Slashdot Mirror


Popular Science Frees Its 137-Year Archives

DesScorp writes "Popular Science magazine has scanned every issue they've ever produced, and posted the archives at their website, at no charge. 'We've partnered with Google to offer our entire 137-year archive for free browsing. Each issue appears just as it did at its original time of publication, complete with period advertisements. It's an amazing resource that beautifully encapsulates our ongoing fascination with the future, and science and technology's incredible potential to improve our lives. We hope you enjoy it as much as we do.'" First search: the history of the flying car.

9 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sudden outbreak of common sense by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The entire point of organized science is to let anyone read"

    Ya, but Popular Science, is about the popularization of existing research, not the nitty gritty of the research itself. Real science--peer review journals--are even more closed off than commercial magazines. Given science's reputation for free inquiry and openness, it's ironic that scientific publications are the last vestige of closed media in an increasingly open society.

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
  2. The period ads by istartedi · · Score: 4, Informative

    I bet the period advertisements alone will be priceless.

    As much as we hate advertising on the web, there is definitely something to be said for ads as a window into history.

    With so much content being dynamicly generated, we won't have period ads like we did with print.

    Embedded advertising could solve this, and it wouldn't be a problem if it were done as still images and text analagous to a printed ad. Of course, online advertisers seem to have a habit of shooting themselves in the foot in this regard--the temptation to introduce obtrusive ads just ups the ante in the arms race.

    Reading ads from pop sci might tell you that Ford has been in business for over 100 years. Reading web pages archived from today will tell you nothing of the sort. The ad will either be fetched and dynamicly generated (and thus be non-period) or it will be edited out by the archiver.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  3. The article you were looking for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    was a 1974 cover of... Popular *Mechanics*, with an illustration of a Moller M400 taking off from someone's driveway.

  4. A nice start by houghi · · Score: 2, Informative

    But all you can do now is do a search. Only then you can select something you found and browse the magazine. It would be nice to be able to go to a certain issue and start browsing.
    And all they need to do is index the IDs.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:A nice start by houghi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seems there is a way and much better interface to use http://books.google.com/books?id=qR8DAAAAMBAJ which will point to the first issue. Great using the full-screen ability of your browser and see two pages next to each other.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  5. Breakthroughs by MartinSchou · · Score: 5, Informative

    Relativity: June, 1914, page 434
    Quantum mechanics: February 1927, page 22
    Atomic bomb: October 1945, page 80
    Integrated circuits: September 1966, page 96

  6. Re:Foresight by icebraining · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bandwidth is cheap.

    Especially if Google provides it, as in this case.

  7. Re:Format? by icebraining · · Score: 2, Informative

    Google Books. No download link at sight.

  8. Re:Kudos to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    You probably won't though, will you?