Slashdot Mirror


New Material Sets Stage For All-Optical Computing

An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt from the International Business Times: "Researchers have made a new material that can be used to guide waves of light, a breakthrough that could lead to ultra-fast computing. Georgia Tech scientists are using specially designed organic dyes that can process and redirect light without the need to be converted to electricity first. ... 'For this class of molecules, we can with a high degree of reliability predict where the molecules will have both large optical nonlinearities and low two-photon absorption,' said [Georgia Tech School of Chemistry professor Seth] Marder." According to the article, using an optical router could lead to transmission speeds as high as 2,000 gigabits per second, five times faster than current technology.

13 of 53 comments (clear)

  1. Faster FAster FASTER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "five times faster than current technology." Reminds me of being a teenager and discovering lotion...

  2. Re:Didn't see that coming by Serilleous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, its true, transmission speeds and routing capacity are usually measured in bits rather than megs or kb. (this probably has something to do with the whole kb/mb doesn't follow powers of ten thing)

  3. Have you seen the pic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I could not get my eyes from that advertisy pic.

    Must...read...article.

  4. Similar stuff from IBM by distantbody · · Score: 2, Interesting

    EETimes has "IBM Research claimed a keystone achievement in on-chip optical communications Wednesday (March 3), saying its 40-gigabit-per-second (Gbps) germanium avalanche photodetector completes what it calls the nanophotonic toolkit." (link) (A few days before announcing 2,500 layoffs, hmmm...)

    ...And the same news from Semiconductor Intl.

  5. Optocouplers by derGoldstein · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to benchmark this against graphene. Since optical signals don't have to be converted to electrical first, then (I think) the bottleneck would be the optoelectronics.

    --
    Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    1. Re:Optocouplers by Hurricane78 · · Score: 3, Informative

      optoelectronics

      If they don’t have to be converted to electricity first, then where are the electronics in this?

      A better name is “photonics”. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  6. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Exactly, like lower latency. The conversion into an electrical signal, and then back to optical probably adds a bit of latency. I'm no expert, but I'd imagine that data going to and from a typical destination on the internet goes through several of these conversions adding (in most cases negligible) latency. If most of the routers on the net were all optical, I'd imagine we'd have an internet with imperceptible latency most of the time. That could lead to things as simple as lag-free gaming, real-time video conferencing, and maybe in the future a very (sur)real shared virtual reality, all done across large physical distances.

  7. Re:Didn't see that coming by Darth+Sdlavrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Probably has more to do with the fact that historically some hardware had byte and word sizes that weren't multiples of 8.

    E.g. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/36-bit

  8. Re:But by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course. Because the new technology also is getting better. And usually at a much quicker rate than the existing one, because that one is already at the end of its limits.

    There often even is new technology that is still worse than the old one, because of its experimental state. But worth pursuing anyway, because of the huge potential.

    The same is true for optical circuits.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  9. Re:Didn't see that coming by belthize · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gah I hate these lame random units .. gigabits/second.

    Could somebody translate that to a more standard Libararies of Congress/fortnight please.

  10. Re:But by cowscows · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first automobiles could easily be outrun by a horse. I guess we're fortunate that no one noticed that or else they would've all agreed that automobile technology was a waste of time and should be abandoned.

    --

    One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  11. Power & Heat by CraigoFL · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's funny... when the tech industry first started talking about switching to light instead of electricity for the chip insides, the biggest motivating factor was speed. How much faster (usually determined in "clock" speed even) can we make a chip if we can use photons instead of electrons? These days, I'm more interested in other factors:
    • How much electricity (per unit of performance) does it use?
    • How much heat does it put out?
    • How much smaller can we make the chip and its supporting components?

    This is a result of the highly-clustered, highly-mobile computing age we live in today. A single fast chip isn't as applicable any more. Give us tiny and low-power.

  12. Probably not much to see here, at least yet by Curmudgeon420 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The big issues in designing optical switches is their switching time and minimum switch pulse width. I and my group built what is probably the first all-optical computer in the early '90s. We used Lithium Niobate switches, which limited the machine's clock frequency of 100 MHz. It's hard to find the original article, which is in the Feb. 18 issue of Science Express. Subscription required, unfortunately. In that article the authors say nothing about switching time, or minimum switch pulse. It looks like a good piece of research, but eons away from anything practical.