Slashdot Mirror


California To Create Public Animal Abuser Registry

An anonymous reader writes "California legislators are moving forward with plans to create a public, online, animal abuser registry identical in function to the public sex offender registry. Is this the slippery slope to further government mandated lists and registries?"

5 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sounds Good To Me by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe, but if so we certainly could also consider adding some of those PETA loonies.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  2. Re:Sounds Good To Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apparently you have not paid any attention on how actual farming is implemented recently.

    It's not quite the land of sunshine that is painted on the tele.

    No, I'm afraid farming today is fairly beyond the concept of humane.

  3. Re:History repeats itself by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Informative

    The title means "miserable ones" It's about a guy that was in jail, served his time and had to carry a document identifying him as a former criminal. Then pretty much everyone in society that knew he was a former criminal because of that identification made his life outside of prison a living hell. There is a lot more to it that comes later but that is the gist of the beginning.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  4. Re:Sounds Good To Me by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative

    If they didn't violate the trust of people who send animals to them, thinking that it'll be good for the animal... I might agree.

    Don't give an unwanted animal to PETA. Give them to the Humane Society. They'll try. They spend money on actual animals, instead of just obnoxious advertising campaigns and donations to terrorist groups who firebomb research labs and the like.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  5. Re:Sounds Good To Me by The_Wilschon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or, of course, you could just throw out the crude attempt to classify people based on their crimes, and classify based on psychological evaluation. What you really want is a list of sociopaths, whether they be the blue collar flavor who flip out and kill somebody, or the white collar flavor who can keep their inhumanity in check long enough to make it through business school and do some real damage...

    You should read David Brin's book Sundiver. It is set in a society that has this system. His portrayal of it seems reasonable (although "seems reasonable" and "is correct" are two very different beasts, I know), and is definitely not something I want to live in the middle of. I'd vote against this proposal.

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.