Privacy With a 4096 Bit RSA Key — Offline, On Paper
HavanaF writes "Online backup is practical, but can it offer any privacy? The Dutch security company Safeberg developed an Offline Private Key Protocol, with an asymmetric key scheme. The protocol demands that the private (decryption) key be stored away from the 'source' computer, which presumably is 'too vulnerable.' The catch is that the private key needs to be fairly large to be secure: a 4,096-bit RSA key should suffice for some years. But how to store an 800-character key offline? Safeberg introduces a machine readable paper key, with the 4k-bit key crammed in a giant 2D Datamatrix barcode. This video on key strength tells the story."
Which brings to mind an important question: Why not just have the machine read the hex?
Can you be Even More Awesome?!
Than a 4096 Bit RSA Key that is stored on a standalone computer?
The company could store a last-resort backup at a different facility, and allow you access after checking a bunch of biometrics.
I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
Online backup is practical
not for my 1.5 terabyte HDD which is about half full.
Right now backing up from hard drive to hard drive takes forever (hours). How the fuck am I gonna back up to a remote server over the internet at 60 kbytes/sec?
Hang on! let me get my giant barcode out of my pocket!
that reminds me of Robin Williams doing his Adam and Eve sketch....."Stand back honey, I do not know how big this can get!!"
"If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
Do people actually use the systems they produce and sell?
Free Manning, jail Obama.
There's no reason you cannot insert check digits into the number as well.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Since the purpose of this is to backup critical data, you want to make darn sure that you never loose the key, or all the data is worthless. Storing pieces of paper securely and safe from disaster is something that we have been doing for years, and you don't have to look very far for a solution. On the otherhand, most safes, fire boxes and safety deposit boxes will still get hot enough enough in a fire to destroy any digital media stored in them.Paper offers a simple, traditional backup while something like a smart-card could be used on a day to day basis.
So what could be so hard about memorizing a measly 800 or so characters?
Pi might be hard. But for encryption keys, It's not hard at all. You just repeat "12345" one hundred and sixty times.
Now, I want half of you to mod this funny, because it is. I want the other half of you to mod it insightful, because we all know that when you put 4096 bit encryption into the hands of an average person, they really do type 12345 one hundred and sixty times.
Also, if you can recover most of the digits and know which ones are missing you can probably brute force the rest.
...paper is just silly. It is less "safe" (as opposed to secure) than a USB key...
Paper has hundreds of years of technology development behind it; what is the oldest USB key you have? Technology easily and readily exists to store quality archive paper nearly indefinitely in temperature/light/humidity controlled environments.
I might even guestimate bar code technology will disappear long before a properly created and stored paper archive.
Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
I punched my private key onto 80 column punched cards for offline storage back in 1979. It was the only way to keep a key private on a mainframe where the operator could read all files.