: 1

      It's not just Utah, it's Utah COUNTY. A section of Utah every normal person here wishes would just go away.

    2. Re:Science in Utah? by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Mormons aren't creationists in the usual sense of the word..

    3. Re:Science in Utah? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Actually it did live alongside man, but man was a small rodentlike creature at the time.

    4. Re:Science in Utah? by wintercolby · · Score: 1

      In light of this article I contest my modding as Troll. It only makes sense to question how likely anything scientific comes from the state, and make light of the fact that opinions have also come from the state that had a right wing/religious bias.

      The problem is when the legistlature of the state has recently released an opinion that completely goes against commonly accepted scientific principle, it is reasonable to question the likelihood of anything scientific coming from the state.

      --
      Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
    5. Re:Science in Utah? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Actually it did live alongside man, but man was a small rodentlike creature at the time.

      65 million years ago, my great-great grandpa scurried under a rock to avoid a dinosaur. Yesterday, I scraped droppings off my car from that dino's great-great grandson.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:Science in Utah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except your comment didn't make any sense. BYU != Utah legislature. Mormons aren't even creationists, so if you were trying to make a joke, it wasn't funny.

    7. Re:Science in Utah? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Except your comment didn't make any sense. BYU != Utah legislature. Mormons aren't even creationists, so if you were trying to make a joke, it wasn't funny.

      Yes! We demand strict factual accuracy in all humor! It is impossible for something to be funny unless it is entirely true! The inclusion of any untrue information in a joke automatically negates any humor which may have been contained within.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  16. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    But archeologically, the cretaceous "wild west", and the cretaceous "space age" would be in the same strata, even if they were a thousand times farther apart than our similar eras. However, I doubt you'd find either. Saddles would have rotted away over the millions of years, and all of the space ships were used to get as many as possible off planet before the Chicxulub event.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  17. This is really rare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The researchers stumbled on four skulls"

    I never heard of a four headed sauropod before!

  18. Skolls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sauropod skolls are rarely found in the fossil record because the soft tissue from which they are constructed is unlikely to be preserved after death."

    Correction. They are rarely found because nobody quite knows what a "skoll" is.

    1. Re:Skolls? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      "Sauropod skolls are rarely found in the fossil record because the soft tissue from which they are constructed is unlikely to be preserved after death."

      Correction. They are rarely found because nobody quite knows what a "skoll" is.

      It's a kind of chewing tobacco, right?

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  19. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most mormons aren't creationists in the usual sense of the word. There isn't actually any official doctrine on the subject (most quotes that you find probably aren't official doctrine), and as far as mormon beliefs go, it doesn't matter. They believe what they feel comfortable with. Most will tell you that God works in natural ways, meaning that maybe he guides things a little, but he lets nature do stuff for him. In mormon doctrine, there is plenty of room for both science and religion. We're all about education and learning about how the world works. I don't believe in "magic," but science that we don't yet understand. Surely it's possible that God uses quantum mechanics, > 3 dimensional physics, and other things that we are only beginning to grasp.

  20. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

    Maybe one day their students will be allowed to grow beards and have private sex lives.

    Not to mention a cup of coffee.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
  21. Right into the trap... by copponex · · Score: 5, Informative

    "I hope to see an Academy established in Provo that shall do honor to our Territory, and at which the children of the Latter-day Saints can receive a good education unmixed with the pernicious atheistic influences that are found in so many of the higher schools of the country." -Brigham Young

    But, you got me on one point. There is a process for "beard exemption":

    A student who wishes to obtain a beard exception must visit a BYU Student Health Center doctor by appointment (422.5156). The doctor will fax his recommendation. The student then needs to come to the Honor Code Office to fill out some paperwork and receive the letter allowing the growth of the beard, if approved. If a yearly beard exception is granted, a new Student ID will be issued after the beard has been fully grown, and must be renewed every year by repeating the process.

    http://honorcode.byu.edu/content/what-process-obtaining-beard-waiver

    That's literally the funniest thing I have read in the last 24 hours.

    But wait! There's more!

    Are Mixed Gender Camping Trips allowed?
    http://honorcode.byu.edu/content/mixed-gender

    Fear of Gays!
    Homosexual behavior and/or advocacy of homosexual behavior are inappropriate and violate the Honor Code. Homosexual behavior includes not only sexual relations between members of the same sex, but all forms of physical intimacy that give expression to homosexual feelings. Advocacy includes seeking to influence others to engage in homosexual behavior or promoting homosexual relations as being morally acceptable.

    Fear of the Female Body!
    A clean and well-cared-for appearance should be maintained. Clothing is inappropriate when it is sleeveless, strapless, backless, or revealing; has slits above the knee; or is form fitting. Dresses, skirts, and shorts must be knee-length or longer. Hairstyles should be clean and neat, avoiding extremes in styles or colors. Excessive ear piercing (more than one per ear) and all other body piercing are not acceptable. Shoes should be worn in all public campus areas.

    Forced religion!
    Students are required to be in good Honor Code standing to be admitted to, continue enrollment at, and graduate from BYU. In conjunction with this requirement, all enrolled continuing undergraduate, graduate, intern, and Study Abroad students are required to obtain a Continuing Student Ecclesiastical Endorsement for each new academic year. Students must have their endorsements completed, turned in, and processed by the Honor Code Office before they can register for fall semester or any semester thereafter. To avoid registration delays, endorsement should be submitted to the Honor Code Office by March 15. Those applying to BYU should use the new-student Admissions Application Part 3 endorsement and submit to Admissions, D-155 ASB.

    I mean, this shit sounds like something you'd find the Taliban advocating. Read it for yourself:
    http://saas.byu.edu/catalog/2009-2010ucat/GeneralInfo/HonorCode.php#HCOfficeInvovement

    1. Re:Right into the trap... by EL_mal0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You must have some grudge against the LDS church to be trolling so much on this thread. Nevertheless, I'm going to respond to a couple of your points.

      First point: the beard thing. I agree, this is pretty lame. The dress and grooming standards have changed over the years, and hopefully one day neatly trimmed beards will be allowed. I've heard that the anti-beard regulations came about in the 60's when the hippies wore beards, and were thought of as some sort of representation of the counter culture, which doesn't really jive with LDS doctrines. Times have changed. I must say, though, that if that's the funniest thing you've read in the last 24 hours, you must be starved for entertainment.

      Second point: mixed gender field trips. They are allowed, you just need to make sure the men and women aren't sharing tents. As you probably know, premarital sex is against LDS doctrine. This is a small measure to ensure students aren't breaking the rules while on official business. Dress and grooming standards are along this same line.

      Third point: "fear" of gays. BYU is a church school. LDS doctrine states that homosexuality is bad, so the church's school isn't going to allow anybody to encourage behavior that goes against church doctrine.

      Fourth point: Ecclesiastical endorsements. BYU is a church school. They strive for a religious, education along side the more secular one. There is no requirement that you be a practicing member of ANY particular religion, just that you get "cleared" from your own ecclesiastical leader. If you don't belong to any particular church (presumably even if you're an atheist) you can meet with LDS leaders to get an endorsemnt. This is mainly to ensure that the students will abide by the school's honor code, which you find so humorous and offensive.

      I'm a graduate of the BYU geology department. I got a fantastic education that prepared me well for grad school and a career in science. I am happy to see the department get this press. I'm less happy at douche bags like yourself using this platform to spread half-truths and misinformation about my alma mater. If you don't like the standards, nobody's going to force you to live them, or even go near the BYU campus.

    2. Re:Right into the trap... by copponex · · Score: 3, Interesting

      a term you clearly picked to deprave those you obviously don't understand

      No disagreement there. Being terrified of women and certain styles of grooming and atheists and homosexuals is certainly something I don't understand. And I say terrified, since they aren't allowed to be any of those things near the "clean" students at BYU. All, of course, except for the beards. I guess beards aren't so scary.

      Never do they force others to be their religion, or to be a member of any other.

      You didn't read. It's important:

      LDS students may be endorsed only by the bishop of the ward (1) in which they live and (2) that holds their current Church membership record.

      Non-LDS students are to be endorsed by (1) the local ecclesiastical leader if the student is an active member of the congregation, (2) the bishop of the LDS ward in which they currently reside, or (3) the nondenominational BYU chaplain.

      So, how does an atheist stay within the honor code?

    3. Re:Right into the trap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is that YOU apply to go to BYU of your own free will. if YOU don't like the honor code, rules, ideology, or standards simply don't apply. No one is forcing you to be there. The article submission was meant to be scientifict yet you have turned this into a platform for expression your own bigotry and intollerance. And here I thought this site attracted the intellectually gifted bunch.

    4. Re:Right into the trap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either number 2 or 3. You're making this harder than it is.

    5. Re:Right into the trap... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, it's not fear

      You may be right. "Hatred" of gays, women, and athiests might be more precise.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Right into the trap... by MaxEmerika · · Score: 1

      Slamming the BYU honor code is funny, but a little OT. Mormons are Biblical literalists who believe that the earth was created 6000 years ago. That makes this discovery, and the fact that BYU has such a large collection of fossils to begin with, deeply ironic.

    7. Re:Right into the trap... by cxx · · Score: 0

      LDS students may be endorsed only by the bishop of the ward (1) in which they live and (2) that holds their current Church membership record.

      Translation: If you're a member of the church, go see your bishop.

      Non-LDS students are to be endorsed by (1) the local ecclesiastical leader if the student is an active member of the congregation, (2) the bishop of the LDS ward in which they currently reside, or (3) the nondenominational BYU chaplain.

      Translation: If you're not a member, go find any one of those three people to get an endorsement.

      That person will hold a short interview and basically ask if you will live by the school's honor code. Say yes, and you have your endorsement.

      Here's the specific form: Ecclesiastical Endorsement. Please feel free to ignore the parts specific to LDS applicants.

      As I said, there's no requirement to be religious (only a statement "encouraging" non-LDS students to attend their respective religious services). Think of it like marriage: you don't have to go do a church to get married (although that's what religious people do), just go to the county building and sign a form or two.

      But I don't think your problem is with the application process or with religion in itself: it's with the rules and regulations that go with being a BYU student.

      You know what? That's fine: not even all "Mormons" want (or have to) live by those rules: I even know some that have a (gasp!) beard! They just go elsewhere for school, and nobody thinks the lesser of them.

    8. Re:Right into the trap... by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      No one forces you to apply to or attend public universities either, right? Does BYU accept any federal or state funding?

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    9. Re:Right into the trap... by weiserfireman · · Score: 1

      Mormons are "bibical literalists". We believe bible to be true "as far as it was translated correctly".

      Most LDS people I know, believe that the universe was created using some unknown process that took an undeterminate amount of time. The 6 "days" could be retranslated in to 6 stages of creation.

      From the founding of our church, we have been instructed to learn as much about science as we can.

    10. Re:Right into the trap... by SirWinston · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >And they certainly don't advocate killing others to enforce
      >what they believe.

      Really? They did comparatively recently:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Meadows_massacre

      I for one would never support any religion capable of such an atrocity, much less one which would conspire at all levels to cover it up instead of seeking forgiveness and making reparations. The world would be a much better place if primitive religions were treated as the bunkum they are. Why tax fuels, carbon, tobacco, or alcohol, when the real danger is the superstition and intolerance emanating from the pulpit? We should be taxing churches instead of making them tax-exempt.

      >Feel free to compare them to Islam if you like (and there's
      >some interesting comparisons there)... but drawing on the
      >Taliban? Come on!

      Hmm, Mormons and the Taliban... They both hate gays, check. They each treat women as subordinate to men, check. They each have a history of violent intolerance of outsiders, check. They both have a bizarre fixation on facial hair, check. They both use religious schools to indoctrinate the young, check. They both dictate special clothing (burqas, sacred underwear), check.

      Yep, Mormons (and other intolerant fundamentalist sects) are the American Taliban.

      --
      "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."--Andrew Jackson
    11. Re:Right into the trap... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      So .... Taliban Light?

      New school motto:

      When you want all of the religious extremism, with none of the pesky beheadings, try Taliban Light (tm)!

    12. Re:Right into the trap... by MaxEmerika · · Score: 1

      If so, then it's changed quite a bit since I was a kid. My seminary teachers treated me like a Satanist because I accepted evolution without apology.

    13. Re:Right into the trap... by weiserfireman · · Score: 1

      depends on when you were a kid, and who your seminary teachers were.

      I am 43. Most people in the Church accept evolution as a tool that God might use, but don't accept the evolution of Man.

    14. Re:Right into the trap... by MaxEmerika · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm 35 and grew up just north of Salt Lake City. At the time, I didn't know a single, solitary person--not one--who believed in evolution. I was taught repeatedly that the stories in the Bible (Garden of Eden, Noah's Flood, David and Goliath, pillars of salt, the whole bit) were historical facts, and that if I couldn't accept that, I couldn't be a Mormon. I eventually left Mormonism for a host reasons, but the whole attitude towards reality sure didn't help. I'm glad others have had better experiences.

    15. Re:Right into the trap... by weiserfireman · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that. I'm in Idaho, in a town that wasn't settled by Mormons

      I know the type of people you are talking about though. Most of them would be nuts about their reliegion if they were Baptist, Moslem, or Budhist though.

    16. Re:Right into the trap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is about as off-topic as off-topic can be. But nonetheless, that wikipedia article you cited to support your position that Mormons have a "violent history" doesn't support your position very well. When I got down to the section that discusses Brigham Young's involvement (and thus official involvement of "the Church") in the massacre, it appears that the massacre may likely have been merely the unsanctioned actions of several people who were Mormons. Just some angry Mormons. There is no solid evidence that "the Church" participated in the massacre at all.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Meadows_massacre#Alleged_involvement_of_Brigham_Young

      That's like saying the Mormon church sanctions bank robbery because a rogue Mormon--Butch Cassidy--robbed banks.

      http://www.utah.com/oldwest/butch_cassidy.htm

    17. Re:Right into the trap... by chickenarise · · Score: 1

      Third point: "fear" of gays. BYU is a church school. LDS doctrine states that homosexuality is bad, so the church's school isn't going to allow anybody to encourage behavior that goes against church doctrine.

      Oh, I see. So prejudice is OK if the church says so. Gotcha.

      --
      One convenient locations...in Africa.
    18. Re:Right into the trap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And they certainly don't advocate killing others to enforce
      >what they believe.

      Really? They did comparatively recently:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Meadows_massacre

      You show an ignorance in regards to the Mountain Meadows Massacre. That caravan was not killed because they wouldn't convert, BUT because several members of the caravan made threats (including a threat to return and help the US Army exterminate the Mormons). Other members of the caravan bragged about being members of the "Missouri Wildcats" - the gang which killed Joseph and Hyrum Smith.

      You also forget that the Church never authorized the massacre, but the messenger from Brigham Young arrived in southern Utah two days too late.

    19. Re:Right into the trap... by A.+Bosch · · Score: 1

      Agh, where's my mod points? I totally agree with you. For more fun reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Under_the_Banner_of_Heaven

      --
      Where there is the necessary technical skill to move mountains, there is no need for the faith that moves mountains.
    20. Re:Right into the trap... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Constant delusions and hallucinations are harmful. This guys are constantly delusional. They should be put away. I hear you calling this stuff "religion". I don't know the definition of that word ... "religion". Regardless of how you want to name it, this is nothing but a psychotic disorder,and it should be dealt with accordingly. Allowing this delusional minds to run a school, is negligent at best, and probably even criminal.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    21. Re:Right into the trap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are an atheist why would you even want to go to BYU? I know it's a great place to get an education but there are a lot of other great universities too. You can always to to the University of Utah where there is not an honor code like BYU's, if you really want to go to school in Utah.

      BYU is a private religious university. (Most) students there are not afraid of "certain styles of grooming and atheists and homosexuals" (you can be homosexual and go to BYU - I've known at least one - you just cannot be a 'practicing' homosexual), they just disagree with them. Last time I checked someone is allowed to disagree with what someone does or believes and not hate them or be afraid of them.

    22. Re:Right into the trap... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      BULLSHIT. Religion should be treated without exceptions.

      If you believe that ALIEN are out there, and wear a TINFOIL hat everywhere, BAM! in the nuthouse you go!
      if you believe that GOD is out there, and wear a KIPPAH hat everywhere, BAM! to the funny house with you too!

      Why should we make this differeces? Religions are no different from delirium tremend, and should be treated with anti-psychotics too!

      And anyone defending this criminally insane people should be executed on sight.

      Damn you people. It's 2010 already. how much longer are you going to pretend that religion is OK?

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    23. Re:Right into the trap... by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      You obviously have already formed strong opinions, but hopefully you consider these points:

      1. It's interesting how people get so fixated on the Mountain Meadows massacre when that pales in comparison to the number of Mormons killed during the extermination order given by Boggs, the Haun's Mill massacre, the evacuation of Far West, and the subsequent push westward. That doesn't at all make Mountain Meadows massacre right, but it does help keep things in perspective.

      2. Young did not order the attack but launched an investigation after the massacre. At least Haight and Lee were excommunicated. To use the Mountain Meadows massacre as an example in hopes to prove that Mormons somehow "secretly" endorse murder is desperate or at least naive.

      3. The Mormon church does not "hate gays." Individual mormons could hate gays just like some individual evangelicals, Catholics or atheists may, but the Church continues to endorse the idea of loving one's neighbors and enemies. It is true that homosexuality is one of the more grievous sins (punishable by death under the old law), and for that reason gay people must necessarily repent before they be can hold any position of leadership, for example. Given the Mormon view that homosexuality is a sin, what you view as intolerance of the Church would really be the intolerance God has for sin. Of course, the grace of Christ provides everyone the opportunity to repent, so it's not like anyone is excluded. In other words, anyone who doesn't enter the Church does so by choice, not because they were excluded. God Himself will judge all; the Church itself makes no determination of the state of any person's "afterlife." Of course, repentance is literally turning away from sin, and everyone is capable of doing that if they will. Your view of a "tolerant" church without standards where anything and everything goes may make you feel good because it's easy, but I personally am not interested in religion which doesn't push me to be better. Judeo-christianity has always been about taking up one's cross and striving to be better. Christ's preaching of "repentance" would have been pointless had the Church He and the apostles established been "tolerant" according to your definition.

      Just some thoughts.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    24. Re:Right into the trap... by Pastis · · Score: 1

      offtopic...

      To me, gay and other sexual behaviors are easily explainable by life itself. There's (almost never) pure 0 and 1 in nature, especially as soon as one start aggregating low level molecules. There's always a wide range of options in between. This yields for both a microscopic physical level as well as macroscopic ones and everything in between. Thus the wide range of sexual _behaviors_.

      Note: that's my reasoning and I don't ask anyone to agree with it.

    25. Re:Right into the trap... by randyleepublic · · Score: 0

      It says >> Abstain from alcoholic beverages, tobacco, tea, coffee, and *substance abuse*

      So you can't have a cup of coffee, (evah!), but as long as you only hit the crack pipe every once in a while, that's not abuse, so it's OK.

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
    26. Re:Right into the trap... by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      BYU is a church school

      Those words should never be used in the same sentence.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    27. Re:Right into the trap... by granitefist · · Score: 1

      The difference between the Taliban and the Mormons is that the Mormons allow others to "worship how, where, and what they may". You conveniently leave out that to attend BYU is a choice, not an imposition. Being a private university, they are free to decide on their educational environment.

      Fear of gays? Hardly. A statement that homosexual behavior is unacceptable at the university.

      Fear of the female body? Hardly. A statement of reverence for the beauty of the female body and a statement that modesty is an important show of respect.

      Forced religion? Hardly. A statement that belief in God is an important part of the educational experience.

      If you find that this kind of educational environment is too restrictive, you're welcome to attend another school. And, by the way, there would be plenty of Mormons who would agree with you. But you're missing out on a world-class education that can be offered at a fraction of the cost of other universities.

    28. Re:Right into the trap... by granitefist · · Score: 1

      I for one would never support any religion capable of such an atrocity.

      The Mountain Meadows Massacre was performed by individuals acting unilaterally without the sanction of their religion.

      It's not religion that enables terrorism. It's cowardice. And that can be found inside or outside religion.

  22. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they have them set up next to a statue of Fred Flintstone.

  23. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by cxx · · Score: 0

    And thus, when I heard that BYU, founded on principles of racism, moral superiority, and hatred of atheists, I was surprised they had abandoned enough of their core principles to have a paleontology department that accurately dated fossils.

    Strange, nothing I read from here, here, or here say anything about these "core priniciples."

    It's quite interesting to see how many times scientific discoveries from BYU are discussed here on slashdot. Even more amazing is how ignorant slashdot readers are of the school and its students.

  24. iPhonius extinction theory by syousef · · Score: 1

    iPhonius developed a distaste for most boobies, with the exception of a few big name boobies like Playboyius Boobius. This contributed greatly to it's decline, despite the abundance of it's primary food source childus Improvishedus.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:iPhonius extinction theory by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      iPhonius developed a distaste for most boobies, with the exception of a few big name boobies like Playboyius Boobius. This contributed greatly to it's

      parser error

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    2. Re:iPhonius extinction theory by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it developed a distaste for anything female, except its own growing femininity. And its primary food source was a early biped called Homo Erotica Bubblus Distortensis Realitis. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  25. This *should* be offtopic, but... by weston · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Headline: Blanket assumption based more on stereotype than actual familiarity turns out to be untrue. Film at 11.

    A lot of people seem to think that theology/cosmology is inherently constraining when it comes to serious scientific work, and I suppose the output those like the Intelligent Design crowd does a lot to reinforce that, but my experience suggests that there's no shortage of religious people who excel in scientific and technical fields, who accept the standards of those fields whether or not they seem to conflict with religious beliefs on some point, and do solid work -- even groundbreaking work.

    Some of that experience is directly with BYU, where I've found that most of the science faculty is inline with broader scientific views... for example, by and large they conclude that evolution is the best framework for studying biology and believe that's how most of life on earth came to be in its given state. And that even if you like to think of yourself as a smart person and come complete with various metrics outside of two standard deviations to prove it, there are probably Mormons who are in fact as smart or smarter than you by those metrics. It's certainly true for me. And they take the idea of scholarship and professionalism pretty seriously.

    There are certainly counterexamples; I've met people with a certain kind of view-rigidity characterized by a general literalism and intolerance for ambiguity who I believe are blinded by their cosmology/theology. But then again, my observation is that this isn't a problem limited to the religious or religion, and based on the shallowly dismissive attitude in the parent poster's post, it seems likely he's amongst the afflicted.

    1. Re:This *should* be offtopic, but... by copponex · · Score: 1

      There are certainly counterexamples; I've met people with a certain kind of view-rigidity characterized by a general literalism and intolerance for ambiguity who I believe are blinded by their cosmology/theology. But then again, my observation is that this isn't a problem limited to the religious or religion, and based on the shallowly dismissive attitude in the parent poster's post, it seems likely he's amongst the afflicted.

      I can state that horses, swine, cattle, chariots, iron swords, silk, and Jews did not exist in America before it's colonization by Europeans in the 16th Century. Can your colleagues at BYU agree with those statements?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Mormon_anachronisms

      The point is not whether a religious person can perform good science - the scientific method eliminates the importance of the background of the scientist. The question is whether you can have a seriously open academic discussion at BYU. The answer is, yes of course! As long as it doesn't clash with the beliefs of a certain church.

      In my opinion, that does far more harm than good.

    2. Re:This *should* be offtopic, but... by weston · · Score: 1

      I can state that horses, swine, cattle, chariots, iron swords, silk, and Jews did not exist in America before it's colonization by Europeans in the 16th Century. Can your colleagues at BYU agree with those statements?

      I can't speak specifically to those statements, as most of the acquaintances I have aren't in that field. I haven't really cared enough to dig into related questions or Mormon apologia. Most of the Mormon academics I'm acquainted with seem to either feel there exist justifications/answers for challenges like this, or believe their experiences with the faith are as epistemologically trustworthy as modern statements about pre-colonial Americas. Others disagree. That's fine with me; I'm not here to prove that Mormons are correct. I'm here to tell you that if you generally classify research done by Mormons as unintelligent and lacking then you're wrong.

      The answer is, yes of course! As long as it doesn't clash with the beliefs of a certain church.

      Apparently this happens less often than you might expect. If the reports of my acquaintances are correct, academic freedom isn't a particular problem except in certain political/sociological areas. There's a general understanding that BYU is definitely not the place to be if your field is, say, postmodern literature with an emphasis on feminist theory, or if you want to explore darkly violent theater, or focus on sociology of homosexuality, so, I wouldn't go to BYU to work on these things. I don't think anyone is really surprised. Similarly, I wouldn't go to the University of Chicago to study certain kinds of economics. The university politics are apparently generally not worse, just different.

  26. Here you go by copponex · · Score: 1

    I hope to see an Academy established in Provo that shall do honor to our Territory, and at which the children of the Latter-day Saints can receive a good education unmixed with the pernicious atheistic influences that are found in so many of the higher schools of the country. -Brigham Young

    Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African Race? If the White man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so. -Brigham Young

    I am here to answer. I shall be on hand to answer when I am called upon, for all the counsel and for all the instruction that I have given to this people. If there is an Elder here, or any member of this Church, called the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who can bring up the first idea, the first sentence that I have delivered to the people as counsel that is wrong, I really wish they would do it; but they cannot do it, for the simple reason that I have never given counsel that is wrong; this is the reason. -Brigham Young

  27. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by caseih · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like you haven't read very much on the subject that was accurate.

    Theologically, Mormons are not creationists in the same sense as evangelical Christians. Mormons do not believe in creation ex nihilo. Nor do Mormons hold to a literal 6 24-hour days creation, or that the earth is only 6000 years old. Creation came about over millions of years through natural processes, which science is doing an admiral job discovering. Since Mormons believe that human agency is the most important part of existence, then it makes sense that all of creation can come about and be explained without seeing or knowing God. There are no signatures on glaciers. No one is forced to believe in God. To say otherwise (like the intelligent designer folks) is to say that God is weak, meaning that if his works can be explained or understood through processes and principles, then he cannot be God.

    Religion deals more with why, not how. Thus to Mormons, there should be no conflict between belief and science. And officially, the LDS church has no position on evolution either. Most LDS scientists recognize it as a principle of nature, and various leaders throughout the last 100 years or so have stated their personal opinions that evolution is not wrong.

    Anyway, the bones are there and they have been dated. Mormons accept this and the science behind palaeontology, and study it, enjoy dinosaur museums, and even wonder what the Bonneville Lake was like back in the day.

  28. I call BS by srussia · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://honorcode.byu.edu/content/what-process-obtaining-beard-waiver

    I mean, this shit sounds like something you'd find the Taliban advocating.

    I find it hard to believe that the Taliban are anti-beard. In fact:Taliban religious police jail beard-trimmers for 10 days

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
    1. Re:I call BS by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to believe that the Taliban are anti-beard.

      You misunderstand. He's not saying that mormons are similar to the taliban because they don't allow beards. He's saying they're similar because they agree that women are property and should be covered, gays should be shunned, and nobody should be allowed to make decisions for themselves outside of their strict religious teachings.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  29. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by RDW · · Score: 1

    'BYU has one of the largest collection of Jurassic dino bones in the world.'

    Absolutely! In fact, groundbreaking research from Utah published earlier this month has overturned established theories of dinosaur posture and locomotion:

    http://www.theonion.com/content/news_briefs/paleontologists_weve_been

    Unfortunately, certain questions remain unanswered:

    http://www.theonion.com/content/news/dinosaurs_sadly_extinct_before

  30. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Theologically, Mormons are not creationists in the same sense as evangelical Christians.

    You are correct that Mormons and Christians have little in common in regard to theology.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  31. Where is the half-truth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm less happy at douche bags like yourself using this platform to spread half-truths and misinformation about my alma mater.

    So what part of the OP's post is actually a half-truth or misinformation? Your post does not dispute any of the facts in the OP's comment and just excuses the behaviour as "BYU is a church school". The original post basically contains quotes from the BYU student procedures yet you feel that the text of this code somehow makes BYU look bad and so needs to be excused. Perhaps you ought to be asking yourself why you feel that way?

    1. Re:Where is the half-truth? by EL_mal0 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I know that, as an AC, you're unlikely to read this, but oh well. First, your question about what are half-truths: the part of a previous post where copponex stated the school was founded on principles of "racism, moral superiority, and hatred of atheists". Okay, so he produced a quote that might be interpreted as supporting the school being founded as a response to an atheist education. But the other two?

      Citing the dress and grooming standards as being there because church members "fear" the female body? That's disingenuous, at best. And his point about "forced religion" is just false. Yes, you must get an endorsement from an ecclesiastical leader, basically stating that you are willing to abide by the school's regulations, but that's hardly forced religion. And I think that the fact that it's a church school is very relevant and excuses seemingly odd behavior like the dress and grooming standards. The church owns the school, and all who go there either agree to abide by the rules the church sets up, or goes elsewhere for their education.

      And yes, the poster quoted parts of the honor code, but took them a little out of context and spun them in a way that did make BYU look bad. I valued my time there, and feel a need to right a perceived wrong.

    2. Re:Where is the half-truth? by copponex · · Score: 3, Informative

      But the other two?

      Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African Race? If the White man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so. -Brigham Young

      I am here to answer. I shall be on hand to answer when I am called upon, for all the counsel and for all the instruction that I have given to this people. If there is an Elder here, or any member of this Church, called the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who can bring up the first idea, the first sentence that I have delivered to the people as counsel that is wrong, I really wish they would do it; but they cannot do it, for the simple reason that I have never given counsel that is wrong; this is the reason. -Brigham Young

      Read on! Enlightenment awaits...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Mormon_anachronisms

    3. Re:Where is the half-truth? by EL_mal0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You posted that elsewhere, but I missed the part where BYU was founded on those principles.

  32. I predict a miraculous revelation.... by copponex · · Score: 1

    No grudges. I just think the LDS is a fascinating study in human credulity. And BYU, being the official college of LDS, represents a sea of irony.

    Would you have allowed to write a paper on the total lack of evidence for Nephytes in North America in the 5th and 6th centuries? I highly doubt it. Would you be allowed to state unequivocally that the LDS was institutionally racist in the 50s, and that the "revelation" received by the leaders in 1978 was obviously political and not spiritual?

    So there will be another revelation about women in the church, since they are still second class citizens. And then another about homosexuals, and perhaps another for transgender. It just baffles me that the civilizing of the LDS isn't commented upon, or that any person trying to learn something would choose a school inexorably intertwined with such obviously flawed ideals.

    1. Re:I predict a miraculous revelation.... by weiserfireman · · Score: 1

      As a single LDS Man,

      I would suggest that women are not 2nd class citizens in the LDS Church. It is the older single men who are 2nd class citizens. I won't go into the details, but because I am not married, I am not allowed to serve in any position of authority in the Church.

    2. Re:I predict a miraculous revelation.... by EL_mal0 · · Score: 1

      Okay, you have a point that there are some academic freedom issues at BYU, especially in the humanities. You likely would get at least a good talking to if you wrote a paper about the archeological evidence against the Book of Mormon. (There is some archeological evidence supporting the Book or Mormon, but it is rather shaky.)

      I think that you could probably get away with writing a paper about the political climate surrounding the 1978 revelation granting blacks the priesthood. While the climate surrounding the revelation (or "revelation" if you prefer) may have been political, those involved in the decision certainly thought that the revelation itself was more than just a savvy political decision. Link

      And LDS women as second class citizens? I've never fully understood that attitude.

      One more thing: sorry about the douche bag comment. A little caught up in the moment.

    3. Re:I predict a miraculous revelation.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a single LDS Man,

      I would suggest that women are not 2nd class citizens in the LDS Church. It is the older single men who are 2nd class citizens. I won't go into the details, but because I am not married, I am not allowed to serve in any position of authority in the Church.

      If you get married you CAN hold those positions of authority. Married or not, females CAN NOT hold a position of authority in the LDS religion, making them second class members. Unless you are implying they are 3rd class citizens? That could also be true.

    4. Re:I predict a miraculous revelation.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you leave the Church, then? Why be part of an organization that tells you you're not worth anything?

    5. Re:I predict a miraculous revelation.... by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      As a single LDS Man,

      I would suggest that women are not 2nd class citizens in the LDS Church. It is the older single men who are 2nd class citizens. I won't go into the details, but because I am not married, I am not allowed to serve in any position of authority in the Church.

      http://scriptures.lds.org/en/titus/1/6

      Apparently there is a reason. People in leadership positions should portray the ideals of the Church, and that includes a wife and faithful kids. Yeah, it's a matter image, probably in hopes that the lay clergy will not be a stumbling block for anyone. As a single person, I'm not bothered by it. I doubt I'd enjoy any calling better than teaching Sunday school anyway.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
  33. Abydosaurus mcintoshi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Macintoshi? Is Apple nowadays even into dinosaurs?
    Well, at least I bet they didn't wear turtlenecks...

  34. New or just previously undiscovered? by hyades1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Soft head...tiny brain...a Paleoconservative, no doubt.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  35. Brigham Young's science quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For example, Brigham Young's lunatic ramblings about how he believes that minerals 'grow' like plants or hair on a person's head.

    Also crazy stuff about his belief that adobe is vastly superior to stone as a building material because adobe will mature into something strong, but stone has already matured, so now that it's mature, the next step is for it to decay.

    He tells us that the Egyptian monuments built of stone are all gone, but the ones built of mud and straw are still here.

    Guess he's never been to Egypt.

    "Let the practical chemist make his observations upon a portionof the matter of which this earth is composed; and he will find, that justas quick as it is at its perfection, that very instant it begins to decompose.We have proof of this. Go into Egypt, for instance, and you will find themonuments, towers, and pyramids, that were erected in the days of Joseph,and before he was sold into Egypt; they were built of what we call adobies,clay mixed up with straw; these fabrics, which have excited interest forso many ages, and are the wonder of modern nations, were built of this rawmaterial. They have bid defiance to the wear of ages, and they still remain.But you cannot find a stone column that was reared in those times, for theyare all decayed. Here we have actual proof that the matter which is thefurthest advanced to a state of perfection, is the first to decompose, andgo back into its native element, at which point it begins to be organizedagain, it begins to congeal, petrify, and harden into rock, which growslike a tree, but not so perceptibly."

    "Gold and silver grow, and so does every other kind of metal, the sameas the hair upon my head, or the wheat in the field; they do not grow asfast, but they are all the time composing or decomposing."

    -- Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol-1

    http://journalofdiscourses.org/Vol_01/refJDvol1-36.html

    Not content with proclaiming these brilliant pieces of geological wisdom, Brigham Young goes on to tell us that God plays hide-and-seek with gold and silver mines.

    "Ask the brethren why they do this, and the ready reply will be, 'Is it not my privilege to find af gold mine or a silver mine as well as others?' As far as I am concerned I would say, 'Yes, certainly it is your privilege, if you can find one.' But do you know how to find such ha mine? No, you do not, These treasures that are in the earth are carefully watched, they can be removed from place to place according to the good pleasure of Him who made them and owns them.

    He has his messengers at his service, and it is just as easy for an angel to remove the minerals from any part of one of these mountains to another, as it is for you and me to walk up and down this hall.

    This however is not understood by the Christian world, nor by us as a people. There are certain circumstances that a number of my brethren and sisters have heard me relate, that will demonstrate this so positively, that none need doubt the truth of what I say." -- Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol-19 p36-37, 17 June 1877

    http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/JournalOfDiscourses3&CISOPTR=9597&REC=19

    After telling us how God moves gold and silver mines so that the wrong people don't find them, Brigham Young blathers on a bit about how his friends find buried treasure left behind by the 'Lamanites' and then he spins a yarn about Oliver Cowdery, Joseph Smith, and more treasure.

    Brigham claims that Oliver Cowdery and Joseph Smith returned the gold plates of the Book of Mormon to the 'Hill Cumorah' in New York. He claims that the hill 'opend' for them and inside the hill is a huge cave that is stacked with piles of gold plates.

    ". . . I lived right in the country where the plates were found from which the Book of Mormon was translated, and I know a great many things pertaining to that country, and I know a great many things pertaining to that country.

    I believe I will take the liberty to tell you of another circumstance that wi

  36. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    The Mormons also abandoned their racism. They have the worlds largest collection of genological data, and I strongly suspect their recantation of their ideas about "mud people" occurred about the same time they did enough research to discover that the majority of their members actually had African ancestors. Sure, the Mormon Church has done some bad things in their past, but nothing that comes close to, say, the Inquisition, or even the arrest of Galileo as a heretic. And of late, they have been trying to distance themselves from that past and establish themselves as mainstream. For the most part, the Mormons I have know personally, including two families of next-door neighbors, have been some of the nicest, most helpful people I have ever known. The only stereotypes they truly deserve is 1) They are intensely devoted to their families (that's a good thing!) and 2) they really suck at partying.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  37. Talk like that will get you excommunicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The few BYU Profs who come out of the closet and make comments that don't conform to offical Mormon policy find themselves quickly out of work and excommunicated.

    For example, the Mormons still believe that the world is 7000 years old. The official teaching direct from the Doctrine and Covenants...

          Q. What are we to understand by the book which John saw, which was sealed on the back with seven seals?

          A. We are to understand that it contains the revealed will, mysteries, and the works of God; the hidden things of his economy concerning this earth during the seven thousand years of its continuance, or its temporal existence.

          Q. What are we to understand by the seven seals with which it was sealed?

          A. We are to understand that the first seal contains the things of the first thousand years, and the second also of the second thousand years, and so on until the seventh.

        D&C 77:6-7.

  38. My favorite dinosaur... by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

    My favorite dinosaur is still the Lickalotapus. Need less to say, my least favorite is the Megasaurass.

    --
    Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
  39. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Yes, BYU has a Paleontology department, and the Dali Lama's talks in Portland were hosted by The University of Portland, Oregon's Catholic University. What's your point? Religious organizations, especially ones devoted to education, do not always behave the way that your narrow, biased stereotypes lead you to expect. Most of them are filled with intelligent people who dedicate their lives to discovering truth, much like Martin Luther (the founder of Protestantism) did.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  40. You have to understand by copponex · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has seen this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Mormon_anachronisms

    and anyone who has read about their belief system would be forgiven for believing that Mormons have a very poor grasp of what science is. After decades of searching and finding no "Mormon cities" in Central America, I can't say I have scientific respect for any geologist or paleontologist or linguist or anthropologist who remains in the church. The entire hypothesis of the religion is scientifically falsifiable and falsified. So why continue with the charade?

    (Notice these claims are made by all religions. Mormonism made the fatal mistake of making specific claims, and in a time where printing presses made their first mistakes all too easy to read.)

  41. In the words of Brigham Young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Does thjis sound like hate to you?

              "You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind....Cain slew his brother. Can might have been killed, and that would have put a termination to that line of human beings. This was not to be, and the Lord put a mark upon him, which is the flat nose and black skin." (Journal of Discourses, Vol. 7, page 290).

              "In our first settlement in Missouri, it was said by our enemies that we intended to tamper with the slaves, not that we had any idea of the kind, for such a thing never entered our minds. We knew that the children of Ham were to be the "servant of servants," and no power under heaven could hinder it, so long as the Lord would permit them to welter under the curse and those were known to be our religious views concerning them." (Journal of Discourses, Volume 2, page 172.)

              "Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so." (Journal of Discourses, Volume 10, page 110.)

    Speach by Gov. Young in Joint Session of the Legeslature.
    Feby. 5th 1852 giving his veiws on slavery.

    " But say some, is there any thing of this kind in the Constitution, the U.S. has given us? If you will allow me the privilege telling right out, it is none of their damned buisness what we do or say here."

    " I am as much oposed to the principle of slavery as any man in the present acceptation or usage of the term, it is abused. I am opposed to abuseing that which God has decreed, to take, a blessing, and make a curse of it. It is a great blessing to the seed of Adam to have the seed of Cain for servants, but those they serve should use them with all the heart and feeling, as they would use their own children, and their compassion should reach over them, and round about them, and treat them as kindly, and with that humane feeling necessary to be shown to mortall beings of the human species. Under these sercumstances there blessings in life are greater in proportion than those who have to provide the bread and dinner for them."

  42. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BYU has had a paleontology department for decades, and they're particularly well known for sauropod dinosaur research, especially thanks to this guy.

    Perhaps you should get your head out of apertures it doesn't easily fit, and stop giving we non-religious people a bad name (my views probably aren't much different from yours), especially when you're badmouthing racism, moral superiority, and hatred of people with different religious views in the same note. If you don't believe this stuff it doesn't give you the excuse to be so prejudiced about it. You're falling into the same trap but with different views.

    No question, BYU's "honor code" is seriously over-the-top ridiculous, but it's not a legitimate reason to say bad things about the science done there. As has been the case for centuries, being deeply religious doesn't prevent you from being a good scientist (ask zombie Newton and Galileo). I've read papers from people working at BYU and I've visited the BYU campus. They do some good science like many other universities. I just wouldn't want to go there to study.

    I guess the thing I can't figure out is why you'd diss these scientist's work simply because they happen to work at BYU, especially when there's a well-established record in this particular area of research (i.e. sauropod dinosaur paleontology). The reason for your expectation is lame as well as being wrong.

  43. Was this one domesticated? by NReitzel · · Score: 1

    After visiting the creation science museum, I wonder if the BYU crew found any evidence of saddles along with the dinosaurs?

    --

    Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

  44. Brigham Young didn't found BYU in 1875? by copponex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Brigham Young didn't found BYU in 1875? I guess next you'll argue that Christ didn't found Christianity. You'd be right, but you wouldn't know why.

    1. Re:Brigham Young didn't found BYU in 1875? by EL_mal0 · · Score: 1

      That still does nothing to prove that BYU was founded on principles of racism and moral superiority. The University of Utah was founded in 1850, by the church-controlled General Assembly (Brigham Young was the governor). Is this institution also founded on principles of racism, moral superiority and hatred of atheism?

      And your last statement "you wouldn't know" why is false. I am familiar with those arguments.

    2. Re:Brigham Young didn't found BYU in 1875? by copponex · · Score: 1

      That still does nothing to prove that BYU was founded on principles of racism and moral superiority. The University of Utah was founded in 1850, by the church-controlled General Assembly (Brigham Young was the governor). Is this institution also founded on principles of racism, moral superiority and hatred of atheism?

      And your last statement "you wouldn't know" why is false. I am familiar with those arguments.

      Let me get this straight: you think the Mormon church in 1850 wasn't racist and they didn't believe they had moral superiority?

      I can rebut this with a single quote from the original source: 2 Nephi 5

      Wherefore, the word of the Lord was fulfilled which he spake unto me, saying that: Inasmuch as they will not hearken unto thy words they shall be cut off from the presence of the Lord. And behold, they were cut off from his presence.

      And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them.

      And thus saith the Lord God: I will cause that they shall be loathsome unto thy people, save they shall repent of their iniquities.

      And cursed shall be the seed of him that mixeth with their seed; for they shall be cursed even with the same cursing. And the Lord spake it, and it was done.

      And because of their cursing which was upon them they did become an idle people, full of mischief and subtlety, and did seek in the wilderness for beasts of prey.

      Religions center around moral superiority. What do you think their purpose is?

    3. Re:Brigham Young didn't found BYU in 1875? by EL_mal0 · · Score: 1

      One last reply before I get on with my life. I don't recall ever saying that the church isn't morally superior, or even that the church didn't keep the priesthood from the blacks for nearly 150 years (some blacks in the early church did hold the priesthood).

      No, I was just saying that the quotes you provide do nothing to show that the school (or schools, when Univ. Utah is included as an institution formed by organizations controlled by the church) was founded on principles of racism, etc. You could sway me by showing quotes about BYU (and/or the U) that mention how racism is a fundamental principle that guided the schools' founding and mission.

    4. Re:Brigham Young didn't found BYU in 1875? by copponex · · Score: 1, Troll

      You could sway me by showing quotes about BYU (and/or the U) that mention how racism is a fundamental principle that guided the schools' founding and mission.

      You already gave up the argument. First, you denied that Young founded the school, because he was a racist, hated atheists, and thought his church was morally superior to all others. Then you state that the church founded the school. Why would a church found a school, if not to produce more good members of the church?

      A good mormon follows the dogmas of the mormon Church. The dogma of the mormon church in the 1850s included racism, the inherent argument they have the morally superior set of ideals, and as every good bad idea, despises apostasy. Their ideal student product would have all of these attributes. The church today has dropped the racism bit, so they could keep their tax exempt status. I mean, because they received a revelation from God.

  45. They're still racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >The Mormons also abandoned their racism.
    Actually they're still very racist. The core book of Mormon theology (The Book of Mormon) is full of racist crap. It's also the word of GOD as revealed by their prophets for the last 150 years.

    Remember at any given time the Mormons have at least 15 living prophets (the three members of the 'Presidencey' and the 12 'Apostles'). All 15 of these old white guys are 'Prohets, Seers, and Revelators'.

    They have never abandoned the racist crap in the BOM.

    In the 1970's due to huge pressure that threaten to eliminate their tax exempt status, they backed down just a little.

  46. I don't want to sound racist but by abbynormal+brain · · Score: 1

    all those long necks look alike

    --
    L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
  47. Re:BYU has a Paleontology department? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if you are aware of this but "Mormons" is a nickname for members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The full name should tell you that Jesus Christ, his life, teachings, and sacrificial death are at the center of their teachings making them what? You guessed it: Christians.

    Also the doctrine of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints encourages learning and seeking out truth.

    In case you're wondering, yes, I am a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

  48. The Mormons declared a Holy War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mormons declared a Holy War.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_B._Marsh

    Direct evidence from Thomas B. Marsh. He was one of the very top Mormon learders.

    He was the President of first Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. These guys are 'the board of directors' of the Mormon church.

    Marsh testified that,

    'At the request of a committee of the citizens of Ray County, I make the following statement in relation to the recent movements, plans & intentions of the Mormons in the counties of Caldwell & Daviess.

    Shortly after the settlement of the difficulties at De Witt in Carroll County, a call was made up by the Mormons at Far West in Caldwell County for volunteers to go to Daviess County, to disperse the mob as they said. On the day before this Joseph Smith the prophet in which he said that all the Mormons who refused to take up arms, if necessary in difficulties with the citizens, should be shot, or otherwise put to death. And as I was there with my family I thought it most prudent to go, and did go with my wagon, as the driver..."

    This is part of the 'War of Extermination' declared by Joseph Smith and his henchman Sidney Rigdon...

    http://www.lds-mormon.com/sr.shtml

    'Rigdon's speech included a "war of extermination, for we will follow them, till the last drop of their blood is spilled or else they will have to exterminate us" which led to Apostle Parley P. Pratt's killing of a militiaman and severely wounding another. Boggs responded with the "Extermination Order" and Pratt, Rigdon, Smith and others did jail time before eventually escaping. The anti-Mormons were more brutal in their revenge, however, and eighteen Mormons were murdered at Haun's Mill.'

  49. Mormons believe in a Universe filled with Gods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Mormon doctirne says that there are many gods.

      Item #143, "INNUMERABLE GALAXIES IN THE UNIVERSE"

    "... Thus the great universe of stars has multiplied beyond the comprehension of men. Evidently each of these great systems is governed by divine law; with divine presiding Gods, for it would be unreasonable to assume that each was not so governed..." -- The Prophet Joseph Fielding Smith, Answers To Gospel Questions, vol-2, p.86
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/14210472/Smith-Joseph-Fielding-Answers-to-Gospel-Questions-Vol-2

    Joseph Fielding Smith was one of the Morom church leaders. His official title was 'President'. He was an official Prophet, Seer, and Revelator -- as are all of the top Mormon leaders.

    All of those Gods start off as regular old humans.

    This teaching was started by the founder of Mormonism, Joseph Smith in a sermon called the King Follet Discourse,

    http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/King_Follett_Discourse

  50. Mormons and Dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it a bit comical that a university run by the LDS church (mormons) is out hunting for dinosaurs. Of course, they think they are alien life-forms from another planet. Or that Adam used to ride them in the garden of Eden.

    http://en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism_and_science/Dinosaurs

    I think these types of findings and studies must put the participating church members through some really fantastic psychological gymnastics. Especially when run through their belief that Adam was the first actual living thing on the Earth.

    http://scriptures.lds.org/en/abr/5/3-7
    http://scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/77/12#12

    There is no way I'd say this out in the open. It isn't polite to object with the local theocracy.

  51. What sense would that be? by portforward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As a Mormon I believe that:

    1) Jesus Christ (then known as Jehovah) under the direction of his father created the earth.
    2) Jesus Christ (then known as Jehovah) spoke to Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Samuel, Isaiah and other prophets in the Old Testament and gave those men His authority to act and speak in His name.
    3) Jesus Christ was born to a virgin named Mary in Bethlehem around 1 AD.
    4) Jesus lived a perfect life and taught his disciples through both word and deed to live a life of love and charity.
    5) Jesus was baptized by immersion by someone with the authority to do so as a symbol of his mission, and that we would also do so. He gave His apostles this same authority.
    6) Jesus took upon Himself the cumulative guilt of all people in this world in the garden of Gethsemane. He was then killed on a cross, but arose to live again the third day.
    7) We believe that through His sacrifice our sins and guilt can be taken away. All I need to do is follow Him.
    8) We believe that Christ continues to speak to prophets today and that someday He will return to earth.

    That is a very basic summation of what Mormons believe about Christ. But while doctrine is interesting, the true proof of a Christian is conduct - how well the person lives the precepts that are taught.

  52. Interesting how you left out all the Morom stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's interesting to me how you left out all of the stuff that actually define Mormonism.

    Stuff like,
    1) God was once a human.
    2) The universe is filled with Gods. Each one has his own planet to rule.
    3) God has a holy harem composed of his sisters.
    4) All humans are literally the children of God and his holy harem.
    5) All humans can become Gods by following the special rules that only Mormons know. Once of those rules is that you must have multiple wives in heaven (your holy harem). This is detailed in Mormon scripture, Doctrine and Covenants Section 132.
    6) When you graduate to godhood, you get your own holy harem and a planet of your own to rule.
    7) To get into the cool part of heaven where you can go to school and learn stuff about becoming a god, you need to know the secret Mormon handshakes and passwords.
    8) After Jesus died, he came to America and did all kinds of cool stuff.
    9) Jesus is literally Satan's older brother. And Jesus and Satan are our older brothers.

    Well, either brothers or half-brothers. Mormons aren't specific about which members of God's Holy Harem gave bith to each of us. But basically Mormonism is the Churck of Universal Eternal Incest.

    There's tons more stuff that I could list but that's not a bad place to start.

    Most of the stuff in this list comes directly from the teachings of Joseph Smith. Look at the sermon called "King Follett Discourse" for details:
    http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/King_Follett_Discourse

    And this stuff is not just crazy ramblings from 150 years ago that are now rejected. For example, about the "Infinite Gods", here's the official teaching. The guy being quoted is one of the past top dogs in the Mormon church.

    The top dog is called the 'President'. He's officially a 'Prophet, Seer, and Revelator', as are the other 14 slightly-less-than-top dogs. This quote is from J.F.Smith but it's still taught to this day.

    Item #143, "INNUMERABLE GALAXIES IN THE UNIVERSE"

    "... Thus the great universe of stars has multiplied beyond the comprehension of men. Evidently each of these great systems is governed by divine law; with divine presiding Gods, for it would be unreasonable to assume that each was not so governed..." -- The Prophet Joseph Fielding Smith, Answers To Gospel Questions, vol-2, p.86
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/14210472/Smith-Joseph-Fielding-Answers-to-Gospel-Questions-Vol-2

  53. You left out all the interesting stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christians believe that there is one god that created everything. They also believe that anyone who believes in more than one god is not a Christian.

    Mormons believe that the universe is filled will gods, each of whom rules their own little planet.

    Here's a quote from Joseph Fielding Smith. He is one of the past leaders of the Mormon church. The nearest analogy to his role is that of Pope in the Catholic Church.

    The Mormons call their leader the 'President'. He's officially a 'Prophet, Seer, and Revelator', as are the other 14 top leaders of the Mormon church.

    Item #143, "INNUMERABLE GALAXIES IN THE UNIVERSE"

    "... Thus the great universe of stars has multiplied beyond the comprehension of men. Evidently each of these great systems is governed by divine law; with divine presiding Gods, for it would be unreasonable to assume that each was not so governed..." -- The Prophet Joseph Fielding Smith, Answers To Gospel Questions, vol-2, p.86
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/14210472/Smith-Joseph-Fielding-Answers-to-Gospel-Questions-Vol-2

    And this stuff can not be dismissed as crazy ramblings from years ago that is now rejected. This is core doctrine that was established in the first years of their movement and has been taught ever since.

    Mormon core beliefs are,

    1) God was once a human.
    2) The universe is filled with Gods. Each one has his own planet to rule.
    3) God has a holy harem composed of his sisters.
    4) All humans are literally the children of God and his holy harem.
    5) All humans can become Gods by following the special rules that only Mormons know. Once of those rules is that you must have multiple wives in heaven (your holy harem). This is detailed in Mormon scripture, Doctrine and Covenants Section 132.
    6) When you graduate to godhood, you get your own holy harem and a planet of your own to rule.
    7) To get into the cool part of heaven where you can go to school and learn stuff about becoming a god, you need to know the secret Mormon handshakes and passwords.
    8) After Jesus died, he came to America and did all kinds of cool stuff.
    9) Jesus is literally Satan's older brother. And Jesus and Satan are our older brothers.

    Well, either brothers or half-brothers. Mormons aren't specific about which members of God's Holy Harem gave bith to each of us. But basically Mormonism is the Church of Universal Eternal Incest.

    There's tons more stuff that I could list but that's not a bad place to start.

    Most of the stuff in this list comes directly from the teachings of Joseph Smith as outlined in the sermon called "King Follett Discourse", and then expanded in many other sermons and writings.

    For details, see:
    http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/King_Follett_Discourse

  54. "elite"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Elite" means you're smart enough not to drag knuckles for Palin?

    She herself said it meant people who went to college.