Slashdot Mirror


Google Acquires Online Image Editing Tool Picnik

Many different sources are writing to tell us about Google's acquisition of online image editing tool Picnik. "And all this leads us to today’s exciting news: we’ve just been acquired by Google! What does this mean for Picnik? It means we can think BIG. Google processes petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class team, it is truly the best home we could have found. Under the Google roof we’ll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome. What does this mean for you Picnikers? Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now has more potential than ever before. The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier, more intuitive and more fun, so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we’re working on."

84 comments

  1. Awwww! by MattGWU · · Score: 5, Funny

    "And all this leads us to today's exciting news: we've just been acquired by Google! What does this mean for Picnik? It means we can think BIG. Google processes petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class team, it is truly the best home we could have found. Under the Google roof we'll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome. What does this mean for you Picnikers? Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now has more potential than ever before. The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier, more intuitive and more fun, so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we're working on."

    That's so cute!

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
    1. Re:Awwww! by Snaller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "What does this mean for Picnik?"

      It means you are all out on your ass in six months *g*

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    2. Re:Awwww! by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but 6 months of free food, free fitness center, plus whatever the shareholders got...

  2. I am Sergey Brin of Borg. by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.

    And here's an advertisement for something related to the picture of Britney Spears you're photoshopping.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:I am Sergey Brin of Borg. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

      You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.

      Resisting? Who's resisting? You had me at "I'm Sergey Brin"...

    2. Re:I am Sergey Brin of Borg. by Black+Gold+Alchemist · · Score: 2, Funny

      The google borg cubes (gborg gcubes?) will have dynamic google ads up and down their sides showing ads relevant to whatever race they're assimilating.

      --
      Responsibility is an addiction
      Virtue is a temptation
      Community is a cartel
  3. Jeepers! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...making more photos more awesome.

    Nice to see that 13 year olds can get work in this economy.

    1. Re:Jeepers! by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 1

      only the awesomest 13 year olds

  4. Premium features to be free? by cytoman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That's what I'm interested in finding out but there is no mention anywhere about it - will the premium features (paid version) of Picnik be free from now on? Or will Google continue the practice of charging for premium features?

    Personally, I hope they make it all free. I'm cheap, in case you had any doubt.

    1. Re:Premium features to be free? by garcia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have been using Picnick for years with my Flickr account (because it's easier than me doing it in Photoshop myself--as I only have one copy of that on one computer) and only recently have I run into wanting to use something other than what they have for free.

    2. Re:Premium features to be free? by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Depends on the pricing and if they can cover the cost with advertising. Google still charges for Sketchup Pro after they got bought, for example, but it isn't exactly conducive to advertising and is used by design firms, etc who can't afford or don't need larger CAD/animation packages

      Picnik Premium seems to cost a couple of bucks a month and is aimed at casual users. Its main costs are bandwidth and storage, which Google can supply in abundance. I imagine advertising could cover whatever else that couple of bucks supports, so it is possible.

      On the other hand, Google might be trying to make products pay for themselves instead of just relying on advertising.

    3. Re:Premium features to be free? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      Google has a history of releasing paid stuff for free. Keyhole was originally extremely expensive, and they released Google Earth free. They still charge something like $30 for the next version up, but that's a lot less than the several hundred+ it was originally.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    4. Re:Premium features to be free? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      They still charge something like $30 for the next version up, but that's a lot less than the several hundred+ it was originally.

      Well they used to, but they've canned the Earth Plus and incorporated it into plain 'ol Earth. Not sure what that means in terms of the current issue, but there you are.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Premium features to be free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article didn't mention, and I didn't follow through to the other links yet either, but I wonder if this will change its integration with Flickr since Flickr is part of yahoo.

    6. Re:Premium features to be free? by slyguy135 · · Score: 1

      They now offer Google Earth Pro (http://www.google.com/enterprise/earthmaps/earth_pro.html) instead.

  5. What does it mean?!? by goofyspouse · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What does this mean for Picnik?"

    Seriously? It means you are frickin' rich now.

  6. Dorks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I read above was "technology", "reaching more people", blah blah blah...

    You should be saying, "WooHoo! Private jets! Yachts! Banging swimsuit models on said yachts! Money! Private Islands with beautiful naked women! Money!"

    But nooooooooooo. You type there about technology and whatnot!

    The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier, more intuitive and more fun, so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we’re working on.

    Snore.

    Photoshop.

    Zzzzzzz

    GIMP

    Zzzzzzz

    Paint.net

    Snort snort snort

    Yawn

    Oh yeah, I hope you got paid in cash. Goog is at it's peak; meaning, if you got paid in stock, you're gonna lose.

    1. Re:Dorks by jeffstar · · Score: 1

      minus the private jets and money, my life is a lot like that!
      1) go to a tropical place
      2) get tanned
      3) ????
      4) yachts & hotties!

  7. Photo Editor, not Image Editor by javakah · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a photo editor, not an image editor. If you want an image editor, you might try Splashup http://www.splashup.com/

    1. Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor by treeves · · Score: 1

      "Splashup, formerly Fauxto, is a powerful editing tool and photo manager."

      I was thinking it was sort of a stupid name, but it's not quite as stupid as it used to be!

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    2. Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor by Haymaker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great, you HAD to mention Splashup. Now Google is going to buy them too. Way to go.

    3. Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first rule of Splashup is...

    4. Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor by nclemenson · · Score: 1
      --
      He who laughs lasts.
    5. Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they do you could try Pixlr

    6. Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor by prichardson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the difference between a photo editor and an image editor?

      Thanks

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    7. Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well typically, an image editor has pixel editing functionality, whereas a photo editor is usually editing the entire thing at once, such as brightness, hue, etc.

    8. Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's the difference between a photo editor and an image editor?

      Image editor is an application designed for manipulation of 2D bitmap raster image data, usually using a set of very complex, powerful and effective functions such as drawing tools, filters, layering and channel operations.

      Photo editor is a piece of shit sold to gullible customers, "allowing" them to "manage" and "archive" all of their "digital photos" and sometimes even perform a limited set of "operations" on them, making the whole process "fun".

      So, the only real difference is the feature set, the primary activities you do with the programs, and the feature set. Hope this clear things up. =)

    9. Re:Photo Editor, not Image Editor by kriston · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look in the mirror. If you're wearing a beret and a soul patch, it's an image editor. If you're wearing a backwards baseball cap and a goatee, it's a photo editor.

      --

      Kriston

  8. Flickr or Picasa? by iPhr0stByt3 · · Score: 1

    Picnik is a pretty neat tool. I mean... I'm cool with paint.net so my needs are simple anyway, but it's also nice to have a web-based tool available anywhere. I just hope they don't eventually pull out of flickr and go exclusively with Picasa now. ...seems to me at one point google supported Firefox. I know this isn't the same, but it also would not surprise me to see picnik removed from flickr eventually.

  9. Am I alone? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is anyone else getting sick of hearing exciting stories about Google?

    1. Re:Am I alone? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      exciting stories

      Not even you sound like your quite sick yet.

    2. Re:Am I alone? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      OK, you're on to me. I'd like to take a vacation day from exciting stories about Google then.

    3. Re:Am I alone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monkey Fight!

    4. Re:Am I alone? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Is anyone else getting sick of hearing exciting stories about Google?

      If you're sick of it, why are you increasing the comment count in a Google thread and helping Slashdot serve ads?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Am I alone? by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      What is this 'Google' you speak of? I've never heard of them.

    6. Re:Am I alone? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Google farts.
      Google fanbois inhale deeply;
      Proclaim "Google is Great!"

    7. Re:Am I alone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=google

  10. picnik is all that...if you are blind by radicalbiscuit · · Score: 1

    Google will now be processing petabytes of poor image composition techniques every day.

  11. How to get rich quick! by KPexEA · · Score: 1

    1) Copy some desktop app but make it "online"
    2) Get bought by Google!
    3) Profit!

    1. Re:How to get rich quick! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I took the Calculator App and put it online. Sadly - it still has not been purchased.

      I'm thinking I'll try Volume control next.

    2. Re:How to get rich quick! by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

      Hell, I did this years ago with the power button, you're right, no-one has ever pressed it.

      http://www.turnofftheinternet.com/

      --
      http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  12. TinEye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh how I would love to see Google acquire TinEye, or develop their own product. I love the idea of TinEye but the data just isn't there. Google doesn't have that problem.

    1. Re:TinEye by KPexEA · · Score: 1

      Yes! Totally agree, TinEye is great!

  13. On potential... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [quote]Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now has more potential than ever before.[/quote]

    But... any potential outcomes at this point were always potential outcomes. Insofar as it can be assigned an ordinal representation, potential must be monotonically decreasing.

  14. honestly who pays for this... lots it seems... by johnjones · · Score: 1

    they where intent on billing people for effects that essentially you could do in imagemagick

    but what mattered was the ability to do things in a flash platform
    wake up yahoo and build something nice... add to flickr
    what people really liked was the sprinkling of dew... have a sense of humor and it gets you a lot

    there are lots of online photoshop tools but the easyest way to tell if they are serious is to find if they have a image clone tool...

    odd but true

    they where insistent on billing people I will be interested if google wants this to continue

    regards

    John Jones

  15. Good Luck, Picnikers by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What does this mean for you Picnikers? Nothing is changing right away...

    Which, of course, translates to "You'll continue to have a job at least until all the financial details of the sale are arranged. After that, who knows?" I'm speaking from experience here. I've had my employer "acquired" a couple of times and always ended up unemployed afterwards.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:Good Luck, Picnikers by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      Depending on how early these pickickers joined, they might walk out with a nice roll of dough in their pockets, which I wouldn't mind.

    2. Re:Good Luck, Picnikers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [CEO Jonathan] Sposato noted that nearly all of the employees who work at Picnik will come out ahead on the deal financially, calling it a "very, very, very great win."

      http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/03/picniks_sposato_on_google_sale_a_very_happy_number.html

    3. Re:Good Luck, Picnikers by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      The last time my company was acquired (the only time, actually) I got $10k up front, a new hiring-bonus, and a big fat bundle of retention bonuses. Yes: in 2008, even.

      Then they closed the San Mateo office and moved us down to Sunnyvale. That still kind of stinks. :(

      Your mileage may vary.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    4. Re:Good Luck, Picnikers by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      Which, of course, translates to "You'll continue to have a job at least until all the financial details of the sale are arranged.

      Which could also translate to, "Layoffs were averted by our acquisition by a deep-pocketed major player."

      Seth

    5. Re:Good Luck, Picnikers by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Nice. I hope all the Picnikers do as well.

      Grew up in San Mateo, BTW. On the wrong side of 101, though.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    6. Re:Good Luck, Picnikers by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      Picnik employees now commute to downtown Seattle -- easily accessible on buses, trains, and ferries from much of four counties.

      They will be moving to Google's offices in Fremont (North Seattle).

      I'm guessing many of them who did not drive to work will soon have to do so. Here comes more traffic!

  16. The Plan by doomy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    1. Do No Evil.

    2. ??

    3. World Domination.

    --
    ...free your source and the rest would follow...
  17. Eating Yahoo's lunch by l00sr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Picnik is highly integrated with flickr, which is owned by Yahoo. Google's own Picasaweb has never quite taken off the same way... I'd say they're jealous.

    1. Re:Eating Yahoo's lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picnik is highly integrated with flickr, which is owned by Yahoo. Google's own Picasaweb has never quite taken off the same way... I'd say they're jealous.

      Yahoo should have bought Picnik! -.-

    2. Re:Eating Yahoo's lunch by drago · · Score: 1

      I'd rather say they're going to take Picnik out of business just to step on Yahoos foot while ramping up the advertising for picasaweb at the same time ;-)

  18. It's Picasa by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

    This application is basically on online version of the Picasa editing tools. I find it hard to believe that Google would not already be working on adding those tools to Picasaweb. Will this really help them to do that any faster? Or does this just clear the way for the launch of those tools, while also providing an initial user base?

    1. Re:It's Picasa by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      They've done this a dozen times or more. It's easier to buy an existing product (and the developers) than to get their own shit together.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:It's Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is. It is almost always easier for a large company to buy an existing small company than the develop the same thing internally, and there's sound reasons for that.

      Most development teams are doing worse than the best development team in a segment. In any segment, there's usually at least ten teams trying to get things for that segment ready. For a large company, starting up ten teams internally is going to lead to disappointment among 90% of those teams, and they know it beforehand - so it's bad for morale. Buying the best after the best have taken the risk as an independent company and proven that they can make this work is not that bad for morale (except possibly in those companies that don't get bought).

      Even if the large company on average has better employees and better support than the startups, this still gives the advantage to the startups, just by many startups evolutionary trying more approaches and some of them hitting on the right combo.

      It gives the advantage to the large company in the end, though, because they can get the technology by buying the small companies and integrating them with a number of advantages of being large (ability to handle lawsuits through deeper pockets, ability to do patent cross-licensing deals, ability to aggregate a bunch of functions...)

  19. What does this mean for flickr? by anethema · · Score: 1

    I'm kind of invested in Flickr for online photo organization and storage, and haven't yet tried Picasa. Flickr uses Picnik for photo editing but Flickr is owned by yahoo. Anyone think Flickr will dump Picnik or photo editing all together now that a competitor owns it ?

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  20. Flash by jj00 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't that site use Flash? So does this mean that Google is all well and good with Adobe?

    1. Re:Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol - sounds like you believed that crap. google are not stupid.

      flash is the single most distributed piece of software in history and as it rolls out onto mobile phones its dominance will only increase.

      its a gutter if you're fond of attaching yourself to lost causes like html5 (2022!!!!!) or more plastic icrap from the kings of marketing. but there ya go - life's a bitch.

      this is nice little online app, but its nothing compared to what will be possible with flash in the near distant future. like it or not :)

    2. Re:Flash by D+Ninja · · Score: 2, Funny

      google are not stupid.

      Is they now?

    3. Re:Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google are a website and a company.

      if you can't understand that then maybe you is a bit stupid...?

    4. Re:Flash by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Google does good stuff with flash.

      Analytics uses flash and not SVG for its charts (if memory serves correctly).

      Also the google PDF viewer is the most pleasant use of flash ever. And considering the flash plugin is lighter and less heavy than the acrobat plugin, a great way to reduce annoying adobeness in ones browser.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re:Flash by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1

      In UK English, companies are often considered as plural ("Google are"), while in the US we think of them as singular ("Google is").

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
  21. Such love for Flash all of a sudden by cababunga · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I recently came across this: http://editor.pixastic.com/ All it needs is a browser with canvas support. I think it's pretty cool and that's what Google should be considering.

    1. Re:Such love for Flash all of a sudden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sigh, compare that effort to the splashup.com site mentioned above.
      talk about doing your "cause" a disservice!!!!! :)

      i don't care if you're carrying a lot of baggage or maybe trying to impress the idiots around here that do (probably the latter.)

      the fact is you look pathetic posting that link. maybe you realize that now?

  22. "Picnikers" = users by Gorimek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dude, the statement talks about how it will affect the users.

    Some of them will surely become unemployed, but that is unrelated to this deal.

    1. Re:"Picnikers" = users by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Dude, the statement talks about how it will affect the users.

      Some of them will surely become unemployed, but that is unrelated to this deal.

      I interpreted it as meaning employees, but you may very well be right.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    2. Re:"Picnikers" = users by Caetel · · Score: 1

      In which case the answer should be Google will close down the current service offering shortly and months down the line offer a similar service under the Google banner.

  23. Looking forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any decent operating system must have a photo editor. This is just another software that would integrate Chrome OS.

  24. Just one typo away from fame and fortune... by fm6 · · Score: 1

    My personal domain is picknit.com. (I'm a tech writer. What do tech writers do?) All I needed was for somebody to enter "picknit" instead of "picnik" and I'd be in acquisition nirvana.

    I just can't catch a break.

  25. Uh oh... by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 4, Funny

    "And all this leads us to today's exciting news: we've just been acquired by Google! WHat doEs this mean for Picnik? It means we can think BIG. GoogLe Processes petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class teaM, it is truly the bEst home we could have found. Under the Google roof we'll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome. What does THis mEan for You Picnikers? Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now HAs more potential than eVEr before. The team that buiLt Picnik frOm The graSs up will continue making advanced and pOwerFul photo-editinG easier, more intUitive and more funN, So stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we're working on."

    --
    "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  26. Hmm... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1
    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  27. gGetFamous by Mourice · · Score: 1

    I'm not necessarily for rampant acquisition by a single company, but I have to admit that I only discover a lot of great services by the announcement that they've been purchased by Google.

    --

    No excellent soul is exempt from a mixture of madness. --Aristotle
  28. Google the new Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..unable to innovate so instead just buy up companies and then ruin them

  29. Certainly a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chrome OS was in need of.

  30. Rejuvenating currently owned websites, maybe? by jseale · · Score: 1

    Looks like Google wants to rejuvenate an ageing Picasa by rolling Picnik's feature set into it or giving Picasa a complete makeover all together with Picnik's help. It'd be cool to see Picnik's features in the Picasa stand-alone app, would give Photoshop a run for its money for sure.

  31. http://www.music21.hi2.ro/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ie she is